본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Language Learners as Digital Bricoleurs: Exploring Independent Learning in Individual Digital Ecologies

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Though there is a wealth of digital resources available for independent computer-assisted language learning, language teachers may find mixed success in supporting learners in using it. Teachers need to understand their learners and how educational information-communication technology and the target language are integrated in their lives. We present the concepts of digital ecology and digital bricolage. Building on a prior survey study on English learner technology use at a Korean college, this qualitative case study explores ways that four Korean college students integrated technology and English into their lives. Drawing on a priori and emergent themes from interviews, we explore students’ digital ecologies and their processes of digital bricolage. We found that types of technology use varied across these cases, suggesting the value of digital ecologies for thinking about student technology use. Further, variations of technology use across the cases suggest that learners draw selectively from their available digital ecologies based on their perceptions of what it means to learn English and their personal priorities. We propose a framework for understanding language learner digital bricolage based on formality and instrumentality. This framework is of value to researchers and teachers who want to support students in digitally mediated self-directed language learning.

Abstract

Though there is a wealth of digital resources available for independent computer-assisted language learning, language teachers may find mixed success in supporting learners in using it. Teachers need to understand their learners and how educational information-communication technology and the target language are integrated in their lives. We present the concepts of digital ecology and digital bricolage. Building on a prior survey study on English learner technology use at a Korean college, this qualitative case study explores ways that four Korean college students integrated technology and English into their lives. Drawing on a priori and emergent themes from interviews, we explore students’ digital ecologies and their processes of digital bricolage. We found that types of technology use varied across these cases, suggesting the value of digital ecologies for thinking about student technology use. Further, variations of technology use across the cases suggest that learners draw selectively from their available digital ecologies based on their perceptions of what it means to learn English and their personal priorities. We propose a framework for understanding language learner digital bricolage based on formality and instrumentality. This framework is of value to researchers and teachers who want to support students in digitally mediated self-directed language learning.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Abrams, Z. I., "The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in german", The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), pp.157~167 (2003)[DOI]
  2. Michael W. Apple, "Are We Wasting Money on Computers in Schools?", Educational Policy, 18(3), pp.513~522 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  3. Karley Beckman, "Understanding students' use and value of technology for learning", Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), pp.346~367 (2013), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  4. Bødker, S., "The human-artifact model : An activity theoretical approach to artifact ecologies", Human-Computer Interaction, 26(4), pp.315~371 (2011)[DOI]
  5. Braun, V., "Using thematic analysis in psychology", Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp.77~101 (2006)[DOI]
  6. Briggs, Neil, "The Digital Ecologies of Korean College Students: An Exploration of Digital Self-Directed Learning", 영상영어교육, 19(1), pp.107~127 (2018), 영상영어교육학회[DOI]
  7. Brown, J. S., "Growing up digital : How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn", Change : The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2), pp.11~20 (2000)
  8. Michael D. Bush, "Computer-Assisted Language Learning: From Vision to Reality?", CALICO Journal, 25(3), pp.443~470 (2013), Equinox Publishing[DOI]
  9. Charmaz, K., "Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis" (2006), SAGE
  10. Chen, X. -B., "Tablets for informal language learning : Student usage and attitudes", Language Learning, 17(1), pp.20~36 (2013)
  11. 최재영, "A Study on College Students’ Perceptions of English Learning in Korea", Foreign Languages Education, 19(4), pp.99~126 (2012), 한국외국어교육학회
  12. "Bloom’s digital taxonomy" (2010)[URL]
  13. Creswell, J. W., "Designing and conducting mixed methods research" (2017), SAGE
  14. Cuban, L., "Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920" (1986), Teachers College Press
  15. Curwood, J. S., "English teachers’ cultural models about technology : A microethnographic perspective on professional development", Journal of Literacy Research, 46(1), pp.9~38 (2014)[DOI]
  16. Fisher, T., "Teachers’ knowing how to use technology : Exploring a conceptual framework for purposeful learning activity", Curriculum Journal, 23(3), pp.307~325 (2012)[DOI]
  17. Flyvbjerg, B., "Five misunderstandings about case-study research", Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), pp.219~245 (2006)[DOI]
  18. Gillespie, J., "Resistance to CALL : Degrees of student reluctance to use CALL and ICT", ReCALL, 11(1), pp.38~46 (1999)[DOI]
  19. Golonka, E. M., "Technologies for foreign language learning : A review of technology types and their effectiveness", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), pp.70~105 (2014)[DOI]
  20. Goode, J., "The digital identity divide : How technology knowledge impacts college students", New Media & Society, 12(3), pp.497~513 (2010)[DOI]
  21. Hatton, E., "Lévi-Strauss’s bricolage and theorizing teachers’ work", Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 20(2), pp.74~96 (1989)[DOI]
  22. Hubbard, P., "Five keys from the past to the future of CALL", International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 9(3), pp.1~13 (2019)[DOI]
  23. Isbell, D. R., "Online informal language learning : Insights from a Korean learning community", Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), pp.82~102 (2018)
  24. Joo, Y. J., "Examination of relationships among students’self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs", Computers & Education, 122, pp.260~272 (2018)[DOI]
  25. 데이빗 켄트, "Pilot Study for Use of Memrise Application by Korean Junior College Students Studying EFL Vocabulary in a Blended Learning Context", 영상영어교육, 14(3), pp.169~192 (2013), 영상영어교육학회[DOI]
  26. Kern, R., "Technology as Pharmakon : The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education", The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), pp.340~357 (2014)[DOI]
  27. Kessler, G., "Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward technology", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), pp.173~188 (2007)[DOI]
  28. Kincheloe, J. L., "The SAGE handbook of qualitative research", pp.163~177 (2011), SAGE
  29. Kohn, K., "Learner agency and non-native speaker identity in pedagogical lingua franca conversations : Insights from intercultural telecollaboration in foreign language education", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(5), pp.351~367 (2017)[DOI]
  30. Lai, C., "Technology and learner autonomy : An argument in favor of the nexus of formal and informal language learning", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, pp.52~58 (2019)[DOI]
  31. Lee, A. S., "Conceptualizing generalizability : New contributions and a reply", MIS Quarterly, 36(3), pp.749~761 (2012)[DOI]
  32. Levi-strauss, C., "The savage mind" (1966), University of Chicago Press
  33. Lim, C., "Open and distance education in Asia, Africa and the Middle East", pp.87~100 (2019), Springer
  34. Liu, Q., "CALL from an ecological perspective : How a teacher perceives affordance and fosters learner agency in a technology-mediated language classroom", ReCALL, 30(1), pp.68~87 (2018)[DOI]
  35. Lomicka, L., "Reframing technology’s role in language teaching : A retrospective report", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, pp.8~23 (2019)[DOI]
  36. Pezalla, A. E., "Researching the researcher-asinstrument : An exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity", Qualitative Research, 12(2), pp.165~185 (2012)[DOI]
  37. Pinch, T. J., "The social construction of facts and artefacts : Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other", Social Studies of Science, 14(3), pp.399~441 (1984)
  38. Ramsetty, A., "Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID-19", Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(7), pp.1147~1148 (2020)[DOI]
  39. Ryu, D., "Play to learn, learn to play : Language learning through gaming culture", ReCALL, 25(2), pp.286~301 (2013)[DOI]
  40. Scribner, J. P., "The problems of practice : Bricolage as a metaphor for teachers’work and learning", Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 51(4), pp.295~310 (2005)
  41. Sherman, B. J., "Agency, ideology, and information", communication technology:English language instructor use of instructional technology at a South Korean college, The Pennsylvania State University, 2016
  42. Shi, Z., "Mobile-assisted language learning using WeChat instant messaging", International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning(IJET), 12(2), pp.16~26 (2017)[DOI]
  43. Sun, Y. -C., "Voice blog : An exploratory study of language learning", Language Learning, 13(2), pp.88~103 (2009)
  44. van Dijk, J., "The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon", The Information Society, 19(4), pp.315~326 (2003)
  45. Warschauer, M., "Researching technology in TESOL : Determinist, instrumental, and critical approaches", TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), pp.757~761 (1998)[DOI]
  46. Waycott, J., "Digital divides? Student and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies", Computers & Education, 54(4), pp.1202~1211 (2010)[DOI]
  47. Winskel, H., "Smartphone use and study behavior : A Korean and Australian comparison", Heliyon, 5(7), pp.1~8 (2019)[DOI]
  48. Wright, S., "Technologies for learning? An actor-network theory critique of ‘affordances’ in research on mobile learning", Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), pp.247~258 (2011)[DOI]
  49. Wyatt, S., "The handbook of science and technology studies", pp.165~180 (2008), MIT Press
  50. Yin, R. K., "Case study research and applications: Design and methods" (2017), SAGE
  51. 윤서영, "Exploring Learner Perspectives on Learner Autonomy for Blended Learning in EFL Conversation Classes", 영상영어교육, 17(1), pp.197~220 (2016), 영상영어교육학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)