본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

中国新《证券法》下投资者保护之反思与重构

Reflection and Reconstruction of Investor Protection under China’s New Securities Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

新《证券法》在第六章专章规定了“投资者保护”,但其中规则的体系定位不明,内容逻辑混乱,甚至可能减损投资者保护的制度价值. 投资者保护是证券法的根本目标,应对证券法具体制度展开和规则设计起到统 摄作用,而非一个章节可以涵盖. 从证券法的基本原理而言,公开原则是实现投资者保护的手段. 公开原则有两个制度面向:信息披露制度和证券私人诉讼制度,二者共同构成了证券法的基石性制度. 新《证券法》下投资者保护之重构需要探析信息披露制度中增加的简明披露规则、同时披露规则和自愿披露规则对于普通投资者和专业投资者不同的制度性含义;同时,有必要扫清证券私人诉讼的司法障碍,为私人诉讼的开展提供激励,促进二元制度面向在投资者保护中的有机互动.

Abstract

China’s new Securities Law stipulates “Investor Protection” as the title of the sixth chapter, but the systematic position of the rules is unclear and the logic of the content is chaotic, which may even reduce the value of the investor protection in the Securities Law. Investor protection is the fundamental goal of securities laws. It should play a dominant role in the development of specific systems and rule design of it, rather than being covered by a single chapter. From the basic principles of the securities law, full disclosure is the means to realize investor protection. Full disclosure has two institutional aspects: the mandatory disclosure system and the private securities litigation system, which together constitute the cornerstone system of the securities law. The reconstruction of investor protection under China’s new Securities Law needs to explore the different institutional implications of the newly added “Plain Chinese rule”, “Equal-time rule”, and “Voluntary rule” in the mandatory disclosure system for ordinary investors and sophisticated investors; at the same time, it is necessary to remove the judicial obstacles in private securities litigation, provide incentives for the development of private litigation, and promote the interaction between the dual system in investor protection.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 范卫国, "从支持起诉到公益诉讼:新《证券法》实施下投资者权益保障的困境与出路", 金融法苑, (2) (2020)
  2. 耿利航, "欺诈市场理论反思", 法学研究, (6) (2020)
  3. 郭雳, "新"证券法"公平信息披露规则的问题与调适", 多层次资本市场研究, (2) (2020)
  4. 石佳友, "健全以公平为原则的产权保护论纲", 中国政法大学学报, (3) (2021)
  5. 魏俊, "证券法上的安全港及其制度价值——以前瞻性信息披露为例", 证券法苑, (12) (2014)
  6. 叶林, "冷静看待"证券法"专章规定‘投资者保护’", 多层次资本市场研究, (1) (2019)
  7. 张宇润, "论证券法"三公"原则的制度内涵", 法商研究, (5) (2002)
  8. 郑学勤, "从美国证券市场投资者保护制度谈起", 投资者, (2) (2018)
  9. 朱锦清, "证券法学", pp.79~ (2019), 北京大学出版社
  10. COFFEE, John C. Jr., "Market Failure and the Economic Case for A Mandatory Disclosure System", Virginia Law Review, 70, pp.717~ (1984)
  11. EASTERBROOK, Frank H., "Mandatory Disclosure and the Protection of Investors", Virginia Law Review, 70, pp.669~ (1984)
  12. FAIRFAX, Lisa M., "The Securities Law Implications of Financial Illiteracy", Virginia Law Review, 104(6), pp.1065~ (2018)
  13. GOSHEN, Zohar, "The Essential Role of Securities Regulation", Duke Law Journal,, 55, pp.720~732 (2006)
  14. HAEBERLE, Kevin S., "Making a Market for Corporate Disclosure", Yale Journal on Regulation, 35, pp.383~ (2018)
  15. HENDERSON, M. Todd, "Information-Dissemination Law:The Regulation of How Market-Moving Information Is Revealed", Cornell Law Review, 1, pp.1373~ (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)