본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

간편법을 이용한 액상화 평가 기준에 대한 고찰

Overview on Standards for Liquefaction Triggering Evaluation using the Simplified Method

김병민|김동수|김연준|고길완|MANANDHARSATISH
한국지진공학회|2020.09|한국지진공학회논문집 (Jorunal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)|제24권 제5호|pp. 197-209|DOI https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2020.24.5.197

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Simplified methodLiquefactionSeismic design codeTriggering evaluation
주제분류토목공학

초록

Evidence of liquefaction during the 2017 Pohang earthquake has highlighted the urgent need to evaluate the current seismic design standard for liquefaction in Korea, particularly the liquefaction triggering standard. With the simplified method, which is the most popular method for evaluating liquefaction triggering, the factor of safety for liquefaction triggering is calculated via the cyclic stress ratio (CSR) and the cyclic resistance ratio (CRR). The parameters in the CSR and CRR have undergone changes over time based on new research findings and lessons learned from liquefaction case-histories. Hence, the current design standard for liquefaction triggering evaluation in Korea should also reflect these changes to achieve seismic safety during future earthquakes. In this study, liquefaction susceptibility criteria were discussed initially and this was followed by a review of the current liquefaction triggering codes/guidelines in other countries and Korea. Next, the parameters associated with the CSR such as the maximum ground acceleration, stress reduction factor, magnitude scaling factor, and overburden correction factor were discussed in detail. Then, the evaluation of the CRR using the SPT N-value and CPT qc-value was elaborated along with overburden and clean-sand correction factors. Based on this review of liquefaction triggering evaluation standards, recommendations are made for improving the current seismic design standard related to liquefaction triggering in Korea.

Abstract

Evidence of liquefaction during the 2017 Pohang earthquake has highlighted the urgent need to evaluate the current seismic design standard for liquefaction in Korea, particularly the liquefaction triggering standard. With the simplified method, which is the most popular method for evaluating liquefaction triggering, the factor of safety for liquefaction triggering is calculated via the cyclic stress ratio (CSR) and the cyclic resistance ratio (CRR). The parameters in the CSR and CRR have undergone changes over time based on new research findings and lessons learned from liquefaction case-histories. Hence, the current design standard for liquefaction triggering evaluation in Korea should also reflect these changes to achieve seismic safety during future earthquakes. In this study, liquefaction susceptibility criteria were discussed initially and this was followed by a review of the current liquefaction triggering codes/guidelines in other countries and Korea. Next, the parameters associated with the CSR such as the maximum ground acceleration, stress reduction factor, magnitude scaling factor, and overburden correction factor were discussed in detail. Then, the evaluation of the CRR using the SPT N-value and CPT qc-value was elaborated along with overburden and clean-sand correction factors. Based on this review of liquefaction triggering evaluation standards, recommendations are made for improving the current seismic design standard related to liquefaction triggering in Korea.

참고문헌 (65)

  1. Seed HB, "Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential", J. of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Devision, 97(9), pp.1249~1273 (1971)
  2. Youd TL, "Liquefaction resistance of soils : Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER", NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils, 2001, pp.127(10), 817~833
  3. Kayen RE, "Shear-Wave velocity-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(3), pp.407~419 (2013)
  4. Andrus RD, "Guide for shear-wavebased liquefaction potential evaluation", Earthquake Spectra, 20(2), pp.285~308 (2004)
  5. Park DS, "Liquefaction evaluation procedure using SPT", Magazine of the Korean Geotechnical Society, 30(6), pp.8~22 (2014)
  6. 서민우, "액상화 가능 지수를 이용한 국내 서해안 지역의 액상화 평가", 한국지진공학회논문집, 13(4), pp.1~13 (2009), 한국지진공학회
  7. 만도카일 사이둘라, "반복단순전단시험에 기반한 조립토의 설계 액상화 저항 곡선 개발", 한국지반공학회논문집, 32(6), pp.49~59 (2016), 한국지반공학회[DOI]
  8. 백우현, "지진시나리오 기반의 포항지역 액상화위험도 작성 연구", 한국지진공학회논문집, 22(3), pp.219~224 (2018), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
  9. Iwasaki T, "A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan", Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Microzonation Safer Construction Research and Application, 2, pp.885~896 (1978)
  10. 안재광, "1차원 유효응력개념의 지반응답해석을 통한 포항지진의 액상화 현상 규명", 한국지반공학회논문집, 34(8), pp.37~49 (2018), 한국지반공학회[DOI]
  11. 유병수, "국내 액상화 평가를 위한 진동전단응력비 산정", 한국지반공학회논문집, 35(6), pp.5~15 (2019), 한국지반공학회[DOI]
  12. 박성식, "포항모래의 액상화 저항 특성에 관한 연구", 한국지반공학회논문집, 34(9), pp.5~17 (2018), 한국지반공학회[DOI]
  13. 봉태호, "CPT 기반 액상화 평가를 위한 포항지역 세립분 함량 예측 및 변동성 평가", 한국지반공학회논문집, 35(3), pp.37~46 (2019), 한국지반공학회[DOI]
  14. 송성완, "전단저항강도비 산정 방법에 따른 액상화 평가의 변화", 한국지반환경공학회 논문집, 21(1), pp.13~19 (2020), 한국지반환경공학회[DOI]
  15. 장영은, "국내 액상화 평가를 위한 지진파 선정", 한국지진공학회논문집, 24(2), pp.111~119 (2020), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
  16. New Zealand Geotechnical Society INC, "Earthquake Geotechincial Engineering. Earthquake geotechnical engineering modulue 3 -liquefaction hazards", Ministery of Buisness Innovation and Employment, ~ (2006)
  17. LRFD seismic analysis and deisgn of bridges (Reference manual), "Marsh ML", FHWA, ~, pp.FHWA NHI-15-004 (2014)
  18. JRA, "5 Seismic Deisgn Guide specification for highway bridges, the commentary", Japan road association, ~ (2012)
  19. Recommended procedures for implementation of DMG special publication 117 guidelines for analyzing and mitigating liquefaction hazard in California, "Martin G", The Southern California Earthquake Center, ~ (1999)
  20. NEHRP Recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures, "FEMA", Federal Emergency Management Agency, ~, pp.FEMA P-750 (2009)
  21. "Eurocode 8 : Design of Stuructures for Earthquake Resistance. Part5. Foundations, Retaining Structures, Geotechnical Aspect", CEM, ~ (2004)
  22. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT), "Technical standards and commentaries for port and harbour facilities in Japan", Japan Port and Harbour Association, ~ (2009)
  23. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), "Guidelines for evaluating and improving earthquake resistance of existing facilities (Foudation and ground)", Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, ~ (2020)
  24. Youd TL, "Liquefaction susceptibility and geologic setting", Proceedings of 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 3, pp.2189~2197 (1977), Prentice-Hall
  25. Youd TL, "Mapping of liquefaction induced ground failure potential", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, 104(4), pp.433~446 (1978)
  26. Youd TL, "International Handbook on Earthquake and Engineering Seismology Part B", pp.1159~1173 (2003), Academic
  27. Boulanger RW, "Liquefaction susceptibility criteria for silts and clays", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132(11), pp.1413~1426 (2006)
  28. Bray JD, "Assessment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132(9), pp.1165~1177 (2006)
  29. Wang WS, "Some findings in soil liquefaction", Water Conservancy and Hydroeletric Power Scientific Research Institute, pp.55~63 (1979)
  30. Cetin KO, "Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(12), pp.1314~1340 (2004)
  31. Idriss IM, "Soil liquefaction during earthquakes" (2008), Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
  32. CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures, "Boulanger RW", Center for Geotechnical Modeling Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Davis, ~ (2014)
  33. Cetin KO, "SPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction triggering hazard", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 115, pp.698~709 (2018)
  34. Moss RE, "CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 132(8), pp.1032~1051 (2006)
  35. Cyclic liquefaction and its evaluation based on the SPT and CPT, "Robertson PK", National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, 41~88 (1997)
  36. Sensitivity of predicted liquefaction induced lateral displacements from the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes, "Robinson K", University of Canterbury, ~ (2013)
  37. Seed HB, "Design problems in soil liquefaction", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 113(8), pp.827~845 (1987)
  38. Iai S, "A liquefaction criterion based on field performances around seismograph stations", Soils and Foundations, 29(2), pp.52~68 (1989)
  39. A new criterion for assessing liquefaction potential using grain size accumulation curve and N-value, "Iai S", Port and Harbour Research Institute, 125~234 (1986)
  40. 배성진, "2016년 경주지진파의 특성: 지진파예측모델들과의 비교", 한국방재학회논문집, 18(1), pp.57~67 (2018), 한국방재학회[DOI]
  41. Transportation Research Board (TRB), "TRB workshop on new approaches to liquefaction analysis. Publ. No. FHWA-RD-99-165", Federal Highway Administration, ~ (1999)
  42. Liao SS, "Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand", Journal of Geotechnical engineering, 112(3), pp.373~377 (1986)
  43. Kishida T, "Seismic response of levees in Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta", Earthquake Spectra, 25(3), pp.557~582 (2009)
  44. Kavazanjian E, "State of the art and practice in the assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction and its Consequences", pp.350~ (2016), The National Academies Press
  45. Seed HB, "Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance Data", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 109(3), pp.458~542 (1983)
  46. Hynes ME, "Influence of confining stress on liquefaction resistance" (1999), NIST SPECIAL PUBLICATION
  47. Boulanger RW, "High overburden stress effects in liquefaction analyses", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(12), pp.1071~1082 (2003)
  48. Ladd RS, "Specimen preparation and liquefaction of sand", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 100(GT10), pp.1180~1184 (1974)
  49. Ladd RS, "Specimen preparation and cyclic stability of sands", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 103(GT6), pp.535~547 (1977)
  50. The effects of method of sample preparation on the cyclic stress-strain behavior of sands, "Mulilis JP", University of California at Berkeley, ~, pp.Technical Report EERC 75 (1975), 18
  51. Mulilis JP, "Effects of sample preparation and sand liquefaction", Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 103(GT2), pp.99~108 (1977)
  52. Tatsuoka F, "Method of evaluating liquefaction potential and its application", Ministry of Education of Japan, ~ (1990)
  53. Robertson PK, "Cone penetration testing for geotechnical engineering", Gregg Drill-ing and Testing Inc, ~ (2012)
  54. SPT-based liquefaction triggering procedures, "Idriss IM", Center for Geotechnical Modeling Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California, ~ (2010)
  55. Idriss IM, "Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26, pp.130~151 (2006)
  56. Robertson PK, "Soil classification using CPT", Canadian Geotechnical Journal, (1), pp.151~158 (1990)
  57. Seed HB, "Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 111(12), pp.1425~1445 (1985)
  58. Van Ballegooy S, "Assessment of liquefaction-induced land damage for residential Christchurch", Earthquake Spectra, 30(1), pp.31~55 (2014)
  59. Green RA, "Select liquefaction case histories from the 2010-2011canterbury earthquake sequence", Earthquake Spectra, 30(1), pp.131~153 (2014)
  60. Tokimatsu K, "Liquefaction-induced damage to buildings in Urayasu city during the 2011 Tohoku Pacific earthquake. German", Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, pp.665~674 (2012)
  61. Cox BR, "Liquefaction at strong motion stations and in Urayasu City during the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake", Earthquake Spectra, 29(1), pp.55~80 (2011)
  62. Evaluation of the cone penetrometer test for SPT liquefaction assessment, "Douglas BJ", Fugro, Inc, ~ (1981)
  63. Shibata T, "Evaluation of liquefaction potentials of soils using cone penetration tests", Soils and Foundations, 28(2), pp.49~60 (1988)
  64. Differential movement at the embankment, "structure interface-mitigation and rehabilitation", Stark TD, 1995
  65. CPT-based liquefaction field case histories from the 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu (Kobe) earthquake, "Suzuki Y", The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center’s (PEER), ~ (2003)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)

1-G 진동대 실험을 이용한 시트파일 보강재의 액상화 및 피해 방지 효과윤종찬, 김진만, 손수원, 심성훈pp. 211-217Slip-Weakening 모델의 확장과 단층 파열속도의 추정윤병익, 최항pp. 219-232철골 모멘트골조로 보강된 철근콘크리트 건물의 내진성능평가김선웅pp. 233-241
원문 보기