본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

비탄성변위비를 이용한 능력 스펙트럼법

Capacity Spectrum Method Based on Inelastic Displacement Ratio

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류토목공학

초록

본 연구에서는 중고층 건물과 같이 고차모드의 영향이 커지는 구조물의 지진에 대한 성능점을 간략하고 정확하게 구할 수 있는 개선된 능력스펙트럼법을 제안한다. 능력스펙트럼법은 주어진 지진의 응답스펙트럼과 다자유도 구조물을 변환한 등가 단자유도 시스템을 이용하여 지진으로 인하여 발생하는 지붕층의 최대 비탄성변위를 간략하게 구하는 방법이다. 제안된 방법에서는 구조물의 탄성 및 비탄성 동적해석을 수행하지 않고, 기존의 능력스펙트럼법에서 요구되는 정적푸쉬오버해석과 탄성변위를 이용하여 비탄성변위를 예측하는데, 기존 연구에서 개발한 CR 을 이용한다. 본 연구는 제안한 방법의 정확도를 평가하기 위해 LA 지역의 3, 9, 20층 철골모멘트저항 골조를 선택한다. 이 건물들의 지진에 대한 각 층별 최대 층간변위비를 개발한 CSM으로 구하고, 이를 비선형 응답이력해석(NL-RHA)으로 구한 결과와 비교하였다. 사용한 지진은 재현주기 475년과 2475년의 위험수준에 대한 각각 20개의 지진집단들이다. 또한 본 연구에서는 ATC-40에 제시된 CSM 방법과 N2 방법으로 구한 각 건물의 최대 층간변위비도 비교한다. 개발된 CSM은 기존에 개발된 방법에 비하여 보다 정확한 최대 층간변위비를 예측하는 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

In this study, improved capacity spectrum method (CSM) is proposed. The method can account for higher mode contribution to the seismic response of MDOF systems. The CSM has been conveniently used for determining maximum roof displacement using both demand spectrum and capacity curve of equivalent SDOF system. Unlike the conventional CSM, the maximum roof displacement is determined without iteration using inelastic displacement ratio and R factor calculated from demand spectrum and capacity curve. Three moment resisting steel frames of 3-,9- and 20-stories are considered to test the accuracy of the proposed method. Nonlinear response history analysis (NL-RHA) for three frames is also conducted, which is considered as an exact solution. SAC LA 10/50 and 2/50 sets of ground motions are used. Moreover, this study estimates maximum story drift ratios (IDR) using ATC-40 CSM and N2-method and compared with those from the proposed method and NL-RHA. It shows that the proposed CSM estimates the maximum IDR accurately better than the previous methods.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Applied Technology Council, "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings" (1996), Report ATC-40
  2. Federal Emergency Management Agency, "NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings" (1997), Report FEMA 273 (Guidelines) and Report. 274 (Commentary)
  3. Nassar, A. A., "Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems" (1991), The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center
  4. Gupta, A., "Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures" (1999), The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center
  5. Miranda, E., "Estimation of inelastic deformation demands of SDOF systems", pp.1005~1012 (2001), Journal of Structural Engineering
  6. Kim, S., "Push-over analysis procedure in earthquake engineering", Earthquake Spectra, 15(3), pp.417~434 (1999)
  7. H. Krawinkler, "Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation", Engineering Structures, 20, pp.452~464 (1998)
  8. 02, "Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures : SDF systems, Report PEER-1999", pp.1999, Chopra, A. K.
  9. Fajfar, P., "Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28, pp.979~993 (1999)
  10. Fajfar, P., "A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design", Earthquake Spectra, 16(3), pp.573~592 (2000)
  11. Freeman, S. A., "Review of the development of the capacity spectrum method", ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 41(1), pp.1~13 (2004)
  12. Chopra, A. K., "Statistics of SDF-systems estimate of roof displacement for pushover analysis of building" (2001), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center
  13. Chopra, A. K, "A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for buildings : theory and preliminary evaluation" (2001), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center
  14. Chintanapakdee, C., "Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32, pp.417~442 (2003)
  15. Chopra, A. K., "Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands", Earthquake Spectra, 20(3), pp.757~778 (2004)
  16. Goel, R. K., "Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses : SAC buildings", Earthquake Spectra, 20(1), pp.225~254 (2004)
  17. Goel, R. K., "Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover procedures using strong-motion records of buildings", Earthquake Spectra, 21(3), pp.653~684 (2005)
  18. 한상환, "이선형 단자유도 감쇠시스템의 비탄성변위비", 한국지진공학회논문집, 11(6), pp.53~61 (2007), 한국지진공학회
  19. Chopra, A. K., "Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering" (2001), Prentice Hall
  20. Prakash, V., "Drain-2DX base program description and user guide ver 1.10" (1993), Earthquake Engineering Research Center (EERC)
  21. Prakash, V., "Drain-2DX element description and user guide ver 1.10" (1993), Earthquake Engineering Research Center (EERC)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)