본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국정부의 역사발전 관점에 따른 몽골민족 정책 -떵샤오핑(鄧小平) 시대 중앙정부의 내몽골민족정책을 중심으로-

Research on the Mongol Minority Policy of the Chinese Government in the perspective of the historical development - Focused on the Chinese Minority Policy toward Inner Mongolia in the Deng Xiaoping era-

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

It is the purpose of this research to examine the minority policy toward Inner Mongolian Autonomy Resion(IMAR) of the Beijing during the Deng Xiaoping era. The analysis is concentrated on the conflict abd compromise between Beijing and IMAR under the chinese Open Policy. The minority policy of the Mao Zedong was characterized ideological integrations, but Deng Xiaoping was always emphasized economic development policy. Mainly Mao enforced minority self-determination’s policy, Deng brought highly autonomous policy. In the case of IMAR, conflict between Beijing and Inner Mongolian was often happened in the Mao era, but compromise in the field of economic development was noted in the Deng period. Normally Deng’s Open Policy and economic development was positively evaluated. Was it real??In this research, therefore, it is find out the legacu of the Beijing ‘s minority policy and the ultimate policy toward IMAR. Tha fact is that Brijing implemented two ways policy to the IMAR. First of all, Beijing has been forced agricultural policy to the nomadic Mongolian. Than means Inner Mongolian will lost their cultural identity. Secondly Beijing pressed “多元一體” policy, which make the Inner Mongolian and other chinese minority a part of an China in the various field. This research, eventually read between the lines of the chinese policy to the IMAR in the Deng’s era.

Abstract

It is the purpose of this research to examine the minority policy toward Inner Mongolian Autonomy Resion(IMAR) of the Beijing during the Deng Xiaoping era. The analysis is concentrated on the conflict abd compromise between Beijing and IMAR under the chinese Open Policy. The minority policy of the Mao Zedong was characterized ideological integrations, but Deng Xiaoping was always emphasized economic development policy. Mainly Mao enforced minority self-determination’s policy, Deng brought highly autonomous policy. In the case of IMAR, conflict between Beijing and Inner Mongolian was often happened in the Mao era, but compromise in the field of economic development was noted in the Deng period. Normally Deng’s Open Policy and economic development was positively evaluated. Was it real??In this research, therefore, it is find out the legacu of the Beijing ‘s minority policy and the ultimate policy toward IMAR. Tha fact is that Brijing implemented two ways policy to the IMAR. First of all, Beijing has been forced agricultural policy to the nomadic Mongolian. Than means Inner Mongolian will lost their cultural identity. Secondly Beijing pressed “多元一體” policy, which make the Inner Mongolian and other chinese minority a part of an China in the various field. This research, eventually read between the lines of the chinese policy to the IMAR in the Deng’s era.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. "关于建国以来党的若干历史问题的决议" (1979)[URL]
  2. "民族政策文件汇编"第二编"[URL]
  3. "中國人權硏究會"[URL]
  4. "内蒙古政报"编辑部主办" (1996)[URL]
  5. "中国的少数民族政策及其实践"[URL]
  6. "아주경제뉴스"[URL]
  7. 楊建新, "中國少數民族通論" (2005), 民族出版社
  8. 羅開雲, "中國少數民族革命史" (2003), 中國社會科學出版社
  9. 鄧力群, "當代中國的內蒙古" (1992), 當代中國出版社
  10. 林蔚然, "內蒙古自治區經濟發展史" (1990), 內蒙古人民出版社
  11. 馬大正, "中國古代邊疆政策硏究" (1990), 中國社會科學出版社
  12. 周良宵, "忽必烈" (1986), 吉林敎育出版社
  13. 정재남, "중국의 소수민족" (2008), 살림
  14. 김선호, "중국 내몽골자치구 오르도스 지역사회의 몽골 문화적 특징 분석-역사적 배경과 교육 및 유목경제를 중심으로-", 몽골학, 0(24), pp.269~290 (2008), 한국몽골학회
  15. 김선호, "4.3회의와 內蒙古자치정부 성립과정 연구", 중앙아시아연구, (1) (1996), 한국중앙아시아학회
  16. 김정계, "중국의 중앙과 지방관계론: 집권과 분권의 변증법" (2008), 평민사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)