설계용 탄성응답스펙트럼으로 규준화된 인공지진동과 기록지진동의 비선형 지진응답
Nonlinear Seismic Estimates of Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions Normalized by the Seismic Design Spectrum
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
비선형 시간이력응답해석에서 입력지진동은 구조물의 탄소성 지진응답을 결정짓는 중요한 요소이다. 시간이력해석에 사용되는 기록지진동파형은 지진발생 메카니즘, 전달경로, 지반의 성질에 따른 여러 가지 인자가 복잡하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 구조물의 지진응답해석에 사용될 일반성을 갖는 입력지진동을 선정하는 것은 매우 어려운 문제이다. 본 논문은 실무에서 내진설계용 지진동으로 가장 선호하지 않는 입력지진동을 선정하여 인공지진동파형을 작성하였다. 인공지진동은 기록지진동과 동일한 위상각을 가지며, 감쇠정수 h=5%일 때의 설계용 스펙트럼과 거의 일치하도록 작성되었다. 기록지지동과 인공지진동을 입력한 1자유도계의 탄성 및 탄소성 지진응답해석을 수행하여 탄소성 응답스펙트럼 및 입력에너지 응답 특성을 분석하였다. 본 연구에서 작성된 인공지진동은 건축구조물의 탄소성 지진응답해석용 입력지진동으로 충분히 타당성이 있다고 사료된다.
Abstract
In the nonlinear response history analysis of building structures, the input ground accelerations have considerable effect on the nonlinear response characteristics of structural systems. As the properties of the ground motion, using time history analysis, are interrelated with many factors such as the fault mechanism, the seismic wave propagation from source to site, and the amplification characteristics of the soil, it is difficult to properly select the input ground motions for seismic response analysis. In this paper, the most unfavourable real seismic design ground motions were selected as input motions. The artificial earthquake waves were generated according to these earthquake events. The artificial waves have identical phase angles to the recorded earthquake waves, and their overall response spectra are compatible with the seismic design spectrum with 5% of critical viscous damping. It is concluded that the artificial earthquake waves simulated in this paper are applicable as input ground motions for a seismic response analysis of building structures.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김재관, "구조동역학(Chapter 7), 제2판", pp.308~328 (2004), 피어션에듀케인션코리아
- 日本建築學會, "地震荷重-その現狀と將來の展望" (1987)
- 日本建築學會, "地震荷重-地震動の予測と建築物の應答" (1992)
- 理論地震動硏究會, "地震動一その合成と波形處理" (1994), 鹿島出版會
- Naeim, F., "On the Use of Design Spectrum Compatible Time Histories", Earthquake Spectra, 11(1), pp.111~127 (1995)
- Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design, "Stewart, J.P.", PEERC, University of California, ~, pp.PEER-2001 (2001), 09
- Kurama Y.C., "Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(15), pp.2423~2450 (2003)
- Moehle J.P., "Seismic analysis, design, and review for tall buildings", The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 15, pp.495~513 (2006)
- Aschheim M., "The scaled nonlinear dynamic procedure", Engineering Structures, 29, pp.1422~1441 (2007)
- Luco N., "Does amplitude scaling of ground motion records result in biased nonlinear structural drift responses", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36, pp.1813~1835 (2007)
- Chang-Hai Zhai, "A new approach of selecting real input ground motions for seismic design: The most unfavourable real seismic design ground motions", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36, pp.1009~1027 (2007)
- Hancock, J., "Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, pp.1585~1607 (2008)
- Evaluation Ground Motion Selection and Modification Methods: Predicting Median Interstory Drift Response of Buildings, "PEER Ground Motion Selection and Modification Working Group", PEER, University of California, ~, pp.PEER-2009 (2009), 01
- Dae-Han Jun, "Seismic Response of R", C Structures Subjected to Simulated Ground Motions Compatible with Design Spectrum, 2010, ~[DOI]
- Ohsaki, Y., "On the Significance of Phase Content in Earthquake Ground Motions", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 7, pp.427~439 (1979)
- 대한건축학회, "건축구조기준 및 해설", pp.122~131 (2009), 기문당