본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소규모 철근콘크리트 건축물을 위한 비선형해석 프로그램 비교 I

Comparison of Nonlinear Analysis Programs for Small-size Reinforced Concrete Buildings I

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류토목공학

초록

For small-size reinforce-concrete buildings, Midas Gen, OpenSees, and Perform-3D, which are structural analysis programs that are most popularly used at present, were applied for nonlinear static pushover analysis, and then difference between those programs was analyzed. Example buildings were limited to 2-story frames only and frames with one or more rectangular walls. Analysis results showed that there was not much difference for frames only based on capacity curves. There were some differences for frames with rectangular walls, but it was not so significant. The global behaviors represented by the capacity curve were not so different, but the feature of each analysis program appeared when the results were analyzed in more detail. Therefore, the program users should understand the feature of the program well, and then conduct performance assessment. The result of this study is limited to low-story frames only and frames with rectangular walls so that it should be noted that it is possible to get different results for frames with non-rectangular walls or mid- to high-rise buildings.

Abstract

For small-size reinforce-concrete buildings, Midas Gen, OpenSees, and Perform-3D, which are structural analysis programs that are most popularly used at present, were applied for nonlinear static pushover analysis, and then difference between those programs was analyzed. Example buildings were limited to 2-story frames only and frames with one or more rectangular walls. Analysis results showed that there was not much difference for frames only based on capacity curves. There were some differences for frames with rectangular walls, but it was not so significant. The global behaviors represented by the capacity curve were not so different, but the feature of each analysis program appeared when the results were analyzed in more detail. Therefore, the program users should understand the feature of the program well, and then conduct performance assessment. The result of this study is limited to low-story frames only and frames with rectangular walls so that it should be noted that it is possible to get different results for frames with non-rectangular walls or mid- to high-rise buildings.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. "MIDAS GEN User’s Manual. ver 785. MIDAS IT;", ~ (2010)
  2. "Open simulation for earthquake engineering"[URL]
  3. CSI, "Perform-3D, Nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3D structures, user guide version 4", Computers and Structures Inc, 336~ (2006)
  4. "FEMA356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", Federal Emergency Management Agency, 518~ (2000)
  5. CSI, "Perform components & elements version 4", Computers and Structures Inc, 270~ (2006)
  6. AIK, "KBC 2009, Korean building code-structural", Korea:Architectural Institute of Korea, 772~ (2009)
  7. 김태완, "조적채움벽 및 허리벽이 학교 건물 내진 성능에 미치는 영향에 대한 해석적 연구", 한국지진공학회논문집, 17(5), pp.197~207 (2013), 한국지진공학회
  8. KISC, "Guidelines for seismic performance evaluation and rehabilitation of existing buildings", Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation, 120~ (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)