카단(Qadan)의 고려 침입 전후(前後) 상황과 고려․대원올로스 연합군의 대응
A Situation Before and After Qadan’s Invasion of Koryŏ and a Response of the Allied Forces between Koryŏ․Dayuan(大元) ulus
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined specifically about what the cause and purpose of the Qadan(哈丹) faction’s invasion of Koryŏ and about a countermeasure of the Koryŏ Royal Court and the Dayuan(大元) ulus following the invasion of Koryŏ. The rebellion by the Princes of Eastern ulus under Nayan(乃顔) turned out a failure in 1287. But Qadan, who rallied the remnants of the party, continued to proceed with the revolt. Qadan’s insurrection can be divided largely into two things. In the first place, it is the period of having fought back Dayuan ulus in the eastern parts of Mongolia with succeeding to Nayan’s uprising. It belongs to the term between the year in 1287 with the beginning of Nayan’s rebellion and the year in 1289. The Princes of Eastern ulus who are being based in eastern Mongolia such as Nayan and Qadan played a great role in Qubilai's reign. However, Qubilai's walking after seizing the power of the Great Khan was what strengthened the centralization of power and controlled the decentralization through the Branch Secretariats(xing zhongshusheng, 行中書省). It was experienced that Nayan was killed in a failed revolt and that the forces under his command were scattered. Yet Qadan and his factions, who judged that there is nothing but to lose the control and the power in eastern Mongolia, which had been continued for generations since the Genghis Khan period, could not help keeping challenging the Great Khan Qubilai. In the second period, the rebellion activity in eastern Mongolia resulted in having been blocked by the Dayuan ulus army. And the Qadan power that took a big hit ended in entering Koryŏ with invasion. The Qadan power that attacked to enter Koryŏ in the 16th year of King Chungnyeol(忠烈王) was enough to restore nightmare on the former Yeke Mongol ulus’s invasion of Koryŏ. The invasion of Koryŏ by the Mongolian Armed Forces was threatening enough for the Koryŏ Royal Court to have planned ‘relocation of the government to Gang’hwa’ once again as soon as they invaded and came in. Nevertheless, a relationship between Koryŏ and Dayuan ulus during the reign of King Chungnyeol was close, thereby having militarily had a very cooperative relationship such as what both sides mutually lavish the military support arms. The Qadan army, which had advanced southward to Wonju and Chungju regions from northeastern Koryŏ, was finally destroyed in Yeongi area in May of 1291 by the allied forces between Koryŏ·Mongolia.
Abstract
This study examined specifically about what the cause and purpose of the Qadan(哈丹) faction’s invasion of Koryŏ and about a countermeasure of the Koryŏ Royal Court and the Dayuan(大元) ulus following the invasion of Koryŏ. The rebellion by the Princes of Eastern ulus under Nayan(乃顔) turned out a failure in 1287. But Qadan, who rallied the remnants of the party, continued to proceed with the revolt. Qadan’s insurrection can be divided largely into two things. In the first place, it is the period of having fought back Dayuan ulus in the eastern parts of Mongolia with succeeding to Nayan’s uprising. It belongs to the term between the year in 1287 with the beginning of Nayan’s rebellion and the year in 1289. The Princes of Eastern ulus who are being based in eastern Mongolia such as Nayan and Qadan played a great role in Qubilai's reign. However, Qubilai's walking after seizing the power of the Great Khan was what strengthened the centralization of power and controlled the decentralization through the Branch Secretariats(xing zhongshusheng, 行中書省). It was experienced that Nayan was killed in a failed revolt and that the forces under his command were scattered. Yet Qadan and his factions, who judged that there is nothing but to lose the control and the power in eastern Mongolia, which had been continued for generations since the Genghis Khan period, could not help keeping challenging the Great Khan Qubilai. In the second period, the rebellion activity in eastern Mongolia resulted in having been blocked by the Dayuan ulus army. And the Qadan power that took a big hit ended in entering Koryŏ with invasion. The Qadan power that attacked to enter Koryŏ in the 16th year of King Chungnyeol(忠烈王) was enough to restore nightmare on the former Yeke Mongol ulus’s invasion of Koryŏ. The invasion of Koryŏ by the Mongolian Armed Forces was threatening enough for the Koryŏ Royal Court to have planned ‘relocation of the government to Gang’hwa’ once again as soon as they invaded and came in. Nevertheless, a relationship between Koryŏ and Dayuan ulus during the reign of King Chungnyeol was close, thereby having militarily had a very cooperative relationship such as what both sides mutually lavish the military support arms. The Qadan army, which had advanced southward to Wonju and Chungju regions from northeastern Koryŏ, was finally destroyed in Yeongi area in May of 1291 by the allied forces between Koryŏ·Mongolia.
참고문헌 (27)
- "高麗史", ~
- "高麗史節要", ~
- "元史" (1976), 中華書局
- 李齊賢, "益齋亂藁", ~
- 라시드 앗 딘, "부족지" (2002), 사계절
- 라시드 앗 딘, "칭기스칸기" (2003), 사계절
- 라시드 앗 딘, "칸의 후예들" (2005), 사계절
- 고명수, "몽골-고려 관계 연구" (2019), 혜안
- 김호동, "몽골제국과 세계사의 탄생』" (2010), 돌베개
- 燕岐大捷硏究, "윤용혁", 공주대박물관, ~ (1994)
- 윤은숙, "몽골제국의 만주 지배사" (2010), 소나무
- 邱樹森, "元史辭典" (2002), 山東敎育出版社
- 李治安, "元代分封制度硏究" (2007), 中華書局
- 李治安, "行省制度硏究" (2000), 南開大學出版社
- 薛磊, "元代東北統治硏究" (2012), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 류병재, "동·서 올로스 반란에 대한 쿠빌라이의 대응 ― 나얀과 카이도의 난을 중심으로 ―", 몽골학, (34), pp.133~179 (2013), 한국몽골학회[DOI]
- 신호철, "합단적의 침입과 원충갑의 영원성(치악성) 승첩" (1998)
- 尹銀淑, "쿠빌라이칸의 중앙집권화에 대한 東道諸王들의 대응―‘나얀 반란’을 중심으로―", 중앙아시아연구, 8, pp.2~52 (2003), 중앙아시아학회
- 의 치악성 침입과 원충갑의 항전, "한국사상과 문화", 2000, ~
- 주채혁, "쿠빌라이칸의 중앙집권화에 대한 카단宗王軍의 항전과 고려 鴒原山城 討伐戰", 江原人文論叢, 8 (2000)
- 吉野正史, "ナヤンの乱における元朝軍の陣容", 早稲田大学大学院文学研究科紀要, 4(54) (2008)
- 吉野正史, "元朝にとってのナヤン カダアンの乱-二つの乱における元朝軍の編成を手がかりとして-", 史観, 161 (2009)
- 楊德華, "元代叛王哈丹下落考", 雲南師範大學學報 : 哲學社會科學版, (6) (1995)
- 張泰湘, "試論乃顏之亂", 民族研究, (2) (1986)
- 周喜峰, "元代黑龍江地區的乃顏 哈丹叛亂", 奮鬥, (7) (2019)
- 叢佩遠, "元初乃顏 哈丹之亂", 社會科學戰線, (3) (1993)
- 畢奧南, "乃顏—哈丹事件與元麗關系", 內蒙古社會科學, (3) (1997)
