본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국내 중규모 지진에 대한 계측진도 추정식 연구

Study on the Relations to Estimate Instrumental Seismic Intensities for the Moderate Earthquakes in South Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류토목공학

초록

Recent two moderate earthquakes (2016 Mw=5.4 Gyeongju and 2017 Mw=5.5 Pohang) in Korea provided the unique chance of developing a set of relations to estimate instrumental seismic intensity in Korea by augmenting the time-history data from MMI seismic intensity regions above Ⅴ to the insufficient data previously accumulated from the MMI regions limited up to Ⅳ. The MMI intensity regions of Ⅴ and Ⅵ was identified by delineating the epicentral distance from the reference intensity statistics in distance derived by using the integrated MMI data obtained by combining the intensity survey results of KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration) and ‘DYFI (Did You Feel It)’ MMIs of USGS. The time-histories of the seismic stations from the MMI intensity regions above Ⅴ were then preprocessed by applying the previously developed site-correction filters to be converted to a site-equivalent condition in a manner consistent with the previous study. The average values of the ground-motion parameters for the three ground motion parameters of PGA, PGV and BSPGA (Bracketed Summation of PGA per second for 30 seconds) were calculated for the MMI=Ⅴ and Ⅵ and used to generate the dataset of the average values of the ground-motion parameters for the individual MMIs fromⅠ to Ⅵ. Based on this dataset, the linear regression analysis resulted in the following relations with proposed valid ranges of MMI. MMI = 2.36 × log10(PGA(gal)) + 1.44 (Ⅰ≤ MMI < Ⅶ ) MMI = 2.44 × log10(PGV(kine)) + 4.86 (Ⅰ≤ MMI < Ⅹ ) MMI = 2.59 × log10(BSPGA(gal․sec)) - 1.02 (Ⅰ≤ MMI < Ⅶ~Ⅷ ) Comparison with other empirical relations developed for the various seismological environments such as western, central, and eastern U.S. leads to the conclusion that the PGV-MMI relation above can be reasonably extrapolated to the MMI up to Ⅹ beyond the observed MMI limit of Ⅵ, while the PGA-MMI is only valid up to Ⅶ. An explanatory interpretation was also tried for the obvious difference of the MMI attenuation pattern in distance between the two moderate earthquakes by introducing the crustal structure with Conrad discontinuity, depth-varying Q-values and the relevant wave phases.

Abstract

Recent two moderate earthquakes (2016 Mw=5.4 Gyeongju and 2017 Mw=5.5 Pohang) in Korea provided the unique chance of developing a set of relations to estimate instrumental seismic intensity in Korea by augmenting the time-history data from MMI seismic intensity regions above Ⅴ to the insufficient data previously accumulated from the MMI regions limited up to Ⅳ. The MMI intensity regions of Ⅴ and Ⅵ was identified by delineating the epicentral distance from the reference intensity statistics in distance derived by using the integrated MMI data obtained by combining the intensity survey results of KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration) and ‘DYFI (Did You Feel It)’ MMIs of USGS. The time-histories of the seismic stations from the MMI intensity regions above Ⅴ were then preprocessed by applying the previously developed site-correction filters to be converted to a site-equivalent condition in a manner consistent with the previous study. The average values of the ground-motion parameters for the three ground motion parameters of PGA, PGV and BSPGA (Bracketed Summation of PGA per second for 30 seconds) were calculated for the MMI=Ⅴ and Ⅵ and used to generate the dataset of the average values of the ground-motion parameters for the individual MMIs fromⅠ to Ⅵ. Based on this dataset, the linear regression analysis resulted in the following relations with proposed valid ranges of MMI. MMI = 2.36 × log10(PGA(gal)) + 1.44 (Ⅰ≤ MMI < Ⅶ ) MMI = 2.44 × log10(PGV(kine)) + 4.86 (Ⅰ≤ MMI < Ⅹ ) MMI = 2.59 × log10(BSPGA(gal․sec)) - 1.02 (Ⅰ≤ MMI < Ⅶ~Ⅷ ) Comparison with other empirical relations developed for the various seismological environments such as western, central, and eastern U.S. leads to the conclusion that the PGV-MMI relation above can be reasonably extrapolated to the MMI up to Ⅹ beyond the observed MMI limit of Ⅵ, while the PGA-MMI is only valid up to Ⅶ. An explanatory interpretation was also tried for the obvious difference of the MMI attenuation pattern in distance between the two moderate earthquakes by introducing the crustal structure with Conrad discontinuity, depth-varying Q-values and the relevant wave phases.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 연관희, "국내 지진의 진도별 가속도 푸리에스펙트럼 통계모델", 한국지진공학회논문집, 13(6), pp.11~25 (2009), 한국지진공학회
  2. 연관희, "지진파의 가속도 푸리에스펙트럼 크기를 이용한 계측진도 평가", 한국지진공학회논문집, 13(6), pp.27~37 (2009), 한국지진공학회
  3. 연관희, "지진동모델 파라미터 동시역산을 이용한 지진관측소 분류", 물리탐사, 10(3), pp.183~190 (2007), 한국물리탐사학회
  4. Development of Key-technologies for Rapidly Disseminating Earthquake Ground-motion Effects. Final Report of Korea Meteorological Institute Project (KMIPA2016-3020) in the Earthquake and Volcano Research, "Yun KH", Korea Electric Power Cooperation Research Institute, 334~ (2018)
  5. "Earthquake Annual Reports for the years 2011/2012/2013/2014/ 2015/2016/2017"[URL]
  6. "Seminar on the analytical survey of 9.12 Earthquake", Gyeongju Hanwa Resort, Korea Meteorological Administration, 2016, pp.58~
  7. Choi MK, "Intensity Analysis of the 15 November 2017 Pohang Earthquake", Proceedings of EESK Conference (2018)
  8. "M 5.5 - 7km WSW of Heung-hai, South Korea, Did You Feel It?"[URL]
  9. "M 5.4 - 6km S of Gyeongju, South Korea, Did You Feel It?"[URL]
  10. Atkinson GM, "Bruce Worden, Vince Quitoriano. The Intensity Signature of Induced Seismicity", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(3A), pp.1080~1086 (2018)[DOI]
  11. The stable continental region data base in the Earthquakes of Stable Continental Regions: Assessment of Large Earthquake Potential, "Johnston AC", Electric Power Research Institute, ~, pp.EPRI TR-102261 (1993)
  12. Yun KH, "An Earthquake Felt Area and Magnitude Relation in Korea", Proceedings of EESK Conference (2010)
  13. Yun KH, "Criterion of Ground-Motion levels for PostEarthquake Procedures based on the Seismic Intensities of Korean Earthquakes", Proceedings of EESK Conference (2016)
  14. Yun KH, "Development of Site-Specific Ground-Motion Attenuation Relations in Korea - Examples for the Nuclear Power Plant sites", The 5th International Workshop on the Fundamental Research for Mitigating Earthquake Hazards (2005), Meteorological Research Institue
  15. David J. Wald, "ShakeMap Manual, Version 1.0", U.S. Geological Survey, ~ (2006)
  16. Park SC, "Review on instrumental intensity scale using recent Korean earthquake", Proceedings of EESK Conference (2018)
  17. Xiaobo He, "Evidence for Strong Ground Motion by Waves Refracted from the Conrad Discontinuity", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100(3), pp.1370~1374 (2010)[DOI]
  18. Rhee HM, "Crustal 1-D Q-structure in the southern Korean Peninsula", Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 44(5), pp.329~643 (2008)
  19. Chang SJ, "Crustal Structure in Southern Korea from Joint Analysis of Regional Broadband Waveforms and Travel Times", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(3), pp.856~870 (2006)[DOI]
  20. Sugan M, "Evaluating the Relevance of Moho Reflection in Accelerometric Data: Application to an Inland Japanese Earthquake", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102(2), pp.842~847 (2012)[DOI]
  21. Atkinson GM, "Relationships between Felt Intensity and Instrumental Ground Motion in the Central United States and California", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(2), pp.497~510 (2007)[DOI]
  22. Kaka SL, "Relationships between Instrumental GroundMotion Parameters and Modified Mercalli Intensity in Eastern North America", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94(5), pp.1728~1736 (2004)[DOI]
  23. Gutenberg B, "Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration: (Second paper)", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 46(2), pp.105~145 (1956)
  24. Grigoli1 F, "The November 2017 Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake: A possible case of induced seismicity in South Korea", Science (2018)[DOI]
  25. "Pohang earthquake, big concern on activation of Yangsan fault zone. needs of cutting Nuclear Power Plants - Needs plan to cut the Nuclear Power Plants in the south-eastern part of the Korean Peninsula. BreakNews", ~ (2017)
  26. 연관희, "신속 지진피해통보를 위한 지반가속도의 초당 최대값 구간적산 방법의 활용에 관한 연구 연관희", 한국지진공학회논문집, 16(1), pp.37~46 (2012), 한국지진공학회
  27. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Pre-earthquake planning and immediate nuclear power plant operator postearthquake actions (Regulatory Guide 1.166)", ~ (1997)
  28. Guideline for installation and operation of strong g round-motion seismic instrumentation, "National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA)", ~, pp.Government Legislation of NEMA No. 2010-30 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)