본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

캐비닛내부응답스펙트럼 산정을 위한 리츠방법의 정식화 및 단순예제를 통한 검증

Formulation and Verification on Ritz Method for In-Cabinet Response Spectrum

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류토목공학

초록

Safety-related cabinets and their electrical parts, such as relays and switches in nuclear power plants, should maintain continuous functioning, as well as structural safety according to the nuclear regulatory guidelines. Generally, an electrical part is qualified if its functioning is maintained without abnormality during excitement by motion compatible with the test response spectrum, which is larger than its in-cabinet response spectrum (ICRS). ICRS can be determined by shake-table test or dynamic analysis. Since existing cabinets in use can hardly be stopped and moved, dynamic analysis is preferred over shake-table test in determining ICRS. The simple method, suggested by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) to determine ICRS, yields conservative or non-conservative results from time to time. In order to determine that the ICRS is better than EPRI method in a simple way, Ritz method considering global and local plate behaviors was suggested by Gupta et al. In this paper, the Ritz method is modified in order to consider the rocking and frame behaviors simultaneously, and it is applied to a simple numerical example for verification. ICRS is determined by Ritz method and compared with the results by finite element method (FEM). Based on this numerical example, recommendations for using Ritz method are suggested.

Abstract

Safety-related cabinets and their electrical parts, such as relays and switches in nuclear power plants, should maintain continuous functioning, as well as structural safety according to the nuclear regulatory guidelines. Generally, an electrical part is qualified if its functioning is maintained without abnormality during excitement by motion compatible with the test response spectrum, which is larger than its in-cabinet response spectrum (ICRS). ICRS can be determined by shake-table test or dynamic analysis. Since existing cabinets in use can hardly be stopped and moved, dynamic analysis is preferred over shake-table test in determining ICRS. The simple method, suggested by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) to determine ICRS, yields conservative or non-conservative results from time to time. In order to determine that the ICRS is better than EPRI method in a simple way, Ritz method considering global and local plate behaviors was suggested by Gupta et al. In this paper, the Ritz method is modified in order to consider the rocking and frame behaviors simultaneously, and it is applied to a simple numerical example for verification. ICRS is determined by Ritz method and compared with the results by finite element method (FEM). Based on this numerical example, recommendations for using Ritz method are suggested.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. Recommended Practice for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations, "Korea Electric Power Industry Code (KEPIC)", KEPIC, ~, pp.KEPIC END-2000 (2000)
  2. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations", IEEE Std 344, ~ (2005)
  3. Koo KY, "Seismic response prediction for cabinets of nuclear power plants by using impact hammer test", Nuclear Engineering and Design, 240, pp.2500~2511 (2010)
  4. 조성국, "충격시험에 의한 실험모드특성을 이용한 구조물의 지진응답 예측", 한국지진공학회논문집, 14(2), pp.75~84 (2010), 한국지진공학회
  5. Guidelines for Development of In-Cabinet Seismic Demand for Devices Mounted in Electrical Cainets, "Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)", EPRI, ~, pp.EPRI NP-7146-SL (1995)
  6. Blevins RD, "Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape" (1979), Van Nostrand Reinhold Co
  7. Gup ta A, "R itz Vector Ap porach for Evaluating Incabinet Response Spectra", Nuclear Engineering and Design, 190(2), pp.255~272 (1999)
  8. Yang J, "Rocking stiffness of mounting arrangements in electrical cabinets and control panels", Nuclear Engineering and Design, 219, pp.127~141 (2002)
  9. Chopra AK., "Dynamics of Structures" (2012), Pearson

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)