Монгол тууль судлалын зарим нэг асуудалд
Controversial Issues in Research on Mongolian Epics
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to examine the results of studies on Mongolian epics and problems with the studies in an effort to suggest some of the right directions for future research and the necessity of research. Studies conducted by western researchers, especially Russian ones, have been given a heavy weight in research on Mongolian heroic epics. A lot of studies approached Mongolian heroic epics from a perspective of the poetics of history or from a standpoint of literature, such as comparing them with other genres of oral literature, investigating their relationship with documentary literature or comparing oral versions with documentary ones. In and after the late 20th century, lots of studies approached these epics from a viewpoint of anthropology or folklore, and the matter of passing heroic epics onto the next generations was highlighted. Korean researchers have already pointed out that there's something wrong with the way that the West looks at East Asian heroic epics by its own standard for western ones. In this study, the results of recent Korean studies on oral epic poetry were introduced, and it's suggested that the Korean methodology also should be applied to research on Mongolian heroic epics. That is expected to make a contribution to building a theory of oral epic poetry as well. As for another problems with the studies of Mongolian heroic epics, the necessity of the standardization of terms, the necessity of classification and the necessity of research on the comparison between Mongolian heroic epics and the oral epic poetry of surrounding countries, especially those of East Asian countries, were all suggested. Specifically, comparative research between Mongolian and East Asian heroic epics is expected to be instrumental in determining the transition of heroic epics.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the results of studies on Mongolian epics and problems with the studies in an effort to suggest some of the right directions for future research and the necessity of research. Studies conducted by western researchers, especially Russian ones, have been given a heavy weight in research on Mongolian heroic epics. A lot of studies approached Mongolian heroic epics from a perspective of the poetics of history or from a standpoint of literature, such as comparing them with other genres of oral literature, investigating their relationship with documentary literature or comparing oral versions with documentary ones. In and after the late 20th century, lots of studies approached these epics from a viewpoint of anthropology or folklore, and the matter of passing heroic epics onto the next generations was highlighted. Korean researchers have already pointed out that there's something wrong with the way that the West looks at East Asian heroic epics by its own standard for western ones. In this study, the results of recent Korean studies on oral epic poetry were introduced, and it's suggested that the Korean methodology also should be applied to research on Mongolian heroic epics. That is expected to make a contribution to building a theory of oral epic poetry as well. As for another problems with the studies of Mongolian heroic epics, the necessity of the standardization of terms, the necessity of classification and the necessity of research on the comparison between Mongolian heroic epics and the oral epic poetry of surrounding countries, especially those of East Asian countries, were all suggested. Specifically, comparative research between Mongolian and East Asian heroic epics is expected to be instrumental in determining the transition of heroic epics.
참고문헌 (18)
- В.М.Жирмунский, "Тюркский героический эпос", ~ (1960)
- Е.М.Мелетинский, "Происхождение геройческого эпоса: Ранные формы и архаические памятники" (1963), Москва
- L.Lӧrincz, "Epos in Innerasien-CAJ, Vol, XVII, №2-4", ~
- C. M. Bowra, "Heroic Poetry" (1952), Macmilan
- Felix J. Oinas, "Folklore and Folklife" (1972), University of Chicago press
- Б.Дамиранжав, "Ойрдын баатарлаг үлгэрийн онцлог шинж, Хэл бичгийн ухааны докторын диссертаци", Улаанбаатар, ~ (1997)
- С.Дулам, "Нандинбилиг, Монгол аман зохиолын онол Ⅰ", Улаанбаатар, ~ (2007)
- Р.Нарантуяа, "Түүхэн туурвил зүйн судалгааны онол түүхийн асуудалд", Төв Азийн тууль, ~ (1998)
- Б.Цогт, "Хуурын үлгэрийн судлал", Улаанбаатар, ~ (2011)
- Д. Цэрэнсодном, "Монгол аман зохиолын тайлбарт дээж бичиг", Улаанбаатар, ~ (2012)
- 박종성, "동서양 구비영웅서사시의 판도와 양상: 영웅의 출생과 성장기의 시련을 중심으로", 인문학연구, 2005 (2005), 이화여자대학교 인문학연구원
- 서대석, "구비문학의 비교연구의 과제", 碑文學硏究, 1 (1994), 한국구비문학회
- 이선아, "<단군신화>와 <게세르칸>서사시의 비교 연구와 쟁점 -한국 비교신화학 연구에 대한 전망을 중심으로", 몽골학, (34), pp.291~319 (2013), 한국몽골학회
- 이선아, "<단군신화>와 몽골 <게세르칸> 서사시의 신화적 성격 비교", 박사, 비교문학비교문화협동과정학과, pp.2012
- 이안나, "몽골 영웅서사시 ≪장가르≫에나타난 여성의 신화적 형상과 의미", 비교한국학 Comparative Korean Studies, 22(3), pp.213~242 (2014), 국제비교한국학회
- 조동일, "동아시아 구비서사시의 양상과 변천" (1997), 문학지성사
- 조동일, "한국문학과 세계문학" (1993), 지식산업사
- 최원오, "동아시아 비교서사시학" (2001), 도서출판 월인
