단순화 해석 방법에 따른 지하공동구 지진 응답 산정 비교
Comparison of Seismic Responses of Underground Utility Tunnels Using Simplified Analysis Methods
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the seismic evaluation of underground utility tunnels, selecting an analytical method is critical to estimating reasonable seismic responses. In simplified pseudo-static analysis methods widely applied to typical seismic design and evaluation of underground tunnels in practice, it is essential to check whether the methods provide valid results for cut-and-cover tunnels buried in shallow to medium depth. The differences between the two simplified pseudo-static methods are discussed in this study, and the analysis results are compared to those obtained from FLAC models. In addition to the analysis methods, seismic site classification, overburden soil depth, and sectional configuration are considered variables to examine their effects on the seismic response of underground utility tunnels. Based on the analysis results, the characteristics derived from the concepts and details of each simplified model are discussed. Also, general observations are made for the application of simplified analysis methods.
Abstract
In the seismic evaluation of underground utility tunnels, selecting an analytical method is critical to estimating reasonable seismic responses. In simplified pseudo-static analysis methods widely applied to typical seismic design and evaluation of underground tunnels in practice, it is essential to check whether the methods provide valid results for cut-and-cover tunnels buried in shallow to medium depth. The differences between the two simplified pseudo-static methods are discussed in this study, and the analysis results are compared to those obtained from FLAC models. In addition to the analysis methods, seismic site classification, overburden soil depth, and sectional configuration are considered variables to examine their effects on the seismic response of underground utility tunnels. Based on the analysis results, the characteristics derived from the concepts and details of each simplified model are discussed. Also, general observations are made for the application of simplified analysis methods.
참고문헌 (32)
- Lee MS, "A Study on the disaster safety management method of underground lifelines based on digital twin technology", Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, 39(2), pp.16~24 (2021)
- Park KD, "Development of potential scenarios of flood in underground utility tunnels", Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 55(12), pp.49~55 (2022)
- Park S, "Development of a deep learning-based fire extinguisher object detection model in underground utility tunnels", Journal of the Society of Disaster Information, 18(4), pp.922~929 (2022)
- Chung YH, "Establishment of complex disaster scenario on the utility tunnel study for digital twin system application", Journal of the Society of Disaster Information, 18(4), pp.861~872 (2022)
- Earthquake engineering of large underground structures, "Owen GN", the Federal Highway Administration, ~, pp.FHWA (1981), RD-80[DOI]
- Wang JN, "Seismic design of tunnels: A state-of-the-art approach. Monograph 7" (1993), Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas Inc
- Power M, "Seismic retrofitting manual for highway structures: Part 2-retaining structures, slopes, tunnel, curverts and roadways", MCEER, 370~ (2006)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), "Seismic design standard for utility tunnels. KDS 29 17 00", ~ (2021)
- Korea Infrastructure Safety and Technology Corporation (KISTEC), "Guidelines of seismic evaluation for existing facilities (underground utility tunnels)", ~ (2020)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), "Seismic design standard for tunnels. KDS 27 17 00", ~ (2018)
- Korea Infrastructure Safety and Technology Corporation (KISTEC), "Guidelines of seismic evaluation for existing facilities (tunnels)", ~ (2011)
- Hoeg K, "Stresses against underground structural cylinders", Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 94(SM4) (1968)
- Peck RB, "State of the art of soft-ground tunneling", Proceedings of the RETC, 1, pp.259~285 (1972)
- Merritt JL, "Seismic design of underground structures", Proceedings of the RETC, 1, pp.104~131 (1985)
- Penzien J, "Seismically induced racking of tunnel linings", Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 29, pp.683~691 (2000)
- Kawashima K, "Seismic analysis of underground structures", J of Disaster Res, 1(3), pp.378~389 (2006)
- Argyroudis S, "Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 35, pp.1~12 (2012)
- FHWA, "Technical manual for design and construction of road tunnels — civil elements.FHWANHI-10-034", U.S. Department of Transportation, ~ (2009)
- ISO (International Organization for Standardization), "ISO 23469:Bases for design of structures – Seismic actions for designing geotechnical works.International Standard ISO TC98", SC3, International Organization for Standardization, pp.2005, ~
- Pitilakis K, "Earthquake geotechnical engineering design", pp.279~340 (2014)
- Tsinidis G, "Seismic behaviour of tunnels : from experiments to analysis", Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 99, pp.103334~ (2020)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), "Seismic design standard. KDS 17 10 00", ~ (2018)
- Kim DH, "Hazard-consistent ground displacement estimation for seismic input of underground utility tunnels in Korea", J of the Korean Geotechnical Society, 37(12), pp.7~23 (2021)
- National Seismic Hazard Maps: Documentation, "Frankel AD", U.S. Geological Survey, 96~532 (1996)
- Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI), "CSI analysis reference manual for SAP2000.version 23", ETABS, SAFE and CSiBridge, ~ (2021)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), "Seismic design standard for reinforced concrete structures. KDS 14 20 80", ~ (2021)
- Itasca Consulting Group, Inc, "FLAC — Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua. version 8.1", Itasca, ~ (2019)
- Geotech report for new multi-use complex development in Moonhyeon, "Dasol Engineering Co., Ltd", 699~ (2021)
- Geotech report for new multi-use high-rise buildings in Samcheonpo, Sacheon-si, "Dong-Hae Engineering Co., Ltd", 166~ (2021)
- Geotech report for new multi-use buildings in Bonri-dong, Daegu, "Geotop Engineering", 153~ (2021)
- Geotech report for Kwangju Sunwoon A-3 Block housing development project (2nd phase) in Nonsan-si, Chuncheongnam-do, "Han-Se Geotech Engineering", 230~ (2020)
- Geotech report for Jinhae Daeya District housing redevelopment project (2nd phase) in Changwon-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, "Il-Shin Geotech", 153~ (2022)