미국 남북전쟁 시기 공화당 급진파 상원의원의 지역주의 성향
The Sectional Dimensions in the Radical Republicans: United States Senators during The Civil War
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This Article began with some discussion of what may be called the ‘Radicals Republican’ in the Civil War Senate. In the first analysis, we may never define the radical Republican Senators during the Civil War. Whatsoever we may define the radicals in the limited procedures. As used here, this article amplifies some earlier findings, suggests correction in previous works and bring a conclusion from individual voting records in Congressional Globe. The evidence described in four issues like Wade-Davis bill, 13th Amendment Constitution, Homestead Act, and Legal Tender Law in the Senate proved different conflicts. The analysis of that issues provide the basis of the following conclusions. First, 32 senators have been identified as ‘radicals,’ for the period from 1862-1865 in terms of their voting records in four bill and acts. Those votes provide one of more definitions being that ‘radicalism’ consisted on support for black people and for Reconstruction Acts. In the nature of radical republican senators reveals that they had more higher job than common men in lawyer and general or banker. But contrast to south Confederate Congress or their job did not higher than prior Congress, for Example, 29th Unite States Congress. The Wade- Davis Act prove the consistent sectional conflicts east, west and south. By contrast the 13th constitutional amendment was concurred in almost radical senators with president Abraham Lincoln. Second, ‘radical’ senators did not vote alike in the major issues, votes on such economic acts like a Homestead Act, Legal Tender Law. Instead, when these economic issues came before the Congress for decision, radical senators tended to vote with sectional line, East and West. This suggests that the definition of radicalism in the Civil War should not specify a particular stand like a faction or economic interests. This article show the sectional interesting was most important factor in the voting behaviors in the Civil War period.
Abstract
This Article began with some discussion of what may be called the ‘Radicals Republican’ in the Civil War Senate. In the first analysis, we may never define the radical Republican Senators during the Civil War. Whatsoever we may define the radicals in the limited procedures. As used here, this article amplifies some earlier findings, suggests correction in previous works and bring a conclusion from individual voting records in Congressional Globe. The evidence described in four issues like Wade-Davis bill, 13th Amendment Constitution, Homestead Act, and Legal Tender Law in the Senate proved different conflicts. The analysis of that issues provide the basis of the following conclusions. First, 32 senators have been identified as ‘radicals,’ for the period from 1862-1865 in terms of their voting records in four bill and acts. Those votes provide one of more definitions being that ‘radicalism’ consisted on support for black people and for Reconstruction Acts. In the nature of radical republican senators reveals that they had more higher job than common men in lawyer and general or banker. But contrast to south Confederate Congress or their job did not higher than prior Congress, for Example, 29th Unite States Congress. The Wade- Davis Act prove the consistent sectional conflicts east, west and south. By contrast the 13th constitutional amendment was concurred in almost radical senators with president Abraham Lincoln. Second, ‘radical’ senators did not vote alike in the major issues, votes on such economic acts like a Homestead Act, Legal Tender Law. Instead, when these economic issues came before the Congress for decision, radical senators tended to vote with sectional line, East and West. This suggests that the definition of radicalism in the Civil War should not specify a particular stand like a faction or economic interests. This article show the sectional interesting was most important factor in the voting behaviors in the Civil War period.
참고문헌 (35)
- James F. Rhodes, "History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850 to 1887" (1909), Macmillan
- "United States Congress, Congressional Globe (Washington D.C.: United States Congress Printing Office, 1867), 34th Congress, 2nd Session", ~ (1867)
- United States Congress, "Biographical Directory of the United States Congress 1774-1989" (1989), United States Government Printing Office
- James F. Rhodes, "History of the United States"
- Charles, "The Rise of American Civilization 2" (1944), Macmillan
- Howard K. Beale, "The Critical Year: A Study of Andrew Johnson and Reconstruction" (1930), Macmillan
- Irwin Unger, "Businessmen and Specie Resumption", Political Science Quarterly, 66 (1959)
- Stanley Coben, "Northeastern Business and Radical Reconstruction: A Re-examination", Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 96 (1959)
- Edward L. Gambill, "Who Were the Senate Radicals" (1965), September
- Allan G. Bogue, "The Earnest Men, Republicans of the Civil War" (1981), Cornell University Press
- David M. Potter, "Explicit Data and Implicit Assumption in Historical Study in : Generalization in the Writing of History" (1963), Chicago University Press
- "Edward L. Gambill, Who Were the Senate Radicals?", ~
- Glenn M. Linden, "Radicals’ and Economic Policies: The Senate", The Journal of Southern History, 32 (1966)
- "United States Congress. Biographical Directory of the United States Congress", ~
- "United States Congress.?Senate Journals. United States Government Printing Office, Washington D.C", ~
- United States Congress, "House of Representatives. House Journals. 27th-29th Congress, Gales and Seaton, Washington D.C", ~
- 양재열, "1840년대 미국정치와 지역주의" (2004), 서림
- Allan G. Bogue, "The Congressman’s Civil War" (1989), Cambridge University Press
- Allan G. Bogue, "The Earnest Men: Republicans of the Civil War Senate in : Of Mess and Men: The Boardinghouse and Congressional Voting, 1821- 1842", American Journal of Political Science, 19 (1975)
- "Congressional Globe, 38th, 1st Sess. (July 1, 1864)", ~ (1864)
- 한국미국사학회, "사료로 읽는 미국사" (2006), 궁리
- Horace E.Flack, "The Adoption of the 14th Amendment" (1908), Johns Hopkins University Press
- "p.98. A. Caperton Braxton, The 15th Amendment: an Account of its Enactment (Lynchburg, Virginia: J. P. Bell, 1903)", ~ (1903)
- Claude G. Bowers, "The Tragic Era, the Revolution after Lincoln" (1929), Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin
- David Donald, "The Politics of Reconstruction, 1863-1867" (1965), Louisiana State University Press
- Howard K. Beale, "The Critical Year: A Study of Andrew Johnson and Reconstruction" (1930), Frederick Unger
- Joseph B.James, "The Framing?of the 14th Amendment" (1956), University of Illinois Press
- Kenneth Stamp,The Era of Reconstruction, "1865-1877" (1965), Alfred A.Knopf
- W. R. Brock, "An American Crisis: Congress and Reconstruction" (1963), Harper and Row
- Glenn M. Linden, "Politics or Principle: Congressional Voting On the Civil War Amendments and Pro-Negro Measures" (1976), University of Washington Press
- "Congressional Globe, 37th Congress, 3rd Session", ~
- "United States Congress, Biographical Directory", ~
- 양재열, "계명사학", 16
- "United States Congress, Biographical Directory of the United States Congress", ~
- Charles Van Doren, "Webste’s American Biographies (Springfield, Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster, 1984)", ~ (1984)