로마 군대 황제의례의 성격연구
A Study on the Characters of Roman Army Emperor Cult
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
I have discussed about Signum, Sacramentum, ‘Feriale Duranum’ and camp of Roman army. The Signum of Roman army indicates an eagle and the image of Emperor. Eagle symbolized Rome, and it was regarded the most dishonorable thing that it would be taken in war. The eagle however was also the object to be worshiped by soldiers. Emperor image had both a political and a religious meaning. Politically it helped the soldiers boost their identity and cooperative spirit. Religiously emperor image was an object of worship. Soldiers offered worship to emperor image as well as gods. Roman army as most other armies demanded Sacramentum from soldiers. Politically Sacramentum put emphasis on the unity of soldiers and urges them to personal loyalty to emperor. In the point of religious view, however, Sacramentum was basically related to religious feeling. Sacramentum by the names of gods and emperor had both legal and sacred meaning. It can be seen that Roman calendar, ‘Feriale Duranum’, had both political and religious aspects. This calendar called to mind emperor’s achievements and grace on soldiers. Many festivals were celebrated for emperor and sacrifices as well were offered to him. It might be through the sacrifices to living emperor and gods that soldiers aroused their faith in emperor. Politically this calendar was a result of Augustus’s program to organize uniformly the army. His concern on Roman customs was extended to army. Augustus wished soldiers would have traditional belief. In ancient world, as cities had religious significance, the barracks of Roman army were a kind of cities with religious meaning. A centre of barrack had aedes where eagle and emperor image were enshrined. In front of this tent were celebrated religious ceremonies. This place, in which an altar was built for emperor, was sacred and symbolized emperor’s Genius. Sacrifices offered on this altar in the point of religious view were pure worship to emperor and politically gave soldiers solid unity. In ancient states, politics and religion could not be clearly separated. Similarly, Roman army emperor cult had both political and religious significance.
Abstract
I have discussed about Signum, Sacramentum, ‘Feriale Duranum’ and camp of Roman army. The Signum of Roman army indicates an eagle and the image of Emperor. Eagle symbolized Rome, and it was regarded the most dishonorable thing that it would be taken in war. The eagle however was also the object to be worshiped by soldiers. Emperor image had both a political and a religious meaning. Politically it helped the soldiers boost their identity and cooperative spirit. Religiously emperor image was an object of worship. Soldiers offered worship to emperor image as well as gods. Roman army as most other armies demanded Sacramentum from soldiers. Politically Sacramentum put emphasis on the unity of soldiers and urges them to personal loyalty to emperor. In the point of religious view, however, Sacramentum was basically related to religious feeling. Sacramentum by the names of gods and emperor had both legal and sacred meaning. It can be seen that Roman calendar, ‘Feriale Duranum’, had both political and religious aspects. This calendar called to mind emperor’s achievements and grace on soldiers. Many festivals were celebrated for emperor and sacrifices as well were offered to him. It might be through the sacrifices to living emperor and gods that soldiers aroused their faith in emperor. Politically this calendar was a result of Augustus’s program to organize uniformly the army. His concern on Roman customs was extended to army. Augustus wished soldiers would have traditional belief. In ancient world, as cities had religious significance, the barracks of Roman army were a kind of cities with religious meaning. A centre of barrack had aedes where eagle and emperor image were enshrined. In front of this tent were celebrated religious ceremonies. This place, in which an altar was built for emperor, was sacred and symbolized emperor’s Genius. Sacrifices offered on this altar in the point of religious view were pure worship to emperor and politically gave soldiers solid unity. In ancient states, politics and religion could not be clearly separated. Similarly, Roman army emperor cult had both political and religious significance.
참고문헌 (41)
- "웹스터 영한 대사전", pp.223~ (1992), 민중서각
- 曺鉉美, "로마 황제숭배의 성립에 관한 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.1998
- 이지은, "로마제정 초기의 황제숭배", 서양고대사연구, (25), pp.217~250 (2009), 한국서양고대역사문화학회
- H. F. Burton, "The Worship of the Roman Emperors", The Biblical World, 40, pp.80~91 (1912)
- L. R. Taylor, "The Divinity of the Roman Emperor", pp.35~ (1975), Scholars Press
- G. W. Bowersock, "Augustus and the Greek World", pp.112~121 (1965), Clarendon Press
- P. A. Harland, "Honours and Worship: Emperors, Imperial Cults and Associations at Ephesus (first to third centuries C.E.)", Studies in Religion, 1996, pp.25, 319~334
- L. Fox, "Pagans and Christians", pp.38~41 (1988), Harper & Row
- S. J. Friesen, "Twice Neokoros: Ephesus, Asia and the Cult of the Flavian Imperial Family", pp.147~153 (1993), Brill
- J. H. W. G. Liebeschuetz, "Continuity and Change in Roman Religion", pp.75~89 (1989), Oxford University Press
- J. R. Fears, "Ruler Worship, In Civilization of the Ancient Mediterranean: Greece and Rome 2", pp.1018~ (1988), Charles Scribner's Sons
- S. R. F. Price, "Rituals and Power, The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor", pp.9~243 (1984), Cambridge University Press
- M. Beard, "Religions of Rome 1", pp.10~ (1998), Cambridge University Press
- 최혜영, "로마 황제 숭배와 유대-크리스트교와의 갈등", 서양고대사연구, (25), pp.251~282 (2009), 한국서양고대역사문화학회
- 김활란, "네오코로스(Neokoros)에 나타난 황제의례의 정치적 의미", 지중해지역연구, 14(1), pp.1~30 (2012), 지중해지역원
- J. Helgeland, "Roman Army Religion, In Aufstieg und Niedergang der romischen Welt II. 16. 2", pp.1473~1505 (1988), Collegeville
- 프리츠 하이켈하임, "로마사", pp.580~ (2004), 현대지성사
- P. Southern, "The Roman Army - A Social and Institutional History", pp.150~160 (2007), Oxford University Press
- A. S. Hoey, "Rosaliae Signorum", HTR, pp.6~17 (1937)
- 오만규, "로마 군대종교와 초기 그리스도인들의 군복무", 한국교회사학회지, pp.14~ (1987)
- O. J. Hekster, "Fighting for Rome: The Emperor as a Military leader, In The Impact of the Roman Army", pp.92~93 (2007), Brill
- V. A. Maxfield, "The Military Decorations of the Roman Army", pp.79~83 (1981), Batsford
- B. Campbell, "The Roman Army, 31 B.C-A.D.337", pp.96~130 (1994), Routledge
- F. kemmers, "Not at random: Evidence for a regionalised coin supply?", Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, pp.39~49 (2005)
- G. Webster, "The Roman Imperial Army of the First and Second Centuries A.D", pp.189~ (1969), Funk & Wagnalls
- 배은숙, "강대국의 비밀", pp.18~91 (2008), 글항아리
- 조르주 뒤비, "세위계: 봉건제의 상상 세계", pp.556~ (1997), 문학과 지성사
- 조영식, "원수정기 로마황제와 군대", 박사, 사학, pp.2005
- L. A. Curchin, "Cult and Celt: indigenous participation in emperor worship in central Spain, In Subject and Ruler: The Cult of the Ruling Power in Classical Antiquity", pp.143~152 (1996), MI
- C. E. Brand, "Roman Military Law", pp.92~ (1968), University of Texas Press
- G. R. Watson, "The Roman Soldier", pp.44~50 (1969), Cornell
- R. O. Fink, "Roman Military Records on Papyrus", Philological Monographs of the American Philological Association, 26, pp.184~187 (1971)
- M. Grant, "The Army of the Caesars", pp.79~ (1997), Barnes Noble Books
- R. O. Fink, "The Feriale Duranum" (1940), Yale University Press
- A. Nock, "The Roman army and the Roman religious year, In Essays on Religion and the Ancient World", pp.252~270 (1986), Clarendon
- J. F. Gilliam, "The Roman Military Feriale", The Harvard Theological Review, 47, pp.184~196 (1954)
- John Elsner, "Cult and Sculpture: Sacrifice in the Ara Pacis Augustae", The Journal of Roman Studies, 81, pp.50~61 (1991)
- G. R. Watson, "The Roman Soldier", pp.128~ (1969), Thames & Hudson
- A. D. Nock, "The Roman Army and the Roman Religious Year", Harvard Theological Review, 45, pp.187~252 (1952)
- M. I. Rostovtzeff, "The Excavations at Dura-Europos: Preliminary Report of the Fifth Season of Work", pp.214~ (1934), New Haven
- A. Goldsworthy, "The Complete Roman Army", pp.108~ (2003), Thames & Hudson