A Paranarrative in the Poststructuralist Zone: Thomas Pynchon's Mason & Dixon as a Literary History
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
The history of literary theory has been a presentation of the dichotomy of "literature versus theory," and that history, I believe, should be discontinued. A text should be able to resist any type of generic classifications and allow active and spontaneous interactions between seemingly different intellectual fields. This means that a text, irrespective of its traditional label as a theoretical book or a literary text, is subject to various intellectual interpretations that produce their own generic distinctions. Paranarrative is a text that resists any type of generic classifications and allows active and spontaneous interactions between seemingly different intellectual fields. We should now start seeing the connections in such a way that a novel (Mason & Dixon, for example) suddenly becomes a literary history (of the Enlightenment) or a theoretical book (about magic realism).
참고문헌 (17)
- Adams, "Critical Theory Since 1965" (1986)
- Bleich, "Epistemological Assumptions in the Study of Response"
- Bloom,Harold, ".The Western Canon:The Books and School of the Ages" (1994), Harcourt
- Brooks,Cleanth, "The Well-Wrought Urn" (1947), Harcourt
- Jacques, "The Law of Genre Acts of Literature", pp.221~252 (1992)
- Alan Bass, "Margins of Philosophy U of Chicago P" (1982)
- Alan Bass, "U of Chicago P" (1978)
- Fish, "Is There a Text in This Class?", pp.678~693
- Frye,Northrop, "Anatomy of Criticism" (1957), Princeton UP
- Hartman,Geoffrey, "Saving the Text" (1981), Johns Hopkins UP
- Johnson,Barbara, "A World of Difference" (1987), Johns Hopkins UP
- McHale,Brian, "Postmodernist Fiction" (1994), Routledge
- Norris,Christopher, "Uncritical Theory" (1922), U of Massachusetts P
- Pynchon, Thomas, "Mason & Dixon" (1997), Henry Holt
- Rodriguez, "The Contemporary Praxis of the Fantastic" (1991)
- Spivak,Gayatri C, ".In Other Words:Essays in Cultural Politics" (1988), Routledge
- Tompkins, Jane P, "＂The Reader in History: The Changing Shape of Literary Response＂", pp.201~232