우울과 여성의 저항: 로울랜슨의 『억류와 귀환』
Melancholy and Female Resistance: Mary Rowlandson’s Narrative of Captivity and Restoration
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay tries to re-read female narratives of the 17th century Puritan society in terms of their strategy of melancholic resistance. Focusing on the way the Puritan women upheld their identity as a woman in contradistinction from the patriarchal system of religious community, I would like to elaborate how the Puritan women’s writings are much more literary than those of their male counterparts. Especially, Mary Rowlandson’s narrative subtly but effectively deconstructs the Puritan taboo of blood mixing. Offering as it does what the Puritan patriarch wants to hear from her captivity and allowing their meta-narrative intervention, Rowlandson performs the role of a gentle woman, which revolves around the doubt about her chastity. Deliberately debasing herself below the human being and effacing her femininity, she succeeds dismantling the Purtian reader’s expectation of her womanhood. Far too excessive descriptions of her disgraceful sufferings as a survivor, who pushes herself into the extreme of instinctive animality, strangely disarm the ideological structure of the Puritan idea of modest femininity and sacrificial motherhood. In this sense, her narrative is not only the record of her realistic experience per se but also a counter-narrative against the 17th century American Puritan society. Rowlandson’s self-presentation as a melancholic, who displaces her denouncing gesture into a disguised self-debasement, aptly resists the time old contradiction in the Purtain patriarchy. Neither a scapegoat of motherhood nor a hero of the Puritan femininity, Rowlandson’s narrator simply justifies her survival as a woman.
Abstract
This essay tries to re-read female narratives of the 17th century Puritan society in terms of their strategy of melancholic resistance. Focusing on the way the Puritan women upheld their identity as a woman in contradistinction from the patriarchal system of religious community, I would like to elaborate how the Puritan women’s writings are much more literary than those of their male counterparts. Especially, Mary Rowlandson’s narrative subtly but effectively deconstructs the Puritan taboo of blood mixing. Offering as it does what the Puritan patriarch wants to hear from her captivity and allowing their meta-narrative intervention, Rowlandson performs the role of a gentle woman, which revolves around the doubt about her chastity. Deliberately debasing herself below the human being and effacing her femininity, she succeeds dismantling the Purtian reader’s expectation of her womanhood. Far too excessive descriptions of her disgraceful sufferings as a survivor, who pushes herself into the extreme of instinctive animality, strangely disarm the ideological structure of the Puritan idea of modest femininity and sacrificial motherhood. In this sense, her narrative is not only the record of her realistic experience per se but also a counter-narrative against the 17th century American Puritan society. Rowlandson’s self-presentation as a melancholic, who displaces her denouncing gesture into a disguised self-debasement, aptly resists the time old contradiction in the Purtain patriarchy. Neither a scapegoat of motherhood nor a hero of the Puritan femininity, Rowlandson’s narrator simply justifies her survival as a woman.
참고문헌 (14)
- 강우성, "내파(內破)의 시학: 미국 청교도의 예형론과 알레고리", 인문논총, (53), pp.149~171 (2005), 인문학연구원
- Bradstreet, Anne, "The Works of Anne Bradstreet" (1967), Harvard UP
- Breitwieser, Mitchell Robert, "American Puritanism and the Defense of Mourning" (1990), U of Wisconsin P
- Castiglia, Christopher, "Bound and Determined: Captivity, Culture-Crossing, and White Womanhood from Mary Rowlandson to Patty Hearst" (1996), U of Chicago P
- Daly, Robert, "Puritan Poetics: The World, The Flesh, and God", Early American Literature, 12, pp.136~162 (1977)
- Drake, James D., "King Philip’s War: Civil War in New England 1675-1676" (1999), U of Massachusettes P
- Elliott, Emory, "Power and the Pulpit in Puritan New England" (1975), Princeton UP
- Freud, Sigmund, "The Freud Reader", pp.584~588 (1989), Norton
- Lepore, Jill, "The Name of War: King Philip’s War and the Origins of American Identity" (1998), Vintage
- Mather, Cotton, "The Present State of New England" (1972), Haskell House
- Rowlandson, Mary White, "The Sovereignty and Goodness of God" (1997), Bedford
- Salisbury, Neal, "The Sovereignty and Goodness of God" (1997), Bedford
- Sayer, Gordon M., "American Captivity Narratives" (2000), Houghton Mifflin
- Toulouse, Teresa A., "‘Our Own Credit’: Strategies of (E)Valuation in Mary Rowlandson’s Captivity Narrative", American Literature, 64, pp.655~676 (1992)
