본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

혁명문학논쟁과 루쉰의 혁명문학관

Controversy of Revolutionary Literature and Lu, xun’s View of Revolutionary Literature

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Lu, Xun had been seeking after reform of life and its subject, and the Controversy of Revolutionary Literature led Lu, xun to find new subject, so it had significant meaning for Lu, xun. In Lu, Xun’s view, intellectual writer couldn’t break bounds of practice and life which belonged to Companion writer, being mentioned several times by Lu, Xun. Unlike revolutionary literature groups, Lu, Xun took a stand that subalterns write their own literature and have to become literary subject. But because they as masses was ambivalent existence, Lu, Xun argued that the intellectual as companion should find out how they subalterns could be subject. He also anticipated that the intellectual writers constantly research the realities of life, analyze and capture the certain moment of life. Moreover, in the process of debate against revolutionary literature groups, Lu, Xun’s critiques that they speak revolution for the purpose of literature reveal that he had immature understand on class and class consciousness. On the other hand, Lu, Xun came to deeply understand socialist literary theory or proletarian literary theory throughout debates, and afterwards often used concept of proletariat in the expressions of revoluntionary literature.

Abstract

Lu, Xun had been seeking after reform of life and its subject, and the Controversy of Revolutionary Literature led Lu, xun to find new subject, so it had significant meaning for Lu, xun. In Lu, Xun’s view, intellectual writer couldn’t break bounds of practice and life which belonged to Companion writer, being mentioned several times by Lu, Xun. Unlike revolutionary literature groups, Lu, Xun took a stand that subalterns write their own literature and have to become literary subject. But because they as masses was ambivalent existence, Lu, Xun argued that the intellectual as companion should find out how they subalterns could be subject. He also anticipated that the intellectual writers constantly research the realities of life, analyze and capture the certain moment of life. Moreover, in the process of debate against revolutionary literature groups, Lu, Xun’s critiques that they speak revolution for the purpose of literature reveal that he had immature understand on class and class consciousness. On the other hand, Lu, Xun came to deeply understand socialist literary theory or proletarian literary theory throughout debates, and afterwards often used concept of proletariat in the expressions of revoluntionary literature.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 김택현, "서발턴과 역사학 비판" (2003), 박종철출판사
  2. 이진경, "맑스주의와 근대성" (2014), 그린비
  3. 전형준, "루쉰" (1997), 문학과 지성사
  4. 전형준, "현대 중국의 리얼리즘 이론" (1997), 창작과 비평사
  5. 艾曉明, "中國左翼文學思潮探源" (1991), 湖南文藝出版社
  6. 魯迅, "魯迅全集3" (1996), 人民文學出版社
  7. 王宏志, "魯迅與‘左聯’" (2006), 新星出版社
  8. 王曉明, "批評空間的開創" (1998), 東方出版中心
  9. 下, "“革命文學”論爭資料選編 上", pp.1981, 中國社會科學院文學硏究所現代文學硏究室
  10. 루쉰, "魯迅5-6" (1997), 그린비
  11. 심혜영, "문학과 정치" (1989), 중앙일보사
  12. 에티엔 발리바르, "대중들의 공포" (2007), 도서출판 b
  13. 서광덕, "동아시아의 근대성과 노신: 일본의 노신 연구를 중심으로", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2003
  14. 錢理群, "構建無産階級文學的兩種想像與實踐", 蘭州大學學報, (6) (2005)
  15. 張勇, "魯迅‘革命文學論’的形成及其獨特性", 文學理論與批評, (1) (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)