중국의 ≪四十二章经≫에 나타난 불교 호칭어 분석 — 붓다와 불교 신도 호칭어를 중심으로
An Analysis of Buddhism Reference Terms that Appear in China’s The Sutra of Forty Two Chapters ― Focusing on Words of the Buddha and Buddhists
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper analyzes examples of Buddhism reference terms that appear in China’s The Sutra of Forty-Two Chapters and reveals several facts. There are several points of contention concerning the book and its authenticity, but in Chinese academic circles it is regularly viewed as the first Indian Buddhist scriptures to be translated into Chinese. The Buddhism reference terms that appear in it include “Fo(佛),” “Shizun(世尊),” “Shamen(沙门),” “Biqiu (比丘),” “Xutuohuan(须陀洹),” “Situohan(斯陀含),” “Anahan(阿那含),” “Aluohan(阿罗汉),” “Pizhifo (辟支佛),” and “Jiashefo(迦叶佛).” Among several terms that have been translated from Sanskrit into Chinese, these are significant because they are the first Buddhism reference terms to appear in China’s Buddhist scriptures. The pragmatic characteristics of the words of Buddha and Buddhists in China’s The Sutra of Forty-Two Chapters are mostly employed as terms of reference. Especially “Shizun(世尊)” is primarily used as a term to address in the Diamon Sutra, whereas it is used as a term of reference in The Sutra of Forty-Two Chapters, demonstrating differences of usage based on Buddhist scripture. Furthermore, the structure of Buddhism Reference Terms in China’s The Sutra of Forty-Two Chapters has comparatively more use of simple than compound words. Moreover, the simple term “Fo(佛)” refers to Buddha, while the compound terms “Pizhifo (辟支佛),” and “Jiashefo(迦叶佛),” incorporating “‘Fo(佛),” refer to Buddhist saints. “Fo (佛)” thus demonstrates a tendency for objects referred to in The Sutra of Forty-Two Chapters to appear differently according to the composition of the word.
Abstract
This paper analyzes examples of Buddhism reference terms that appear in China’s The Sutra of Forty-Two Chapters and reveals several facts. There are several points of contention concerning the book and its authenticity, but in Chinese academic circles it is regularly viewed as the first Indian Buddhist scriptures to be translated into Chinese. The Buddhism reference terms that appear in it include “Fo(佛),” “Shizun(世尊),” “Shamen(沙门),” “Biqiu (比丘),” “Xutuohuan(须陀洹),” “Situohan(斯陀含),” “Anahan(阿那含),” “Aluohan(阿罗汉),” “Pizhifo (辟支佛),” and “Jiashefo(迦叶佛).” Among several terms that have been translated from Sanskrit into Chinese, these are significant because they are the first Buddhism reference terms to appear in China’s Buddhist scriptures. The pragmatic characteristics of the words of Buddha and Buddhists in China’s The Sutra of Forty-Two Chapters are mostly employed as terms of reference. Especially “Shizun(世尊)” is primarily used as a term to address in the Diamon Sutra, whereas it is used as a term of reference in The Sutra of Forty-Two Chapters, demonstrating differences of usage based on Buddhist scripture. Furthermore, the structure of Buddhism Reference Terms in China’s The Sutra of Forty-Two Chapters has comparatively more use of simple than compound words. Moreover, the simple term “Fo(佛)” refers to Buddha, while the compound terms “Pizhifo (辟支佛),” and “Jiashefo(迦叶佛),” incorporating “‘Fo(佛),” refer to Buddhist saints. “Fo (佛)” thus demonstrates a tendency for objects referred to in The Sutra of Forty-Two Chapters to appear differently according to the composition of the word.
참고문헌 (30)
- 경전연구모임, "법구경, 사십이장경" (1996), 불교시대사
- 계환, "중국불교" (2014), 민족사
- 곽철환, "시공 불교사전" (2003), 시공사
- 김두찬, "佛說四十二章經의 口訣에 대하여", 국어학, 18 (1989)
- 동국역경원 역경위원회, "한글대장경 十力經 外" (1995), 동국역경원
- 성법, "불설사십이장경" (2005), 정우서적
- 송영준, "사십이장경" (2011), 부다가야
- 이명아, "『金刚经』에 나타난 중국어 붓다(Buddha) 호칭어의 화용론적 특징", 중국언어연구, (72), pp.35~58 (2017), 한국중국언어학회
- 이상백, "「佛祖三經」의 성립과 저본에 관한 고찰", 서지학연구, (53), pp.155~178 (2012), 한국서지학회
- 전수태, "漢譯對照梵韓大辭典" (2007), 대한교육문화신문출판
- 정순일, "佛祖要經本 四十二章經의 硏究", 원불교사상과 종교문화, 8 (1984)
- 최태옥, "『금강경』 번역의 한중일 비교연구 - 붓다의 호칭을 중심으로 -", 日本語敎育, (76), pp.61~76 (2016), 한국일본어교육학회
- 학담, "사십이장경강의" (2009), 큰수레
- 한용수, "중국어 남녀 호칭어 비대칭에 대한 소고", 인문과학연구, (38), pp.211~229 (2013), 인문과학연구소
- 陈琛, "和尙 : 出家人的日常生活" (2006), 中国广播电视
- 陈聿东, "佛教文化百科" (2005), 天津人民出版社
- 储泰松, "“和尚”的语源及其形义的演变", 语言研究, 1 (2002)
- 傅惠生, "论≪四十二章经≫译文的历史经典性", 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 6 (2014)
- 李沁, "≪四十二章经≫版本再研究", 硕士, pp.2015
- 马大勇, "红妆翠眉 : 中国女子的古典化妆, 美容" (2012), 重庆大学出版社
- 阮光颖, "四十二章经的探究", 硕士, pp.2008
- 尙荣, "四十二章经" (2016), 中华书局
- 徐琳, "≪祖堂集≫佛教称谓词语研究" (2010), 四川大学出版社
- 徐玉成, "中国导游十万个为什么-佛教" (2006), 中国旅游出版社
- 许卫东, "高僧传中僧人佛徒称谓探", 中州学刊, 4 (2011)
- 杨秀英, "敦煌愿文社会交际称谓词研究", 广西社会科学, 6 (2002)
- 元文广, "从语言学角度考证"四十二章经"的成书年代", 图书馆学研究, 10 (2016)
- 张培锋, "佛家礼仪" (2004), 天津人民出版社
- 张绥, "四十二章经序和牟子理惑论辨伪", 社会科学, 4 (1983)
- 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室, "现代汉语词典" (2016), 商务印书馆
