본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

梁建植과 ≪西廂記≫ 小考

Review on Yang, Geonsik and Xixiangji

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Yang Geonsik was a matchless existence in translating and introducing Chinese literature into Korea in the early 20th century. He tried modern translation of Xixiangji as a representative classical play of China in the 1920s. Yang who had always pursued innovation throughout his literary life tested the translation of Xixiangji as an original script by applying modern styles of writing and senses to it resolutely out of customs of traditional texts and translation from selecting Xixiangji which Guo, Moruo modernly dramatized. Also, he introduced a critical essay of Guo, Moruo who freshly stated Xixiangji from a modern viewpoint. His translation experiment was not always smooth and ended incompletely in small width. Nonetheless, in that it prepared an opportunity to see Chineses classical literature newly in a modern view through Xixiangji, it achieved small but meaningful result. Plus, although his experiment kept a big flow of accepting Xixiangji into Korea which has been continued constantly since the late Joseon Dynasty, the first modern translation and review were shown in a drastic trial differentiated from existing tradition. In that point, it added a special page to the adoption history of Xixiangji. Of course, because his translation exposed problems and limits together, evaluation on his performance needs suitable balance.

Abstract

Yang Geonsik was a matchless existence in translating and introducing Chinese literature into Korea in the early 20th century. He tried modern translation of Xixiangji as a representative classical play of China in the 1920s. Yang who had always pursued innovation throughout his literary life tested the translation of Xixiangji as an original script by applying modern styles of writing and senses to it resolutely out of customs of traditional texts and translation from selecting Xixiangji which Guo, Moruo modernly dramatized. Also, he introduced a critical essay of Guo, Moruo who freshly stated Xixiangji from a modern viewpoint. His translation experiment was not always smooth and ended incompletely in small width. Nonetheless, in that it prepared an opportunity to see Chineses classical literature newly in a modern view through Xixiangji, it achieved small but meaningful result. Plus, although his experiment kept a big flow of accepting Xixiangji into Korea which has been continued constantly since the late Joseon Dynasty, the first modern translation and review were shown in a drastic trial differentiated from existing tradition. In that point, it added a special page to the adoption history of Xixiangji. Of course, because his translation exposed problems and limits together, evaluation on his performance needs suitable balance.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. "貫華堂第六才子書西廂記", ~
  2. 郭沫若, "西廂" (1921), 泰東圖書局
  3. 양회석, "서상기" (1996), 진원
  4. 김영금, "백화 양건식 문학 연구" (2005), 한국학술정보
  5. 남윤수, "梁白華文集" (1995), 강원대학교출판부
  6. 이석호, "중국문학 轉信者로서의 梁白華", 연세논총, 13 (1976)
  7. 박재연, "梁白華의중국문학번역작품에대한재평가", 중국학연구, 4 (1988)
  8. 고재석, "백화 양건식 문학연구 I", 한국문학연구, 12 (1989)
  9. 최용철, "白華梁建植의中國文學硏究와飜譯에대하여", 중국어문학, 28 (1996)
  10. 김영금, "梁建植의 중국문학 번역과 소개에 대한 연구", 한중언어문화연구, 5 (2003)
  11. 하경심, "국내 中國古典戱曲의 번역 현황 및 실제", 중국어문학논집, (28), pp.511~537 (2004), 중국어문학연구회
  12. 이주미, "백화 양건식의 현대적 문예관", 한국문학이론과 비평, 12(3), pp.411~432 (2008), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  13. 박남용, "일제시기 중국 현대희곡의 국내 번역과 그 특징 연구", 중국학연구, (50), pp.429~459 (2009), 중국학연구회
  14. 이지은, "梁白華의 ≪長生殿≫ 飜譯 初探", 중국어문논총, (46), pp.473~493 (2010), 중국어문연구회
  15. 정선경, "근대시기 양건식의 중국고전소설 번역 및 수용에 관하여", 중국어문학논집, (73), pp.351~377 (2012), 중국어문학연구회
  16. 彭林祥, "论郭沫若对≪西廂記≫的改编和现代阐释", 中国现代文学研究丛刊, (3) (2011)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)