≪紅樓夢≫의 還魂 미메시스 활용 양상에 대한 연구
The Aspect of Mimesis about the Soul Return from the Death in Hongloumeng(紅樓夢)
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this article is to extract the expression patterns and key characteristics of the aspect of mimesis containing separation of the soul from the body and revival from death in Hongloumeng(紅樓夢) and to analyze their background and meaning. The motif of the dead man’s soul returning to the body served as a key device for plot composition is Tang Xianzhu(湯顯祖)’s play Mudanting(牡丹亭). In Mudanting(牡丹亭), the separation of the soul from the body is set as a preliminary step toward revival. But in Cao Xueqin(曹雪芹)’s Hongloumeng(紅樓夢), the separated soul does not achieve the revival of the body. The soul can only remain in the dream space, and cannot move on to the other personality space. Through this, expectations of readers for the reproduction of Mudanting(牡丹亭) are rejected, and it is required to accept the new attributes of the affection that Hongloumeng(紅樓夢) aims for. And it also influenced the determination of the acceptance tendency of Hongloumeng(紅樓夢). After the publication of Hongloumeng(紅樓夢), the tendency to accept is divided into choosing the motif of Mudanting(牡丹亭) and the motif of Hongroumeng(紅樓夢), which greatly influences the creative tendency of adaptations based on the work.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to extract the expression patterns and key characteristics of the aspect of mimesis containing separation of the soul from the body and revival from death in Hongloumeng(紅樓夢) and to analyze their background and meaning. The motif of the dead man’s soul returning to the body served as a key device for plot composition is Tang Xianzhu(湯顯祖)’s play Mudanting(牡丹亭). In Mudanting(牡丹亭), the separation of the soul from the body is set as a preliminary step toward revival. But in Cao Xueqin(曹雪芹)’s Hongloumeng(紅樓夢), the separated soul does not achieve the revival of the body. The soul can only remain in the dream space, and cannot move on to the other personality space. Through this, expectations of readers for the reproduction of Mudanting(牡丹亭) are rejected, and it is required to accept the new attributes of the affection that Hongloumeng(紅樓夢) aims for. And it also influenced the determination of the acceptance tendency of Hongloumeng(紅樓夢). After the publication of Hongloumeng(紅樓夢), the tendency to accept is divided into choosing the motif of Mudanting(牡丹亭) and the motif of Hongroumeng(紅樓夢), which greatly influences the creative tendency of adaptations based on the work.
참고문헌 (18)
- 湯顯祖, "牡丹亭" (2005), 人民文學出版社
- 曹雪芹, "紅樓夢" (2010), 人民文學出版社
- 조설근, "홍루몽" (2009), 나남
- 탕현조, "모란정" (2014), 소명출판
- 劉夢溪, "紅樓夢與牡丹亭" (2010), 文化藝術出版社
- 王鄭, "中國古典戲曲母題史" (2015), 中國社會科學出版社
- 徐扶明, "牡丹亭硏究資料考釋" (2016), 上海古籍出版社
- 肖大平, "동아시아 지괴류 한문소설의 비교연구", 박사, pp.2019
- WANG FEIYAN, "湯顯祖之 ≪牡丹亭≫對六朝志怪小說素材的吸收與發展", 중국문학, 90, pp.117~132 (2017), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 유병갑, "陳玄祐 <離魂記> 硏究", 중국문학연구, (70), pp.25~47 (2018), 한국중문학회[DOI]
- 홍상훈, "《홍루몽》에 나타난 꿈의 성격", 중국문학, 72, pp.155~171 (2012), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 陳才訓, "≪西廂記≫、≪牡丹亭≫: 宝、黛、釵; 形象塑造的參照本", 紅樓夢學幹, 14(3)
- 劉松來, "≪牡丹亭≫ ≪紅樓夢≫“至情”主題之異同", 江西師範大學學報, 45(1) (2012)
- 劉壹儀, "湯顯祖≪牡丹亭≫與此前的離魂故事", 吉林省敎育學院學報, 32(2) (2016)
- 楊柳靑, "“離魂”故事的發展與≪牡丹亭≫創作的成熟", 許昌學院學報, 35(1) (2016)
- 鄒自振, "湯顯祖與≪紅樓夢≫", 福州大學學報, 14(3) (2000)
- 張麗紅, "≪牡丹亭≫对≪红楼梦≫的影响", 喜劇文學, (11) (2019)
- 甄洪永, "妙合與越从-≪牡丹亭≫到≪红楼梦≫", 红楼梦学刊 (2014)