본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Tragic Cognition and Philosophical Thinking

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Greek philosophy was created from strained relations with traditional thought. In ancient Greece, there were both rising intellects who stood by philosophical thinking and defenders of traditional thought who were prejudiced against the newly developed innovative thinking. Accordingly, Greek philosophy cannot be considered to represent Greek thinking or civilization. Greek tragedy, which sublimates strained relations between philosophy that represents rising thinking and traditional thoughts into art, would rather be the one that represents what's Greek. When we closely examine closely Oedipus the King of Sophocles, we read a stern warning that was formed in the tense relations between the new and the traditional thinking. As the new thinking that searches for universal knowledge grounded on the sense of identity(hybris) cannot be the tool with which one could inquire into the human fate or providence(moira), it warns strictly that we would eventually end up collapsing when we use philosophical thinking in searching for the truth. We can read the following messages from such a warning on the philosophy. First, Greek philosophers after the era of tragedy, such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, established their philosophies based on the stern warnings and criticisms of Greek tragedy. Second, one would hardly be able to surpass western philosophical thinking without a critical consciousness as strict as the tragic poets held.

Abstract

Greek philosophy was created from strained relations with traditional thought. In ancient Greece, there were both rising intellects who stood by philosophical thinking and defenders of traditional thought who were prejudiced against the newly developed innovative thinking. Accordingly, Greek philosophy cannot be considered to represent Greek thinking or civilization. Greek tragedy, which sublimates strained relations between philosophy that represents rising thinking and traditional thoughts into art, would rather be the one that represents what's Greek. When we closely examine closely Oedipus the King of Sophocles, we read a stern warning that was formed in the tense relations between the new and the traditional thinking. As the new thinking that searches for universal knowledge grounded on the sense of identity(hybris) cannot be the tool with which one could inquire into the human fate or providence(moira), it warns strictly that we would eventually end up collapsing when we use philosophical thinking in searching for the truth. We can read the following messages from such a warning on the philosophy. First, Greek philosophers after the era of tragedy, such as Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, established their philosophies based on the stern warnings and criticisms of Greek tragedy. Second, one would hardly be able to surpass western philosophical thinking without a critical consciousness as strict as the tragic poets held.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 소포클레스, "오이디푸스 왕" (1968), 현암사
  2. 천병희, "그리스 비극의 이해" (2002), 문예출판사
  3. 소포클레스, "비극의 이해", 서양고전학연구, 8 (1994)
  4. Sophocles, "Oedipus the King" (1968), Harvard Uni. Press
  5. Clifford Leech, "悲" (1970), 서울대학교 출판부
  6. Corrigan Robert W, "Tragedy Vision and Form" (1981), Harper & Row
  7. Goux Jean-Joseph, "Oedipus, Philosopher" (1993), stanford University Press
  8. Hogan James C, "A Commentary on the Plays of Sophocles, Carbondale and Edwardsville", pp.28~ (1991), Southern Illinois University Press
  9. Laurence Michel, "Tragedy Modern Essays in Criticism" (1963), Prentice-Hall
  10. Martin P. Nilsson, "A History of Greek Religion" (1964), Norton & Company
  11. Richard Jebb, "The Oedipus Tyrannus of Sophocles" (1887), Cambridge University Press
  12. Richard Buxton, "Oxford Readings in Greek Religion Oxford" (2000), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)