본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Clinical Efficacy of Primary Tumor Volume Measurements: Comparison of Different Primary Sites

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives. The purpose of study was to determine the clinical efficacy of primary tumor volume measurements of different primary sites in the oropharynx compared to the oral cavity. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 85 patients with oral cavity or oropharynx cancer. The tumor area was manually outlined from axial magnetic resonance (MR) series. The software calculated the tumor volumes, automatically. The values of the primary tumor volumes were then subdivided into separate groups (≤3,500 ㎣, >3,500 ㎣). Results. The prognostic indicators were the cT and cN (oral cavity); age, primary site, cT, cN, and primary tumor volume (oropharynx) on the univariate analysis. There was no significant prognostic factor for oral cavity cancer on the multivariate analysis. Primary site, cN, and primary tumor volume were independent prognostic indicators for oropharynx cancer by multivariate analysis. Conclusion. Primary tumor volume measurement is a reliable way to stratify outcome, and make up for the weak points in the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system with oropharynx cancer.

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of study was to determine the clinical efficacy of primary tumor volume measurements of different primary sites in the oropharynx compared to the oral cavity. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 85 patients with oral cavity or oropharynx cancer. The tumor area was manually outlined from axial magnetic resonance (MR) series. The software calculated the tumor volumes, automatically. The values of the primary tumor volumes were then subdivided into separate groups (≤3,500 ㎣, >3,500 ㎣). Results. The prognostic indicators were the cT and cN (oral cavity); age, primary site, cT, cN, and primary tumor volume (oropharynx) on the univariate analysis. There was no significant prognostic factor for oral cavity cancer on the multivariate analysis. Primary site, cN, and primary tumor volume were independent prognostic indicators for oropharynx cancer by multivariate analysis. Conclusion. Primary tumor volume measurement is a reliable way to stratify outcome, and make up for the weak points in the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system with oropharynx cancer.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. Kimura Y, "Volumetric MR imaging of oral, maxillary sinus, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancers: correlation between tumor volume and lymph node metastasis", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 26(9), pp.2384~2389 (2005)
  2. Le Tourneau C, "Prognostic indicators for survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas:analysis of a series of 621 cases", Head Neck, 27(9), pp.801~808 (2005)
  3. Mancuso AA, "Preradiotherapy computed tomography as a predictor of local control in supraglottic carcinoma", J Clin Oncol, 17(2), pp.631~637 (1999)
  4. Lo SM, "Tumour volume: implications in T2", T3 glottic, J Otolaryngol, pp.1998, 27(5)[DOI]
  5. Chao KS, "Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma:impact of tumor volume", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 59(1), pp.43~50 (2004)
  6. Doweck I, "Tumor volume predicts outcome for advanced head and neck cancer treated with targeted chemoradiotherapy", Laryngoscope, 112(10), pp.1742~1749 (2002)
  7. Johnson CR, "The tumor volume and clonogen number relationship: tumor control predictions based upon tumor volume estimates derived from computed tomogra-phy", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 33(2), pp.281~287 (1995)
  8. Johnson CR, "The influence of quantitative tumor volume measurements on local control in advanced head and neck cancer using concomitant boost accelerated superfractionated irradiation", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 32(3), pp.635~641 (1995)
  9. Chang CC, "The effect of primary tumor volumes in advanced T-staged nasopharyngeal tumors", Head Neck, 24(10), pp.940~946 (2002)
  10. Weiss E, "The impact of gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) definition on the total accuracy in radiotherapy theoretical aspects and practical experiences", Strahlenther Onkol, 179(1), pp.21~30 (2003)
  11. Gordon AR, "Intraobserver variability in the MR determination of tumor volume in squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 25(6), pp.1092~1098 (2004)
  12. Lenz M, "Oropharynx, oral cavity, floor of the mouth: CT and MRI", Eur J Radiol, 33(3), pp.203~215 (2000)
  13. Daisne JF, "Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma:comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen", Radiology, 233(1), pp.93~100 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

Relationships between Tumor Volume and Lymphatic Metastasis and Prognosis in Early Oral Tongue Cancer김민식, 박준욱, 선동일, 조광재, 주영훈, 황세환대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2013 · 제6권 제4호Tumor Regression Patterns Based on Follow-up Duration in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy공문규, 홍성언대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2015 · 제8권 제4호Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis by Tumor Dimension Versus Tumor Biological Properties in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas고영혜, 김민지, 류광희, 장전엽, 정한신, 최나연대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2016 · 제48권 제1호Clinical analysis of neck node metastasis in oral cavity cancer김진욱, Aditi Sharma, Jun-Young Paeng대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2018 · 제44권 제6호Tumor Volume Reduction Rate during Adaptive Radiation Therapy as a Prognosticator for Nasopharyngeal Cancer남희림, 노재명, 박수연, 안용찬, 오동률, 이혜빈대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2016 · 제48권 제2호Predictors of Distant Metastasis after Radical Surgery Followed by Postoperative Radiotherapy with or without Chemotherapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer강진형, 김연실, 김지윤, 유이령, 이연수, 이윤희, 장지현, 정미주대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2016 · 제48권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)