본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Can Wideband Tympanometry Be Used as a Screening Test for Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence?

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives. We explored whether wideband tympanometry (WBT) could be used as a screening test for superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD), and obtained new WBT data (given that the test is not yet in common clinical use) on patients with SSCD. Methods. We compared the WBT data of patients clinically and radiologically diagnosed with SSCD in our hospital between 2013 and 2018 to those of healthy volunteers. We compared the resonance frequency (RF), maximum absorbance frequency (MAF), and maximum absorbance ratio (MAR). The t-test was used for statistical analysis with the significance level set to P<0.05. In addition, we used receiver operating characteristic analysis to derive cutoff values for SSCD diagnosis in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Results. Seventeen patients (four with bilateral and 13 with unilateral disease; 17 ears) diagnosed with SSCD and 27 healthy volunteers (47 ears) were included. The mean RFs of the SSCD patients and healthy subjects were 548.7 Hz (range, 243 to 853 Hz) and 935.1 Hz (range, 239 to 1,875 Hz), respectively (P<0.001). The mean MARs of the SSCD patients and healthy subjects were 89.4% (range, 62% to 100%) and 82.4% (range, 63% to 99%), respectively (P=0.005). The mean MAFs of the SSCD patients and healthy subjects were 1,706.3 Hz (range, 613 to 3,816 Hz) and 2,668 Hz (range, 876 to 4,387 Hz), respectively (P<0.001). In terms of SSCD diagnosis, a MAR above 86% afforded 81% sensitivity and 77% specificity; an RF below 728 Hz, 86% sensitivity and 81% specificity; and an MAF below 1,835 Hz, 79% sensitivity and 67% specificity. Conclusion. WBT may be a useful clinical screening test for SSCD. The RF and MAF were lower, and the MAR higher, in SSCD patients than in normal controls.

Abstract

Objectives. We explored whether wideband tympanometry (WBT) could be used as a screening test for superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD), and obtained new WBT data (given that the test is not yet in common clinical use) on patients with SSCD. Methods. We compared the WBT data of patients clinically and radiologically diagnosed with SSCD in our hospital between 2013 and 2018 to those of healthy volunteers. We compared the resonance frequency (RF), maximum absorbance frequency (MAF), and maximum absorbance ratio (MAR). The t-test was used for statistical analysis with the significance level set to P<0.05. In addition, we used receiver operating characteristic analysis to derive cutoff values for SSCD diagnosis in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Results. Seventeen patients (four with bilateral and 13 with unilateral disease; 17 ears) diagnosed with SSCD and 27 healthy volunteers (47 ears) were included. The mean RFs of the SSCD patients and healthy subjects were 548.7 Hz (range, 243 to 853 Hz) and 935.1 Hz (range, 239 to 1,875 Hz), respectively (P<0.001). The mean MARs of the SSCD patients and healthy subjects were 89.4% (range, 62% to 100%) and 82.4% (range, 63% to 99%), respectively (P=0.005). The mean MAFs of the SSCD patients and healthy subjects were 1,706.3 Hz (range, 613 to 3,816 Hz) and 2,668 Hz (range, 876 to 4,387 Hz), respectively (P<0.001). In terms of SSCD diagnosis, a MAR above 86% afforded 81% sensitivity and 77% specificity; an RF below 728 Hz, 86% sensitivity and 81% specificity; and an MAF below 1,835 Hz, 79% sensitivity and 67% specificity. Conclusion. WBT may be a useful clinical screening test for SSCD. The RF and MAF were lower, and the MAR higher, in SSCD patients than in normal controls.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Minor LB, "Sound-and", or pressureinduced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal, 1998, pp.124(3), 249~258
  2. Mau C, "Superior semicircular canal dehiscence : diagnosis and management", J Clin Neurosci, 48, pp.58~65 (2018)
  3. Minor LB, "Clinical manifestations of superior semicircular canal dehiscence", Laryngoscope, 115(10), pp.1717~1727 (2005)
  4. Zhou G, "Clinical and diagnostic characterization of canal dehiscence syndrome : a great otologic mimicker", Otol Neurotol, 28(7), pp.920~926 (2007)
  5. Rauch SD, "Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials", Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 14(5), pp.299~304 (2006)
  6. Rosowski JJ, "Ear-canal reflectance, umbo velocity, and tympanometry in normal-hearing adults", Ear Hear, 33(1), pp.19~34 (2012)
  7. Feeney MP, "Wideband energy reflectance measurements in adults with middle-ear disorders", J Speech Lang Hear Res, 46(4), pp.901~911 (2003)
  8. Margolis RH, "Multifrequency tympanometry in normal ears", Audiology, 24(1), pp.44~53 (1985)
  9. Shahnaz N, "Standard and multifrequency tympanometric norms for Caucasian and Chinese young adults", Ear Hear, 27(1), pp.75~90 (2006)
  10. Ozgur A, "Wideband tympanometry normative data for different age groups in Turkish population", J Int Adv Otol, 12(1), pp.82~86 (2016)
  11. Roditi RE, "Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials(cVEMPs)in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome(SCDS)", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 141(1), pp.24~28 (2009)
  12. Jerger J, "Clinical experience with impedance audiometry", Arch Otolaryngol, 92(4), pp.311~324 (1970)
  13. Merchant GR, "Power reflectance as a screening tool for the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence", Otol Neurotol, 36(1), pp.172~177 (2015)
  14. Klopp-Dutote N, "A radiologic and anatomic study of the superior semicircular canal", Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 133(2), pp.91~94 (2016)
  15. Saliba I, "Superior canal dehiscence syndrome : clinical manifestations and radiologic correlations", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 271(11), pp.2905~2914 (2014)
  16. Cloutier JF, "Superior semicircular canal dehiscence : positive predictive value of high-resolution CT scanning", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 265(12), pp.1455~1460 (2008)
  17. Welgampola MS, "Characteristics and clinical applications of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials", Neurology, 64(10), pp.1682~1688 (2005)
  18. 김건우, "Capacity of Rectified Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential in Correcting Asymmetric Muscle Contraction Power", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 6(4), pp.209~213 (2013), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  19. Brantberg K, "Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in patients with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal", Acta Otolaryngol, 119(6), pp.633~640 (1999)
  20. Castellucci A, "Tympanometric findings in superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome", Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 33(2), pp.112~120 (2013)
  21. Polat Z, "Wideband tympanometry normative data for turkish young adult population", J Int Adv Otol, 11(2), pp.157~162 (2015)
  22. Sato E, "Tympanometric findings in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueducts", Laryngoscope, 112(9), pp.1642~1646 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

Third Window Syndrome: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review of Causes, Diagnosis, and TreatmentDelides Alexander, Korres George, Lazarou Ilias, Papadimitriou Nikolaos, Sideris Giorgos대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2025 · 제29권 제2호Clinical Applications of Wideband Tympanometry박무균대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2017 · 제60권 제8호Superior Canal Dehiscence Patients Have Smaller Mastoid Volume than Age- and Sex-Matched Otosclerosis and Temporal Bone Fracture PatientsByoung Soo Shim, Byung Chul Kang, Chang-Hee Kim, Hong Ju Park, Tae Su Kim대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2012 · 제16권 제3호Significance of Pseudo-Conductive Hearing Loss and Positional Nystagmus for Perilymphatic Fistula: Are They Related to Third-Window Effects?김민범, 김종세, 손세은, 정원호, 조영상대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2021 · 제14권 제3호Audiological and Vestibular Functions in Patients With Lateral Semicircular Canal Dysplasia and Aplasia곽상현, 김민기, 김성헌, 정진세대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2020 · 제13권 제3호한국인에서 측두골 전산화단층촬영 관상면 영상에서 상반고리관 피열의 발생률과 그 진단적 가치심현준, 안용휘, 이은섭, 조용태대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2018 · 제61권 제9호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)