본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Externally Monitored Versus Conventional Buried Flaps in Laryngopharyngeal Reconstruction

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives. To compare the surgical outcomes of externally monitored and conventional buried flaps with the goal of determining the usefulness of external monitoring of buried flaps. Methods. In this case-control study with propensity score matching, 30 patients were evenly divided into externally monitored buried flap and conventional buried flap groups. The total operative time for free flap reconstruction, the flap survival rate, the length of hospital stay, the initial time of a reliable visual assessment, complications, the final diet achieved, and the duration until diet initiation were compared between the groups. Results. The mean operative time for reconstruction was 115 minutes (interquartile range, 85–150 minutes) and 142 minutes (interquartile range, 95–180 minutes) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P= 0.245). The median length of hospital stay was 24 days (interquartile range, 18–30 days) and 27 days (interquartile range, 20–41 days) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P=0.298). The median duration until diet initiation was 15 days (interquartile range, 15–21 days) and 18 days (interquartile range, 15–34 days) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P=0.466). The final diet, initial time of a reliable visual assessment, and complications were comparable between the groups, but the external skin paddle provided an excellent visual assessment immediately postoperatively in all cases. Conclusion. The outcomes were comparable between the groups, indicating that externalization of the cutaneous component of a buried flap may be a straightforward and useful technique for monitoring a buried anterolateral thigh free flap in laryngopharyngeal reconstructions. The salvage and false-positive rates of compromised flaps should be compared in large subject groups in future studies to prove that the use of an external skin paddle improves flap monitoring.

Abstract

Objectives. To compare the surgical outcomes of externally monitored and conventional buried flaps with the goal of determining the usefulness of external monitoring of buried flaps. Methods. In this case-control study with propensity score matching, 30 patients were evenly divided into externally monitored buried flap and conventional buried flap groups. The total operative time for free flap reconstruction, the flap survival rate, the length of hospital stay, the initial time of a reliable visual assessment, complications, the final diet achieved, and the duration until diet initiation were compared between the groups. Results. The mean operative time for reconstruction was 115 minutes (interquartile range, 85–150 minutes) and 142 minutes (interquartile range, 95–180 minutes) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P= 0.245). The median length of hospital stay was 24 days (interquartile range, 18–30 days) and 27 days (interquartile range, 20–41 days) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P=0.298). The median duration until diet initiation was 15 days (interquartile range, 15–21 days) and 18 days (interquartile range, 15–34 days) in the externally monitored and conventional groups, respectively (P=0.466). The final diet, initial time of a reliable visual assessment, and complications were comparable between the groups, but the external skin paddle provided an excellent visual assessment immediately postoperatively in all cases. Conclusion. The outcomes were comparable between the groups, indicating that externalization of the cutaneous component of a buried flap may be a straightforward and useful technique for monitoring a buried anterolateral thigh free flap in laryngopharyngeal reconstructions. The salvage and false-positive rates of compromised flaps should be compared in large subject groups in future studies to prove that the use of an external skin paddle improves flap monitoring.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Chae MP, "Current evidence for postoperative monitoring of microvascular free flaps: a systematic review", Ann Plast Surg, 74(5), pp.621~632 (2015)
  2. Buncke HJ, "Microsurgery: transplantation-replantation, an atlas text" (1991), Lea & Febiger
  3. Disa JJ, "Efficacy of conventional monitoring techniques in free tissue transfer: an 11-year experience in 750 consecutive cases", Plast Reconstr Surg, 104(1), pp.97~101 (1999)
  4. Jones BM, "Monitors for the cutaneous microcirculation", Plast Reconstr Surg, 73(5), pp.843~850 (1984)
  5. Pellini R, "External monitor for buried free flaps in head and neck reconstructions", Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, 26(1), pp.1~6 (2006)
  6. Ferguson RE Jr, "Techniques of monitoring buried fasciocutaneous free flaps", Plast Reconstr Surg, 123(2), pp.525~532 (2009)
  7. Yu P, "Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap: a clinical and functional outcomes study", Plast Reconstr Surg, 116(7), pp.1845~1855 (2005)
  8. Yu P, "Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap after total laryngopharyngectomy", Cancer, 116(7), pp.1718~1724 (2010)
  9. Austin PC, "Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies", Pharm Stat, 10(2), pp.150~161 (2011)
  10. Lindau RH, "Buried free flaps in head and neck surgery: outcome analysis", Head Neck, 35(10), pp.1468~1470 (2013)
  11. 김상윤, "Esophageal Stent Insertion for Postesophagectomy Anastomosis Site Leakage", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 9(4), pp.382~384 (2016), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  12. Mehmet Haksever, "Modified Continuous Mucosal Connell Suture for the Pharyngeal Closure After Total Laryngectomy: Zipper Suture", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 8(3), pp.281~288 (2015), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  13. Pirracchio R, "Evaluation of the propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample size", BMC Med Res Methodol, 12, pp.70~ (2012)
  14. Chang EI, "Analysis of risk factors for flap loss and salvage in free flap head and neck reconstruction", Head Neck, 38(Suppl 1), pp.E771~E775 (2016)
  15. 김희진, "Results of Free Flap Reconstruction After Ablative Surgery in the Head and Neck", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 8(2), pp.167~173 (2015), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Long-Term Assessment of Speech and Swallowing Function in Laryngopharyngeal Cancer Patients After J-Flap ReconstructionChung-Kan Tsao, Hsiu-Feng Chuang, Li-Jen Hsin, Tuan-Jen Fang, Yi-An Lu대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2024 · 제17권 제4호Results of Free Flap Reconstruction After Ablative Surgery in the Head and Neck김희진, 안순현, 정우진대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2015 · 제8권 제2호Functional Benefit after Modification of Radial Forearm Free Flap for Soft Palate Reconstruction강정민, 김진환, 노영수, 배우진, 안회영, 오소정, 정철훈, 주형로대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2008 · 제1권 제3호Robot-Assisted Free Flap Reconstruction for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic ReviewDeepak Kalaskar, Panagiotis Vrakas, Raghav C Dwivedi대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2024 · 제67권 제2호하인두암종에서 전후두인두절제술 후 유리피판 재건술의 비교 연구태경, 김정태, 송창면, 안희창, 이동원, 지용배, 최의제대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2013 · 제56권 제9호Clinical Outcomes of a 14-Day In-Hospital Stay Program in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Cancer Surgery With Free Flap Reconstruction Under the National Health Insurance System김희정, 박종원, 백정환, 정만기, 정한신, 최성용, 최지은대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2019 · 제12권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)