본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Clinical Results of Atticoantrotomy with Attic Reconstruction or Attic bliteration for Patients with an Attic Cholesteatoma

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives. We aimed to investigate the clinical results of atticoantrotomy in patients with an attic cholesteatoma. Methods. Ninety-eight ears in 98 patients were operated on using atticoantrotomy between October 2002 and December 2006. A retrospective review of the otology database (operative findings and methods, postoperative physical examination and pre- and postoperative audiometry) was performed. Results. There were 58 female and 40 male patients with a mean age of 40 yr. The cholesteatoma was limited to the attic region in 24 patients (24.5%); attic with antrum in 18 (18.4%); and attic with antrum and middle ear in 56 (57.1%). Attic obliteration was performed in 59 patients (60.2%), attic reconstruction in 39 (39.8%) and ossicular reconstruction was performed in 59 (60.2%). The mean preoperative and postoperative air-bone gaps were 29.2±13.5 dB and 25.0±15.4 dB, respectively (P=0.01) and the mean preoperative and postoperative high-tone bone conduction levels were 14.5±9.7 dB and 15.23±14.0 dB, respectively (P=0.411). A recurrent cholesteatoma was detected in 3 ears (3%) and revision surgery was performed on these patients. Conclusion. Atticoantrotomy showed a low recurrence rate and no deterioration in hearing levels. If there is a intact malleus head or body of incus, attic reconstruction was possible and this procedure could lead to improved hearing. However, postoperative retraction occurred in 18% of patients, a problem that will need to be solved in the future.

Abstract

Objectives. We aimed to investigate the clinical results of atticoantrotomy in patients with an attic cholesteatoma. Methods. Ninety-eight ears in 98 patients were operated on using atticoantrotomy between October 2002 and December 2006. A retrospective review of the otology database (operative findings and methods, postoperative physical examination and pre- and postoperative audiometry) was performed. Results. There were 58 female and 40 male patients with a mean age of 40 yr. The cholesteatoma was limited to the attic region in 24 patients (24.5%); attic with antrum in 18 (18.4%); and attic with antrum and middle ear in 56 (57.1%). Attic obliteration was performed in 59 patients (60.2%), attic reconstruction in 39 (39.8%) and ossicular reconstruction was performed in 59 (60.2%). The mean preoperative and postoperative air-bone gaps were 29.2±13.5 dB and 25.0±15.4 dB, respectively (P=0.01) and the mean preoperative and postoperative high-tone bone conduction levels were 14.5±9.7 dB and 15.23±14.0 dB, respectively (P=0.411). A recurrent cholesteatoma was detected in 3 ears (3%) and revision surgery was performed on these patients. Conclusion. Atticoantrotomy showed a low recurrence rate and no deterioration in hearing levels. If there is a intact malleus head or body of incus, attic reconstruction was possible and this procedure could lead to improved hearing. However, postoperative retraction occurred in 18% of patients, a problem that will need to be solved in the future.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Chun YM, "Clinical appearances on the extension of attic cholesteatoma", Korean J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg, 41(1), pp.32~36 (1998)
  2. Stankovic M, "Follow-up of cholesteatoma surgery: open versus closed tympanoplasty", ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 69(5), pp.299~305 (2007)
  3. DeRowe A, "Long-term outcome of atticotomy for cholesteatoma in children", Otol Neurotol, 26(3), pp.472~475 (2005)
  4. Dornhoffer J, "Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1,000-patient series", Laryngoscope, 113(11), pp.1844~1856 (2003)
  5. Uzun C, "Eustachian tube patency and function in tympanoplasty with cartilage palisades or fascia after cholesteatoma surgery", Otol Neurotol, 25(6), pp.864~872 (2004)
  6. Bacciu A, "Reconstruction of outer attic wall defects using bone pate: Long-term clinical and histological evaluation", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 263(11), pp.983~987 (2006)
  7. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc, "Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 113(3), pp.186~187 (1995)
  8. Haynes DS, "Surgery for chronic ear disease", Ear Nose Throat J., 80(6), pp.8~11 (2001)
  9. Uyar Y, "Anterior atticoantrostomy for cholesteatoma surgery", Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 115(2), pp.150~155 (2006)
  10. Johnson RA, "Atticotomy. in: Surgery of the ear and temporal bone", pp.111~116 (1993), Raven Press
  11. Austin DF, "Single-stage surgery for cholesteatoma: an actuarial analysis", Am J Otol, 10(6), pp.419~425 (1989)
  12. Brown JS, "A ten year statistical follow-up of 1142 consecutive cases of cholesteatoma: the closed vs. the open technique", Laryngoscope, 92(4), pp.390~396 (1982)
  13. Dodson EE, "Intact canal wall mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma in children", Laryngoscope, 108(7), pp.977~983 (1998)
  14. Soldati D, "Cholesteatoma in children: techniques and results", Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 52(3), pp.269~276 (2000)
  15. Abramson M, "Results of conservative surgery for middle ear cholesteatoma", Laryngoscope, 87(8), pp.1281~1287 (1977)
  16. Sakai M, "Reconstruction of scutum defects (scutumplasty) for attic cholesteatoma", Am J Otol, 7(3), pp.188~192 (1986)
  17. Lee WS, "Mastoid and epitympanic obliteration in canal wall up mastoidectomy for prevention of retraction pocket", Otol Neurotol, 26(6), pp.1107~1111 (2005)
  18. Farrior JB, "Long-term results using ossicular grafts", Am J Otol, 17(3), pp.386~392 (1996)
  19. Palva T, "Aeration of Prussak’s space is independent of the supradiaphragmatic epitympanic compartments", Otol Neurotol, 28(2), pp.264~268 (2007)
  20. Palva T, "Attic aeration in temporal bones from children with recurring otitis media: tympanostomy tubes did not cure disease in Prussak’s space", Am J Otol, 21(4), pp.485~493 (2000)
  21. Toner JG, "Surgical treatment of cholesteatoma: a comparison of three techniques", Am J Otol., 11(4), pp.247~249 (1990)
  22. Chang CC, "Canal-wall-down tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy for advanced cholesteatoma", J Otolaryngol, 29(5), pp.270~273 (2000)
  23. Hirsch BE, "Single-stage management of cholesteatoma", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 106(4), pp.351~354 (1992)
  24. Stankovic MD, "Audiologic results of surgery for cholesteatoma: shortand long-term follow-up of influential factors", Otol Neurotol, 29(7), pp.933~940 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of the Clinical Results of Attic Cholesteatoma Treatment: Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Ear Surgery강우석, 배미례, 정종우대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2019 · 제12권 제2호Usefulness of the Attic Reconstruction Using the Tragal Cartilage and Perichondrium for Prevention of a Retraction Pocket김창우, Hyeon-Seong Kim, Jong Joo Lee, Moon Il Park, Sun-Min Park대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2011 · 제15권 제3호Obliteration of Radical Cavities and Total Reconstruction Procedure Without Staging After Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy: Long-term ResultsBor-Rong Huang, Chih-Hung Wang, Shao-Cheng Liu대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2015 · 제8권 제3호Frequency-Specific Hearing Results After Surgery for Chronic Ear Diseases여상원, 윤성현, 이동희, 장기홍, 전범조, 최형기대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2011 · 제4권 제3호Is Ossiculoplasty Necessary in Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy? Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Type 0 Tympanoplasty and OssiculoplastyPark Jin-A, Song Chan Il, Suh Michelle J., Yi Hee Jun대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2021 · 제25권 제2호Postoperative Mastoid Aeration Following Canal Wall Up Mastoidectomy according to Preoperative Middle Ear Disease: Analysis of Temporal Bone Computed Tomography Scans권오준, 김창우, 성재문, 정휘경대한청각학회 · Journal of Audiology & Otology2017 · 제21권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)