HEC-RAS를 이용한 하천변 농경지의 1, 2차원 연계 침수 모의
Combined 1D/2D Inundation Simulation of Riverside Farmland using HEC-RAS
4
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The objective of this study was to analyze the characteristics of combined 1D/2D inundation simulation of riverside farmland using the HydrologicEngineering Center – River Analysis System (HEC-RAS). We compared and analyzed inundation simulation results between 1D and combined 1D/2Dhydraulic simulation using HEC-RAS. Calibration and validation of stream stage were performed using three rainfall events. The coefficient ofdetermination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) between simulated and observed stream stage were 0.935 - 0.957 and 0.250 m - 0.283 m incalibration and validation, respectively. The inundation area showed no significant difference in 1D and combined 1D/2D simulation (8.48 km2 in 1Dsimulation, 8.75 km2 in combined 1D/2D simulation). The average inundation depth by 1D simulation was 1.4 m deeper than combined 1D/2Dsimulation. In the lower inundation depth, the inundation area by combined 1D/2D simulation was larger than inundation area by 1D simulation. Asthe inundation depth increased, the inundation area by 1D simulation became wider. In the case of the 1D/2D combined simulation, low elevation areasalong the river bank were inundated widely. Compared to 1D/2D combined simulation, the flood radius in some sections was longer in 1D simulation. In the 1D analysis, because the low altitude riverside farmlands are also assumed to stream, it is calculated that riverside farmlands have the same stageas the mainstream when the stream is overflowed. Therefore, the inundation area seems to be overestimated in those sections. In other regions, theinundation areas tend to be broken depending on overflow by each stream cross-section. In the case of river flooding, the overflow is expected to flowto the lower area depending on the terrain, such as the results of the combined 1D/2D simulation. It is concluded that the results of combined 1D/2Dinundation simulation reflected the topographical characteristics of low-lying farmland.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze the characteristics of combined 1D/2D inundation simulation of riverside farmland using the HydrologicEngineering Center – River Analysis System (HEC-RAS). We compared and analyzed inundation simulation results between 1D and combined 1D/2Dhydraulic simulation using HEC-RAS. Calibration and validation of stream stage were performed using three rainfall events. The coefficient ofdetermination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) between simulated and observed stream stage were 0.935 - 0.957 and 0.250 m - 0.283 m incalibration and validation, respectively. The inundation area showed no significant difference in 1D and combined 1D/2D simulation (8.48 km2 in 1Dsimulation, 8.75 km2 in combined 1D/2D simulation). The average inundation depth by 1D simulation was 1.4 m deeper than combined 1D/2Dsimulation. In the lower inundation depth, the inundation area by combined 1D/2D simulation was larger than inundation area by 1D simulation. Asthe inundation depth increased, the inundation area by 1D simulation became wider. In the case of the 1D/2D combined simulation, low elevation areasalong the river bank were inundated widely. Compared to 1D/2D combined simulation, the flood radius in some sections was longer in 1D simulation. In the 1D analysis, because the low altitude riverside farmlands are also assumed to stream, it is calculated that riverside farmlands have the same stageas the mainstream when the stream is overflowed. Therefore, the inundation area seems to be overestimated in those sections. In other regions, theinundation areas tend to be broken depending on overflow by each stream cross-section. In the case of river flooding, the overflow is expected to flowto the lower area depending on the terrain, such as the results of the combined 1D/2D simulation. It is concluded that the results of combined 1D/2Dinundation simulation reflected the topographical characteristics of low-lying farmland.
참고문헌 (17)
- Shahab Afshari, "Comparison of new generation low-complexity flood inundation mapping tools with a hydrodynamic model", Journal of Hydrology, 556, pp.539~556 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Brunner, G. W., "Combined 1D and 2D Modeling with HEC-RAS" (2014), USACE-HEC
- 전상민, "농업용 저수지 둑 높이기에 따른 홍수조절효과 분석", 한국농공학회논문집, 55(6), pp.57~68 (2013), 한국농공학회
- 김학관, "HEC-HMS와 HEC-RAS를 이용한 농촌 저지대 침수해석", 한국농공학회논문집, 54(2), pp.1~6 (2012), 한국농공학회[DOI]
- 김선정, "HEC-HMS", RAS와 HEC-GeoRAS 모형을 이용한 홍수범람 시나리오 수립 및 분석, 2013, pp.13(4), 199~205[DOI]
- 이춘호, "2차원 홍수범람해석을 위한 HEC-RAS 5.0 적용성 평가", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 17(4), pp.726~733 (2016), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- 이기하, "래스터 기반의 2차원 홍수범람 모형의 개발", 한국방재학회논문집, 10(6), pp.155~163 (2010), 한국방재학회
- Master plan reports of Cheongmi stream, "Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT)", ~ (2011)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT), "Guidelines for establishing the master plan of the stream" (2015)
- Annual report of disaster 2016, "Ministry of the Interior and Safety (MOIS)", ~ (2017)
- Dhruvesh P. Patel, "Assessment of flood inundation mapping of Surat city by coupled 1D", 2D hydrodynamic modeling: a case application of the new HEC-RAS 5, 2017, pp.89(1), 93~130[DOI]
- 류정훈, "비정상성을 고려한 원평천 유역의 미래 설계홍수량 산정", 한국농공학회논문집, 57(5), pp.139~152 (2015), 한국농공학회
- 류정훈, "강우의 비정상성을 고려한 청미천 유역의 미래 침수특성 분석", 한국농공학회논문집, 59(1), pp.81~96 (2017), 한국농공학회
- 신샛별, "홍수위 해석을 위한 미측정 하천 단면 추정", 한국농공학회논문집, 58(5), pp.11~18 (2016), 한국농공학회
- US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center, "HEC-RAS 2D modeling user's Manual" (2016)
- US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center, "HEC-RAS hydraulic reference manual version 5.0" (2016)
- Anthi-Eirini K. Vozinaki, "Comparing 1D and combined 1D", 2D hydraulic simulations using high-resolution topographic data: a case study of the Koiliaris basin, Greece, 2016, pp.62(4), 642~656[DOI]
