Evaporative Stress Index (ESI)의 국내 가뭄 심도 분류 기준 제시
Percentile Approach of Drought Severity Classification in Evaporative Stress Index for South Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Drought is considered as a devastating hazard that causes serious agricultural, ecological and socio-economic impacts worldwide. Fundamentally, thedrought can be defined as temporarily different levels of inadequate precipitation, soil moisture, and water supply relative to the long-term averageconditions. From no unified definition of droughts, droughts have been divided into different severity level, i.e., moderate drought, severe drought,extreme drought and exceptional drought. The drought severity classification defined the ranges for each indicator for each dryness level. Becausethe ranges of the various indicators often don’t coincide, the final drought category tends to be based on what the majority of the indicators showand on local observations. Evaporative Stress Index (ESI), a satellite-based drought index using the ratio of potential and actual evaporation, is beingused as a index of the droughts occurring rapidly in a short period of time from studies showing a more sensitive and fast response to droughtcompared to Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), and Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI). However, ESI is difficult to provide an objectivedrought assessment because it does not have clear drought severity classification criteria. In this study, U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM), the standardfor drought determination used in the United States, was applied to ESI, and the Percentile method was used to classify drought categories by severity. Regarding the actual 2017 drought event in South Korea, we compare the spatial distribution of drought area and understand the USDM-based ESIby comparing the results of Standardized Groundwater level Index (SGI) and drought impact information. These results demonstrated that theUSDM-based ESI could be an effective tool to provide objective drought conditions to inform management decisions for drought policy.
Abstract
Drought is considered as a devastating hazard that causes serious agricultural, ecological and socio-economic impacts worldwide. Fundamentally, thedrought can be defined as temporarily different levels of inadequate precipitation, soil moisture, and water supply relative to the long-term averageconditions. From no unified definition of droughts, droughts have been divided into different severity level, i.e., moderate drought, severe drought,extreme drought and exceptional drought. The drought severity classification defined the ranges for each indicator for each dryness level. Becausethe ranges of the various indicators often don’t coincide, the final drought category tends to be based on what the majority of the indicators showand on local observations. Evaporative Stress Index (ESI), a satellite-based drought index using the ratio of potential and actual evaporation, is beingused as a index of the droughts occurring rapidly in a short period of time from studies showing a more sensitive and fast response to droughtcompared to Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), and Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI). However, ESI is difficult to provide an objectivedrought assessment because it does not have clear drought severity classification criteria. In this study, U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM), the standardfor drought determination used in the United States, was applied to ESI, and the Percentile method was used to classify drought categories by severity. Regarding the actual 2017 drought event in South Korea, we compare the spatial distribution of drought area and understand the USDM-based ESIby comparing the results of Standardized Groundwater level Index (SGI) and drought impact information. These results demonstrated that theUSDM-based ESI could be an effective tool to provide objective drought conditions to inform management decisions for drought policy.
참고문헌 (37)
- Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, "Allen, R. G.", Food and Agriculture Organization, ~, pp.FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 (1998)
- Anderson, M. C., "A climatological study of evapotranspiration and moisture stress across the continental U.S. based on thermal remote sensing: I. model formulation", Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, pp.D10117~ (2007)[DOI]
- Anderson, M. C., "Evaluation of drought indices based on thermal remote sensing of evapotranspiration over the continental United States", Journal of Climate, 24, pp.2025~2044 (2011)[DOI]
- Anderson, M. C., "An intercomparison of drought indicators based on thermal remote sensing and NLDAS-2 simulations with U.S. drought monitor classifications", Journal of Hydrometeorology, 14, pp.1035~1056 (2013)[DOI]
- Anderson, M. C., "Comparison of satellitederived LAI and precipitation anomalies over Brazil with a thermal infrared-based evaporative stress index for 2003-2013", Journal of Hydrology, 526, pp.287~302 (2015)[DOI]
- Anderson, M. C., "The evaporative stress index as an indicator of agricultural drought in Brazil : An assessment based on crop yield impacts", Remote Sensing of Environment, 174(1), pp.82~99 (2016)[DOI]
- Bloomfield, J. P., "Analysis of groundwater drought using a variant of the standarised precipitation index", Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 10(6), pp.7537~7574 (2013)[DOI]
- Du Pisani, L. G., "Assessing rangeland drought in South Africa", Agricultural Systems, 57(3), pp.367~380 (1998)[DOI]
- Hayes, M. J., "Reducing drought risk : Bridging theory and practice", Natural Hazards Review, 5(2), pp.106~113 (2004)[DOI]
- Heim, R. R., "A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States", Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(8), pp.1149~1165 (2002)[DOI]
- 홍은미, "토양수분모형을 이용한 주요 밭작물의 미래 가뭄 전망 -전라남도지역을 중심으로-", 한국농공학회논문집, 57(3), pp.65~76 (2015), 한국농공학회
- Keyantash, J., "The quantification of drought : An evaluation of drought indices", Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(8), pp.1167~1180 (2002)[DOI]
- 김세진, "제한적인 기상자료 조건에서의 잠재증발산량 추정을 위한 FAO56 Penman-Monteith 방법의 적용성 분석 - 안동댐 유역을 사례로 -", 한국기후변화학회지, 8(2), pp.125~143 (2017), 한국기후변화학회[DOI]
- 2017abnormal climate report, "Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA)", Korea Meteorological Administration, ~ (2018)
- 이정주, "가뭄 분석을 위한 지하수위 모니터링 및 예측기법 개발(Ⅰ) - 표준지하수지수(SGI)를 이용한 지하수 가뭄 모니터링", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 51(11), pp.1011~1020 (2018), 한국수자원학회[DOI]
- 이희진, "Evaporative Stress Index (ESI)를 활용한 북한의 위성영상기반 농업가뭄 평가", 한국농공학회논문집, 61(3), pp.1~14 (2019), 한국농공학회[DOI]
- McKee, T. B., "The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales", Proceedings of the 8th Conference of Applied Climatology, pp.179~184 (1993), American Meteorological Society
- 문영식, "위성기반 Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station (CHIRPS)를 활용한한반도 지역의 기상학적 가뭄지수 적용", 한국농공학회논문집, 61(2), pp.1~11 (2019), 한국농공학회[DOI]
- 남원호, "A Real-Time Online Drought Broadcast System for Monitoring Soil Moisture Index", KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(3), pp.357~365 (2012), 대한토목학회
- Nam, W. H., "Drought management and policy based on risk assessment in the context of climate change", Magazine of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, 56(2), pp.2~15 (2014)
- 남원호, "식생가뭄반응지수 (VegDRI)를 활용한 위성영상 기반 가뭄 평가", 한국농공학회논문집, 57(4), pp.1~9 (2015), 한국농공학회
- Nam, W. H., "Drought hazard assessment in the context of climate change for South Korea", Agricultural Water Management, 160, pp.106~117 (2015)[DOI]
- 남원호, "주단위 표준강수증발산지수를 활용한 2014~2015년 북한의 극한 가뭄 평가", 한국농공학회논문집, 59(4), pp.65~74 (2017), 한국농공학회[DOI]
- Norman, J. M., "Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature", Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 77(3-4), pp.263~292 (1995)[DOI]
- Otkin, J. A., "Examining rapid onset drought development using thermal infrared-based evaporative stress index", Journal of Hydrometeorology, 14, pp.1057~1074 (2013)[DOI]
- Otkin, J. A., "Examining the relationship between drought development and rapid changes in the evaporative stress index", Journal of Hydrometeorology, 15, pp.938~956 (2014)[DOI]
- Meteorological drought, "Palmer, W. C.", US Department of Commerce Weather Bureau, ~, pp.Research Paper 45 (1965)
- Smith, A. D., "US billion-dollar weather and climate disasters : Data sources, trends, accuracy and biases", Natural Hazards, 67, pp.387~410 (2013)[DOI]
- 손경환, "미래 기후·수문 정보에 따른 국내 가뭄의 전망 및 분석", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 47(1), pp.71~82 (2014), 한국수자원학회
- Steinemann, A., "Drought triggers : A stochastic approach to evaluation", Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39(5), pp.1217~1234 (2003)[DOI]
- Sternberg, T., "Regional drought has a global impact", Nature, 472, pp.169~ (2011)[DOI]
- 서찬양, "인공위성 가뭄지수를 활용한 한반도 가뭄 평가; 2013년 남부지방가뭄을 대상으로", 한국방재학회논문집, 14(3), pp.127~131 (2014), 한국방재학회
- Svoboda, M., "The drought monitor", Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(8), pp.1181~1190 (2002)[DOI]
- Wilhite, D. A., "Understanding the drought phenomenon : The role of definitions", Water International, 10(3), pp.111~120 (1985)[DOI]
- Wilhite, D. A., "Planning for drought : Moving from crisis to risk management", Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36(4), pp.697~710 (2000)[DOI]
- Xia, Y., "Application of USDM statistics in NLDAS-2 : Optimal blended NLDAS drought index over the continen-tal United States", Journal of Geophysical Research : Atmosphere, 119, pp.2947~2965 (2014)[DOI]
- 윤동현, "위성영상기반 농업가뭄 모니터링을 위한 Evaporative Stress Index (ESI)의 적용성 평가", 한국농공학회논문집, 60(6), pp.121~131 (2018), 한국농공학회[DOI]