본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Core Needle Biopsy May Predict Prognosis Preoperatively in Parotid Cancer

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives. Salivary gland tumors present a diagnostic challenge, with preoperative false-negative results frequently leading to an unexpected diagnosis of malignancy after parotidectomy. This study was conducted to explore the clinical utili- ty of preoperative core needle biopsy (CNB) in diagnosing malignancies before primary parotidectomy and to assess the prognostic implications of CNB for parotid gland cancers. Methods. This retrospective cohort study included 615 patients who underwent preoperative CNB and parotidectomy for primary parotid tumors from 2003 to 2023 at a tertiary referral hospital. Among these patients, 102 who were diag- nosed with primary parotid malignancy following parotidectomy were examined regarding survival outcomes. Dis- ease-free survival (DFS) and predictive factors were assessed through univariable and multivariable analyses. The sen- sitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of CNB were determined. These metrics were then compared to those of a separate cohort of 547 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and parotidectomy within the same timeframe. Results. In the CNB group, the 5-year predicted DFS was 86.9% (95% CI, 79.2%–95.3%). Multivariable analysis identi- fied male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 8.48; 95% CI, 1.05–68.76) and a CNB finding of malignancy (HR, 8.20; 95% CI, 1.01–66.15) as factors significantly associated with decreased DFS. CNB demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (89.0%; 95% CI, 81.2%–94.4%) and NPV (97.6%; 95% CI, 95.7%–98.8%) compared to FNA, which had a sensi- tivity of 45.2% (95% CI, 33.5%–57.3%) and an NPV of 90.8% (95% CI, 87.7%–93.3%). Conclusion. Preoperative CNB may be predictive of parotid cancer prognosis. Patients receiving a diagnosis of malignancy on preoperative CNB demonstrated a worse prognosis compared to those with a “less-than-malignant” diagnosis. Additionally, CNB exhibited higher sensitivity than FNA in identifying malignancies of the parotid gland.

Abstract

Objectives. Salivary gland tumors present a diagnostic challenge, with preoperative false-negative results frequently leading to an unexpected diagnosis of malignancy after parotidectomy. This study was conducted to explore the clinical utili- ty of preoperative core needle biopsy (CNB) in diagnosing malignancies before primary parotidectomy and to assess the prognostic implications of CNB for parotid gland cancers. Methods. This retrospective cohort study included 615 patients who underwent preoperative CNB and parotidectomy for primary parotid tumors from 2003 to 2023 at a tertiary referral hospital. Among these patients, 102 who were diag- nosed with primary parotid malignancy following parotidectomy were examined regarding survival outcomes. Dis- ease-free survival (DFS) and predictive factors were assessed through univariable and multivariable analyses. The sen- sitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of CNB were determined. These metrics were then compared to those of a separate cohort of 547 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and parotidectomy within the same timeframe. Results. In the CNB group, the 5-year predicted DFS was 86.9% (95% CI, 79.2%–95.3%). Multivariable analysis identi- fied male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 8.48; 95% CI, 1.05–68.76) and a CNB finding of malignancy (HR, 8.20; 95% CI, 1.01–66.15) as factors significantly associated with decreased DFS. CNB demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (89.0%; 95% CI, 81.2%–94.4%) and NPV (97.6%; 95% CI, 95.7%–98.8%) compared to FNA, which had a sensi- tivity of 45.2% (95% CI, 33.5%–57.3%) and an NPV of 90.8% (95% CI, 87.7%–93.3%). Conclusion. Preoperative CNB may be predictive of parotid cancer prognosis. Patients receiving a diagnosis of malignancy on preoperative CNB demonstrated a worse prognosis compared to those with a “less-than-malignant” diagnosis. Additionally, CNB exhibited higher sensitivity than FNA in identifying malignancies of the parotid gland.

관련 논문AI추천

Accuracy of Core Needle Biopsy Versus Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology for Diagnosing Salivary Gland Tumors김상윤, 남순열, 노종렬, 백정환, 성창옥, 송인혜, 송준선, 이정현, 조경자, 최승호대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2015 · 제49권 제2호낭성 타액선 종양의 수술 전 진단에서 초음파 유도하 세침흡인검사와 비교한 중심바늘생검의 유용성이혜란, 조영록, 조윤진, 홍현준대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2023 · 제66권 제8호Comparison of Partial Versus Superficial or Total Parotidectomy for Superficial T1-2 Primary Parotid Cancers강정욱, Dong Jin Lee, Heejin Kim, Il-Seok Park, Jihae Lee, Jin Hwan Kim, Seung Hoon Han대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2024 · 제17권 제1호이하선암종 환자에서 무병생존율에 미치는 위험인자에 관한 고찰: 10년 단일 기관 연구김상훈, 성의숙, 신성찬, 이민형, 이병주, 이진춘, 조현주, 천용일대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2023 · 제66권 제1호침샘관암: 12년간의 단일기관에서의 경험곽지혜, 안동빈, 안효원대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2025 · 제68권 제6호Clinical History, Prognostic Factors, and Management of Facial Nerve in Malignant Tumors of the Parotid GlandEugenio De Corso, Francesco Bussu, Gaetano Paludetti, Giovanni Almadori, Giovanni Bastanza, Mario Rigante, Veronica Giglia대한이비인후과학회 · Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology2014 · 제7권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)