본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

농업소유역의 홍수유출량 추정을 위한 단위도 모형 비교연구

A Comparative Study of Unit Hydrograph Models for Flood Runoff Simulation at a Small Watershed

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

In this study, three different unit hydrograph methods (Snyder, SCS, Clark) in the HEC-HMS were compared to find better fit with the observed data in the small agricultural watershed. Baran watershed, having 3.85km² in size, was selected as a study watershed. The watershed input data for HEC-HMS were retrieved using HEC-GeoHMS which was developed to assist making GIS input data for HEC-HMS. Rainfall and water flow data were monitored since 1996 for the study watershed. Fifty five storms from 1996 to 2003 were selected for model calibration and validation. Three unit hydrograph methods were compared with the observed data in terms of simulated peak runoff, peak time and total direct runoff for the selected storms. The results showed that the coefficient of determination (R²) for the observed peak runoff was 0.8666~0.8736 and root mean square error, RMSE, was 5.25~6.37 m³/s for calibration stages. In the model validations, R2 for the observed peak runoff was 0.8588~0.8638 and RMSE was 9.57~11.80 m³/s, which were slightly less accurate than the calibrated data. The simulated flood hydrographs were well compared with the observed data. SCS unit hydrograph method showed best fit, but there was no significant difference among the three unit hydrograph methods.

Abstract

In this study, three different unit hydrograph methods (Snyder, SCS, Clark) in the HEC-HMS were compared to find better fit with the observed data in the small agricultural watershed. Baran watershed, having 3.85km² in size, was selected as a study watershed. The watershed input data for HEC-HMS were retrieved using HEC-GeoHMS which was developed to assist making GIS input data for HEC-HMS. Rainfall and water flow data were monitored since 1996 for the study watershed. Fifty five storms from 1996 to 2003 were selected for model calibration and validation. Three unit hydrograph methods were compared with the observed data in terms of simulated peak runoff, peak time and total direct runoff for the selected storms. The results showed that the coefficient of determination (R²) for the observed peak runoff was 0.8666~0.8736 and root mean square error, RMSE, was 5.25~6.37 m³/s for calibration stages. In the model validations, R2 for the observed peak runoff was 0.8588~0.8638 and RMSE was 9.57~11.80 m³/s, which were slightly less accurate than the calibrated data. The simulated flood hydrographs were well compared with the observed data. SCS unit hydrograph method showed best fit, but there was no significant difference among the three unit hydrograph methods.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 강문성, "인공신경망 원격탐사기법과 비점 오염모델을 이용한 오염총량모의시스템 개발", 박사, pp.2002
  2. 김상민, "GIS를 이용한 침수모의모 형의 적용", 한국농공학회 학술발표회 논문집, pp.314~318 (2001)
  3. 김철겸, "논에서의 유출특성을 고려한 농 업 소유역의 홍수유출 추정", 석사, pp.1999
  4. 김현준, "2매개변수 쌍곡선형 일유출 모형 의 개발", 박사, pp.2001
  5. 박종민, "GIS를 이용한 농경지 침수피해 모의시스템 개발", 박사, pp.2003
  6. 임상준, "논의 유출곡선번호 추정", 한국수자원학회지, 30(4), pp.379~387 (1997)
  7. "하천설계기준", 한국수자원학회, pp.275~ (2005)
  8. 허기술, "한국토양의 수문학적 분 류 및 그 응용", 농공기술, pp.48~60 (1988)
  9. Clark, C. O., "Storage and the unit hydrograph", Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng, 110, pp.1419~1446 (1945)
  10. Crawford, H. H., "Digital simulation in hydrology: Stanford Watershed Model", IV Tech. Rep (1966)
  11. Mockus, V., "Use of Storm and Watershed Characteristics in Synthetic Hydrograph Analysis and Application" (1957)
  12. Snyder, F. F., "Synthetic unit-graphs", Transaction of American Geophysical Union, 19, pp.447~454 (1938)
  13. Singh, Vijay P., "Mathmatical modeling of watershed hydrology", Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 7(4), pp.270~292 (2002), American Society of Civil Engineers
  14. "USACE, 1998, HEC-1 flood hydrograph package user's manual, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA", ~ (1998)
  15. "USACE, 2001a, HEC-HMS(version 2.1): Hydrologic Modeling System, User's Manual, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA", ~ (2001)
  16. "USACE, 2001b, HEC-GeoHMS(version 3.0): River Analysis System, User's Manual, Hydologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA", ~ (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)