제인 에어와 주변 인물들과의 관계유형—사르트르, 부버, 레비나스의 타자이론을 중심으로
Three Relationships between Jane Eyre and the others in Jane Eyre
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Any human-being can't live alone. Our self-recognition and subjectivity are deeply rooted in the relationship of many others, and we live with consciousness of the Other. In Jane Eyre, Jane comes into various others until she identifies herself independent subject with self-consciousness. Among the relationship-types, three Other theories of Sartre, Buber, Levinas could be properly appropriated and productively applied to the analysis of various characters around Jane Eyre. According to the Other theory of Sartre, the subject and the other never come into equal relations, dominate and neglect each other. As a result, the relationship only begets conflict and hate. But if the Other being to attack and control does not exist, and even this relationship is aggressive and selfish, the subject also can't get a proper identity. In theories of Buber and Levinas, however, also subject and the other exist as existence to support each other, they construct mutual relationship by interaction. The theories of Buber and Levinas is a propose alternative strategies against Sartre. Buber puts emphasis on ‘I-You' which is a relationship that stresses the mutual than ‘I-It'. The relationship of ‘I-You' is built on respect from difference of the Other, and the relationship of coexistence may maintained well without division. Furthermore, Levinas argues that responsibility for the Other is rooted within our subjective constitution. He based on the ethics of the Other, and stresses that we should accept others as inferior existence. Levinas insists that the most ethical and ideal relationship is to admit the difference of the other by devoting to them and serving and caring in mutual relationship. This thesis connects the theories of three philosophers to Charlotte Brontë's novel, Jane Eyre and then classify the characters around Jane Eyre into three types of human relationships from the perspective each theory. Especially, it is very interesting to change the relationship between Jane and Rochester dynamically and contain the three theories in the novel. Disscussion of the other in a novel can make it possible that we realize right perception of relationship with the other out of the opposition of dichotomy in the literary works. Also, it should be a wise strategy that any attempt to make a true understanding the others, is not simply for interpretation of literary works, but also for harmonious human relationship in general.
Abstract
Any human-being can't live alone. Our self-recognition and subjectivity are deeply rooted in the relationship of many others, and we live with consciousness of the Other. In Jane Eyre, Jane comes into various others until she identifies herself independent subject with self-consciousness. Among the relationship-types, three Other theories of Sartre, Buber, Levinas could be properly appropriated and productively applied to the analysis of various characters around Jane Eyre. According to the Other theory of Sartre, the subject and the other never come into equal relations, dominate and neglect each other. As a result, the relationship only begets conflict and hate. But if the Other being to attack and control does not exist, and even this relationship is aggressive and selfish, the subject also can't get a proper identity. In theories of Buber and Levinas, however, also subject and the other exist as existence to support each other, they construct mutual relationship by interaction. The theories of Buber and Levinas is a propose alternative strategies against Sartre. Buber puts emphasis on ‘I-You' which is a relationship that stresses the mutual than ‘I-It'. The relationship of ‘I-You' is built on respect from difference of the Other, and the relationship of coexistence may maintained well without division. Furthermore, Levinas argues that responsibility for the Other is rooted within our subjective constitution. He based on the ethics of the Other, and stresses that we should accept others as inferior existence. Levinas insists that the most ethical and ideal relationship is to admit the difference of the other by devoting to them and serving and caring in mutual relationship. This thesis connects the theories of three philosophers to Charlotte Brontë's novel, Jane Eyre and then classify the characters around Jane Eyre into three types of human relationships from the perspective each theory. Especially, it is very interesting to change the relationship between Jane and Rochester dynamically and contain the three theories in the novel. Disscussion of the other in a novel can make it possible that we realize right perception of relationship with the other out of the opposition of dichotomy in the literary works. Also, it should be a wise strategy that any attempt to make a true understanding the others, is not simply for interpretation of literary works, but also for harmonious human relationship in general.
참고문헌 (14)
- 길버트, 산드라, "다락방의 미친 여자" (2009), 이후
- 데이비스, 콜린, "엠마누엘 레비나스-타자를 향한 욕망" (2001), 다산글방
- 레비나스, 엠마누엘, "시간과 타자" (1996), 문예출판사
- 부버, 마르틴, "나와 너" (2001), 문예출판사
- 브론테, 샬럿, "제인 에어1,2" (2004), 민음사
- 사르트르, 장 폴, "존재와 무" (1977), 삼성출판사
- 송욱, "문물의 타작" (1978), 문학과 지성사
- 정명환, "사르트르와 20세기" (1999), 문학과 지성사
- 황원권, "현대 철학 산책" (1996), 백산서당
- Brontë,Charlotte, "Jane Eyre" (2008), Oxford UP
- Buber,Martin, "I and Thou" (1970), Simon & Schuster
- Sartre,Jean Paul, "Being and Nothingness" (1953), Washington Square Press
- Sloman, Judith, "Jane Eyre's Childhood and Popular Children's Literature", Children's Literature, 3, pp.107~116 (1974)
- Levinas, Emmanuel, "Time and the Other" (1987), Duquesne UP
