『성녀 조안』에 나타난 쇼와 버틀러의 도덕률—반-성직주의의 도그마
The New Morality of Shaw and Butler in Saint Joan: An Anti-clerical Dogma
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay explores Saint Joan in terms of anti-clericalism and anti-jingoism to reveal how institutional religious hypocritical society is irreligious compared to Joan's individualism and protestantism as a savior and agent of life force. She finds herself to save conventional society and humanity through self-recognition as an agent of new religion. By Joan's merciful morality of new religion, instead of institutional religious authority, humankind can be saved and reached further development for the betterment of humanity, which is the elements of unconventional religion what Shaw and Butler insist throughout their views. Shaw's criticism of orthodox religion in the nineteenth century is generally similar to that of Samuel Butler. Both Shaw and Butler were opposed and attacked ethical dualism and hypocritical conventionality of Christianity. Instead, for the modern religion, they emphasized evolutionism with purposive creative force. They regarded men as instruments carrying on the purpose of life and aim of humanity by fulfilling their religious duties. Accordingly, Saint Joan is the play which carries out that purpose most effectively.
Abstract
This essay explores Saint Joan in terms of anti-clericalism and anti-jingoism to reveal how institutional religious hypocritical society is irreligious compared to Joan's individualism and protestantism as a savior and agent of life force. She finds herself to save conventional society and humanity through self-recognition as an agent of new religion. By Joan's merciful morality of new religion, instead of institutional religious authority, humankind can be saved and reached further development for the betterment of humanity, which is the elements of unconventional religion what Shaw and Butler insist throughout their views. Shaw's criticism of orthodox religion in the nineteenth century is generally similar to that of Samuel Butler. Both Shaw and Butler were opposed and attacked ethical dualism and hypocritical conventionality of Christianity. Instead, for the modern religion, they emphasized evolutionism with purposive creative force. They regarded men as instruments carrying on the purpose of life and aim of humanity by fulfilling their religious duties. Accordingly, Saint Joan is the play which carries out that purpose most effectively.
참고문헌 (33)
- Berst, Charles A., "As Kingfishers Catch Fire: The Saints and Poetics of Shaw and T. S. Eliot", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 14, pp.105~125 (1994)
- Bertolini, John A., "Imaging Saint Joan", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 3, pp.149~161 (1983)
- Brinton, Alan, "Following Nature in Butler's Sermons", The Philosophical Quarterly, 41, pp.325~332 (1991)
- Butler, Samuel, "Erewhon" (1919), Fifield
- Butler, Samuel, "Erewhon Revisited" (1921), Cape
- Coskeren, Robert, "Siegfried Elements in the Plays of Bernard Shaw", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 2, pp.27~46 (1982)
- Crompton, Louis, "Shaw the Dramatist" (1969), U of Nebraska P
- Cummings, Constance, "Playing Joan on Radio and Television", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 4, pp.139~147 (1984)
- Crane, M. Gladys, "Shaw and Women's Lib", The Shaw Review, 3, pp.23~31 (1960)
- Dervin, Daniel, "Bernard Shaw: A Psychological Study" (1975), Associated UP
- Esslin, Martin, "Text and Subtext in Shavian Drama", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 9, pp.200~207 (1994)
- Evans, T. F., "“Introduction: The Political Shaw", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 14, pp.1~19 (1994)
- Gahan, Peter, "Meditations in Time of Civil War: Back to Methuselah and Saint Joan in Production, 1918-1924", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 30, pp.147~160 (2010)
- Hadfield, D., "Joan Rehabilitated", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 29, pp.201~206 (2009)
- Henderson, Archibald, "Bernard Shaw: Playboy and Prophet" (1932), Appleton-Century-Crofts
- Hodgson, Terry, "Modern Drama from Ibsen to Fugard" (1992), Batsford
- Hollis, Christopher, "Mr Shaw’s St. Joan", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 2, pp.159~169 (1982)
- Holt, Lee Elbert, "Samuel Butler and His Victorian Critics", ELH, 8, pp.146~159 (1941)
- Joad, C. E. M., "Samuel Butler" (1924), Whitefriers
- Larson, Gale K., "General Introduction: Shaw and History", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 19, pp.1~6 (1999)
- MacCarthy, Desmond, "Saint Joan Fifty Years After. ed. Stanley Weintraub" (1973), Louisiana State UP
- Morpurgo, H., "Samuel Butler, or The Art of Being Funny about Religion", PN Review, 187, pp.56~63 (2009)
- Obraztsoza, A., "Saint Joan Fifty Years After" (1973), Louisiana State UP
- Shaw, Bernard, "Saint Joan" (1946), Penguin
- Shaw, Bernard, "Major Critical Essays" (1932), Constable
- Shaw, Bernard, "The Shewing-up of Blanco Posnet" (1932), Constable
- Shaw, Bernard, "The Religious Speeches of Bernard Shaw" (1963), McGraw-Hill
- Shaw, Bernard, "Man and Superman" (1946), Penguin
- Wallmann, Jeffrey M., "See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil: The Alienation Factors in Shaw’s Drama", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 18, pp.81~95 (1998)
- Watson, Barbara Bellow, "The New Woman and the New Comedy", The Shaw Review, 17, pp.2~16 (1974)
- Withenthal, J. L., "Shaw and Ra: Religion and Some History Plays", Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies, 1, pp.45~56 (1981)
- Withenthal, J. L., "Shaw’s Sense of History" (1988), Oxford UP
- Whitman, Robert F., "Shaw and the Play of Ideas" (1977), Cornell UP