본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『에드워드 2세』 -동성애와 정치적 욕망

Edward II: Homoeroticism and Political Desire

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The homoeroticism between king Edward and Gaveston in Edward II matters not because of its moral aspect but because of its political aspect. We cannot be sure if the relationship of Edward and Gaveston is condemning sin or pure affection. But it is certain that their relationship has great influence on the English political state in the play. Edward is not a common man, but a king. And a king’s homoeroticism in the Medieval and Renaissance society may certainly undermine the absolute authority of kingship. Actually there are many nobles who disobey and ignore Edward’s authority in the play, and Edward’s minion Gaveston’s arrogance and slyness also undermine the authority of Edward’s kingship. Marlowe advocates for neither Gaveston nor the nobles. Rather by revealing their hidden political ambitions and selfish desires, Marlowe pays attention to the political conflicts and the undermined kingship. However, it is Edward himself who undermines the political myth and authority of kingship most. His addiction to love of Gaveston becomes the dramatic means to deny even his own kingship. The three groups making conflicts in this play are all in pursuit of their own desires: Gaveston and Spencer desire power using Edward’s affection; Mortimer and the nobles also desire their political power even threatening the king Edward; and Edward himself desires Gaveston. The minions and the nobles are hypocritical in that they emphasize loyalty to the king and the kingdom. However, Edward doesn’t have the Machiavellian hypocrisy and duplicity, from which Edward’s misfortune derives. The desires of these three groups deny the political ideology of sacred kingship. Although Marlowe deals with homoeroticism in Edward II, what matters is not the result of the moral corruption. Marlowe focuses on the political desire which lies on the other side of homosexuality, demythifying absolute kingship.

Abstract

The homoeroticism between king Edward and Gaveston in Edward II matters not because of its moral aspect but because of its political aspect. We cannot be sure if the relationship of Edward and Gaveston is condemning sin or pure affection. But it is certain that their relationship has great influence on the English political state in the play. Edward is not a common man, but a king. And a king’s homoeroticism in the Medieval and Renaissance society may certainly undermine the absolute authority of kingship. Actually there are many nobles who disobey and ignore Edward’s authority in the play, and Edward’s minion Gaveston’s arrogance and slyness also undermine the authority of Edward’s kingship. Marlowe advocates for neither Gaveston nor the nobles. Rather by revealing their hidden political ambitions and selfish desires, Marlowe pays attention to the political conflicts and the undermined kingship. However, it is Edward himself who undermines the political myth and authority of kingship most. His addiction to love of Gaveston becomes the dramatic means to deny even his own kingship. The three groups making conflicts in this play are all in pursuit of their own desires: Gaveston and Spencer desire power using Edward’s affection; Mortimer and the nobles also desire their political power even threatening the king Edward; and Edward himself desires Gaveston. The minions and the nobles are hypocritical in that they emphasize loyalty to the king and the kingdom. However, Edward doesn’t have the Machiavellian hypocrisy and duplicity, from which Edward’s misfortune derives. The desires of these three groups deny the political ideology of sacred kingship. Although Marlowe deals with homoeroticism in Edward II, what matters is not the result of the moral corruption. Marlowe focuses on the political desire which lies on the other side of homosexuality, demythifying absolute kingship.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Bartels, Emily. C., "Spectacles of Strangeness: Imperialism, Alienation, and Marlowe" (1993), U of Pennsylvania P
  2. Bartels, Emily C., "Christopher Marlowe in Context" (2013), Cambridge UP
  3. Breight, Curtis C, "Surveillance, Militarism and Drama in the Elizabethan Era" (1996), Macmillan
  4. Cartelli, Thomas, "Christopher Marlowe", pp.174~190 (1999), Longman
  5. Clark, David, "Marlowe and Queer Theory", pp.232~241, Bartels and Smith
  6. Deats, Sarah Munson, "Sex, Gender and Desire in the Plays of Christopher Marlowe" (1997), U of Delaware P
  7. Deats, Sarah Munson, "Marlowe’s Empery: Expanding his Critical Context", pp.107~130 (2002), U of Delaware P
  8. Kantorowicz, Ernst H., "The King's Two Bodies A Study in Medieval Political Theology" (1981), Princeton UP
  9. Kewes, Paulina, "Marlowe, History, and Politics", pp.138~154, Bartels and Smith
  10. Lunney, Ruth, "Placing the Plays of Christopher Marlowe: Fresh Cultural Context", pp.25~42 (2008), Ashgate
  11. Marlowe, Christopher, "Christopher Marlowe The Complete Plays" (1999), Everyman
  12. Normand, Lawrence, "Christopher Marlowe and English Renaissance Culture", pp.172~197 (1996), Ashgate
  13. Preedy, Chloe Kathleen, "Marlowe's Literary Scepticism Politic Religion and Post-Reformation Polemic" (2012), Bloomsbury
  14. Rutter, Tom, "The Cambridge Introduction to Christopher Marlowe" (2012), Cambridge UP
  15. Simkin, Stevie, "Marlowe Preface Books" (2000), Longman
  16. White, Paul Whitfield, "The Cambridge Companion to Christopher Marlowe", pp.70~89 (2004), Cambridge UP

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)