A Vindication of the Rights of the Racial Other: Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay re-reads Mary Shelley's Frankenstein as a “vindication of the rights of the racial other,” echoing the wellknown book A Vindication of the Rights of Woman written by her mother Mary Wollstonecraft. Transcending the criticisms reading Shelley's novel as a highly racist work, this essay aims to grasp in Shelley's text some revolutionary moments to vindicate the racial other's rights as equal human beings. In this reading against the grain, the Creature resists the unfair stereotypes stigmatizing racial others and upends such racial discourses themselves through his articulate voice. In fact, the text Frankenstein can be read in the context of colonialism. Victor Frankenstein and Henry Clerval represent England as a colonizer. Victor's scientific endeavor along with Henry Clerval's ambitious desire to join the East India Company and expend his energy in the pursuit of imperialist concerns reflects colonialist aspects of England in the late 18th and early 19th century. While Victor and Henry represent the imperial penetration into the East, the Creature plays the role as the racial other, who is colonized by such an penetration. The existence of the Creature can be interpreted as a kind of symptom of the uncomfortable feelings of the whites toward racial others in general rejected from the European culture. It is highly revolutionary of Shelley to give a voice to the Creature for his own part of storytelling. She brings to the surface the voice of the usually muted Other. The Creature's life story reveals the important fact that the monster is not inborn but constructed by the social system. The monster does not come from without, but is constructed from within an exclusive society defining the Other as a threat while the Other only desires to belong to the society the Other is born or brought into. Considering the fact those corpses that provide their parts to the Creature are in effect Europeans, the Creature comes from nothing but Europeans. The novel seems to make this point quite clear by making Frankenstein and his Creature indistinguishable.
Abstract
This essay re-reads Mary Shelley's Frankenstein as a “vindication of the rights of the racial other,” echoing the wellknown book A Vindication of the Rights of Woman written by her mother Mary Wollstonecraft. Transcending the criticisms reading Shelley's novel as a highly racist work, this essay aims to grasp in Shelley's text some revolutionary moments to vindicate the racial other's rights as equal human beings. In this reading against the grain, the Creature resists the unfair stereotypes stigmatizing racial others and upends such racial discourses themselves through his articulate voice. In fact, the text Frankenstein can be read in the context of colonialism. Victor Frankenstein and Henry Clerval represent England as a colonizer. Victor's scientific endeavor along with Henry Clerval's ambitious desire to join the East India Company and expend his energy in the pursuit of imperialist concerns reflects colonialist aspects of England in the late 18th and early 19th century. While Victor and Henry represent the imperial penetration into the East, the Creature plays the role as the racial other, who is colonized by such an penetration. The existence of the Creature can be interpreted as a kind of symptom of the uncomfortable feelings of the whites toward racial others in general rejected from the European culture. It is highly revolutionary of Shelley to give a voice to the Creature for his own part of storytelling. She brings to the surface the voice of the usually muted Other. The Creature's life story reveals the important fact that the monster is not inborn but constructed by the social system. The monster does not come from without, but is constructed from within an exclusive society defining the Other as a threat while the Other only desires to belong to the society the Other is born or brought into. Considering the fact those corpses that provide their parts to the Creature are in effect Europeans, the Creature comes from nothing but Europeans. The novel seems to make this point quite clear by making Frankenstein and his Creature indistinguishable.
참고문헌 (13)
- Baldick, Chris, "In Frankenstein's Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth- Century Writing" (1987), Clarendon Press
- Horrison, Mark, "Science and British Empire", Chicago Journals, 96, pp.56~63 (2005)
- 김경숙, "포도주, 광기 그리고 나쁜 피 —『제인 에어』속 제국주의 다시 읽기", 영어영문학, 57(2), pp.339~365 (2011), 한국영어영문학회
- Lew, Joseph W., "The Deceptive Other: Mary Shelley's Critique of Orientalism in Frankenstein", Studies in Romanticism, 30, pp.255~283 (1991)
- Malchow, Harold, "Frankenstein's Monster and Images of Race in Nineteenth- Century Britain", Past and Present, 139, pp.90~130 (1993)
- Mellor, Anne K., "Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters" (1988), Methuen and Routledge
- Mellor, Anne K., "Frankenstein, Racial Science, and the Yellow Peril", Nineteenth-Century Contexts, 23, pp.1~28 (2001)
- Piper, Karen, "Inuit Diasporas: Frankenstein and the Inuit in England", Romanticism, 13, pp.63~75 (2007)
- Rieder, John, "Embracing the Alien: Science Fiction in Mass Culture", Science-Fiction Studies, 9, pp.26~37 (1982)
- Shelley, Mary, "Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus, In The 1818 Text" (1994), Oxford UP
- Shelley, Mary, "Frankenstein, In The 1831 Text" (1992), St. Martin's Press
- Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, "Three Women's Texts and a Critique of Imperialism", Critical Inquiry, 12, pp.243~261 (1985)
- Vlasopolos, Anca, "Frankenstein's Hidden Skeleton: The Pscycho-Politics of Oppression", Science-Fiction Studies, 10, pp.125~136 (1983)