대학 영어수업에서 거꾸로 학습(Flipped Learning) 적용 사례 - 실패내성과 선호도 중심으로
A Case Study of Flipped Learning at College English: Focused on Failure Tolerance and Preference
0
조회
0
다운로드
41
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to examine the students' preference and failure tolerance applying the flipped learning to English class. To achieve this goal, the flipped class was designed considering educational prerequisites and analyses drawn from literature reviews and case studies. 10 students majoring in English participated in the research for 8 weeks. For the first 4 weeks, teacher-oriented class was performed. For the other 4 weeks, flipped learning was implemented. Before the research, academic failure tolerance scale was measured. After the 8th class, academic failure tolerance scale was investigated again. Furthermore, qualitative data were explored in order to have a better understanding of the students' preference and awareness of the flipped learning. The results of this study are that first, the mean score of failure tolerance showed a significant difference between before and after the flipped learning. Among the 3 subcategories, behavior scale and emotion scale have a significant difference. Secondly, 7 of the 10 students chose the flipped learning for the next semester, the other 3 students want to have a class mixed a teacher-oriented class with collaborative learning and want to have a teacher-oriented class instead of on-line lecture. The students stated that the good points of the flipped learning are voluntary involvement and interaction and bad points are burden on pre-study and free-riding of students who are not prepared for the class. For the further study, the flipped learning should be applied to other classes which students have low failure tolerance. Considering that failure tolerance scale has an effect on expecting better academic achievement, flipped learning can lead an improvement of academic achievement on subjects students have low failure tolerance. The results of this study implicate that applying flipped learning to a subject which students have low failure tolerance can raise failure tolerance changing negative experience to positive.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the students' preference and failure tolerance applying the flipped learning to English class. To achieve this goal, the flipped class was designed considering educational prerequisites and analyses drawn from literature reviews and case studies. 10 students majoring in English participated in the research for 8 weeks. For the first 4 weeks, teacher-oriented class was performed. For the other 4 weeks, flipped learning was implemented. Before the research, academic failure tolerance scale was measured. After the 8th class, academic failure tolerance scale was investigated again. Furthermore, qualitative data were explored in order to have a better understanding of the students' preference and awareness of the flipped learning. The results of this study are that first, the mean score of failure tolerance showed a significant difference between before and after the flipped learning. Among the 3 subcategories, behavior scale and emotion scale have a significant difference. Secondly, 7 of the 10 students chose the flipped learning for the next semester, the other 3 students want to have a class mixed a teacher-oriented class with collaborative learning and want to have a teacher-oriented class instead of on-line lecture. The students stated that the good points of the flipped learning are voluntary involvement and interaction and bad points are burden on pre-study and free-riding of students who are not prepared for the class. For the further study, the flipped learning should be applied to other classes which students have low failure tolerance. Considering that failure tolerance scale has an effect on expecting better academic achievement, flipped learning can lead an improvement of academic achievement on subjects students have low failure tolerance. The results of this study implicate that applying flipped learning to a subject which students have low failure tolerance can raise failure tolerance changing negative experience to positive.
참고문헌 (33)
- 길형석, "학습자중심교육에서의 교수원리 연구", 학습자중심 교과교육연구, 1(2), pp.1~30 (2001)
- 김아영, "한국형 학구적 실패에 대한 내성척도 개발에 관한 연구", 교육학 연구, 32(3), pp.59~75 (1994)
- 김아영, "학구적 실패에 대한 내성의 관련변인 연구", 교육심리연구, 11(2), pp.1~19 (1997)
- 김남익, "대학에서의 거꾸로 학습(Flipped learning) 사례 설계 및 효과성 연구: 학습동기와 자아효능감을 중심으로", 교육공학연구, 30(3), pp.467~492 (2014), 한국교육공학회
- 김백희, "플립드 러닝(Flipped Learning)을 기반으로 한역할 교체식 토의 수업 방안 연구", 우리말연구, (37), pp.141~166 (2014), 우리말학회
- 김보경, "교직수업을 위한 역진행 수업모형 개발", 교육종합연구, 12(2), pp.25~56 (2014), 교육종합연구소
- 박태정, "거꾸로 교실(Flipped Classroom)의 교육적 활용가능성 탐색을 위한 교사 인식 조사", 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 18(1), pp.81~97 (2015), 한국컴퓨터교육학회
- 신정숙, "발표·토론 동영상을 활용한 ‘거꾸로’ 교수법의 교육 효과 사례 분석 ― 조선대학교 <사고와 표현1> 수강 학생을 중심으로", 교양교육연구, 8(3), pp.133~163 (2014), 한국교양교육학회
- 엄우용, "플립드 클래스룸이란 무엇인가?", 서울과학교육, 12, pp.28~31 (2014)
- 이동엽, "플립드 러닝(Flipped Learning) 교수학습 설계모형 탐구", 디지털융복합연구, 11(12), pp.83~92 (2013), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
- 이민경, "거꾸로 교실(Flipped classroom)의 교실사회학적 의미 분석: 참여 교사들의 경험을 중심으로", 교육사회학연구, 24(2), pp.181~207 (2014), 한국교육사회학회
- 이정표, "교육적 소통을 통한 학습자 중심 수업의 본질 논의", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 12(4), pp.643~661 (2012), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 이종연, "Flipped learning의 의의 및 교육환경에 관한 탐색적 연구", 디지털융복합연구, 12(9), pp.313~323 (2014), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
- 이지연, "학습자 중심 플립드러닝(Flipped Learning) 수업의 적용 사례", 교육공학연구, 30(2), pp.163~191 (2014), 한국교육공학회
- 임진혁, "e-Education을 통한 대학교육 혁신", 정보과학회지, 30(5), pp.48~55 (2012)
- 정 민, "Flipped Classroom 학습이 초등학생의 수학과 학업성취도와 태도에 미치는 영향", 석사, 교육공학전공, pp.2014
- 주지은, "학습자의 동기적 특성과 학업 성취간의 관계 : 학습된 무기력과 실패내성을 중심으로", 석사, 교육심리, pp.1999
- 한형종, "대학 역전학습 온·오프라인 연계 설계전략에 관한 연구", 교육공학연구, 31(1), pp.1~38 (2015), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
- Ash, K., "Educators evaluate ‘Flipped Classrooms' : Benefits and drawbacks seen in replacing lectures with on-demand video", Education week, 32(2), pp.6~8 (2012)
- Bishop, J. L., "The flipped Classroom: A survey of the Research", proceeding of the ASEE National Conference, pp.33~43 (2013)
- Bergmann, J., "Flip your classroom : Research every student in every class every day" (2012), ISTE
- Berrett, D., "How ‘flipping' the classroom can improve the traditional lecture", The Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(25), pp.16~18 (2012)
- Butt, A., "Students views on the use of a flipped classroom approach : Evidence from Australia", Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), pp.33~43 (2014)
- Clifford, M., "Thoughts on a theory of constructive failure", Educational Psychologist, 19(2), pp.108~120 (1984)
- Davies, R. S., "Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course", Educational Technology Research & Development, 61, pp.563~583 (2013)
- Enfield, J., "Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN", TechTrends, 5(6), pp.14~27 (2013)
- Frydenberg, M., "Flipped excel", Information Systems Education Journal, 11(1), pp.63~73 (2013)
- Fulton, K. P., "10 Reasons to flip", New Styles of Instruction, 94(2), pp.20~24 (2012)
- "A review of flipped learning" (2013)[URL]
- Herreid, C. F., "Case studies and the flipped classroom", Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), pp.62~66 (2013)
- Gannod, G., "Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering", proceedings of the 30th international conferences on Software engineering, pp.777~786 (2008), ACM
- "Flipped learning: A response to five common criticisms" (2012)[URL]
- Strayer, J. F., "How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation, and task orientation", Learning Environment Research, 15, pp.171~193 (2012)