본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Examining Inequality in Housing Allocation and Housing Affordability: Evidence from Seoul in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article proposes that an equality of opportunity to dwell in affordable housing is a key factor for housing welfare in our society. It looks at whether or not inequality of housing allocation is as serious as inequality of income and it examines housing affordability within each income group. Also, the paper proposes a methodological development which uses the logic of income equality measurement, the 10th decile over 1st decile ratio, inorder to estimate inequality of housing allocation. It applies the ratio system rearranged by 5th decile in housing price and income and uses natural logarithms on both sides for the purpose of explaining the main impact bracket of the inequality. The first finding is that the inequality of housing allocation is as serious as the inequality of household income in Seoul, but the main cause bracket of the inequality in income is a contrast to that of housing allocation. The inequality in income spans a wide range below 5th deciles and that in housing price is due to an excessive gap above 5th deciles. The second finding is that Seoul has a partial disequilibrium problem between supply and demand, what households can actually afford is mismatched with affordable housing stocks. The third finding is that affordability in both the highest and lowest income brackets is poor, because both are twice the PIR threshold (five times) of UN-HABITAT. The final finding is that there is a polarization in housing types. Higher-income households live in apartments, whereas lower-income households live in “Dagagu” and “Dasyedae”, which are small low-priced housing units. Furthermore, the quickening pace of reconstruction projects in Seoul has increased the demolition of relatively low-cost dwellings, thus depriving many of the opportunity to reside in affordable housing.

Abstract

This article proposes that an equality of opportunity to dwell in affordable housing is a key factor for housing welfare in our society. It looks at whether or not inequality of housing allocation is as serious as inequality of income and it examines housing affordability within each income group. Also, the paper proposes a methodological development which uses the logic of income equality measurement, the 10th decile over 1st decile ratio, inorder to estimate inequality of housing allocation. It applies the ratio system rearranged by 5th decile in housing price and income and uses natural logarithms on both sides for the purpose of explaining the main impact bracket of the inequality. The first finding is that the inequality of housing allocation is as serious as the inequality of household income in Seoul, but the main cause bracket of the inequality in income is a contrast to that of housing allocation. The inequality in income spans a wide range below 5th deciles and that in housing price is due to an excessive gap above 5th deciles. The second finding is that Seoul has a partial disequilibrium problem between supply and demand, what households can actually afford is mismatched with affordable housing stocks. The third finding is that affordability in both the highest and lowest income brackets is poor, because both are twice the PIR threshold (five times) of UN-HABITAT. The final finding is that there is a polarization in housing types. Higher-income households live in apartments, whereas lower-income households live in “Dagagu” and “Dasyedae”, which are small low-priced housing units. Furthermore, the quickening pace of reconstruction projects in Seoul has increased the demolition of relatively low-cost dwellings, thus depriving many of the opportunity to reside in affordable housing.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. New Approaches to Expanding the Supply of Affordable Housing in Australia:An Increasing Role for the Private Sector, "Berry,M", AHURI, ~ (2002)
  2. BERL, "Affordable Housing in the Auckland Region:issues,mechanisms and strategies", BERL produced for the Auckland Regional Growth Forum (1999)
  3. Carmichael. K, "Affordable housing provision by legal agreement:a study of their use in Scotland", Aberdeen Papers in Land Economy, 99~94 (1999)
  4. DTZ New Zealand, "Housing costs and affordability in New Zealand,Wellington", Center for Housing Research Aotearoa New Zealand-Kainga Tipu, ~ (2004)
  5. Gallent N, "Planning for Affordable Rural Housing in England and Wales", Housing Studies, 12(1), pp.127~138 (1997)
  6. Housing New Zealand Corporation, "Building the Future", A Discussion Document Housing New Zealand Corporation Wellington (2004)
  7. Ji, Kyu-Hyun, "Housing affordability index in Korea", The Housing and Urban Affairs Review, 38, pp.37~53 (2006)
  8. Katz B, "Rethinking Local Affordable Housing Strategies: Lessons from 70 Years of Policy and Practice", Discussion paper for the Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy and the Urban Institute Washington DC (2003)
  9. Lee, Jin-Kyung, "Measuring Inequality of Housing Allocation and Housing Afordability in Seoul", The 2009 AsRES-AREUEA Joint International Conference (2009)
  10. 이진경, "가구소득대비 부담가능주택 특성분석 - 서울시 5대 권역, 주택 유형, 주택 노후도를 중심으로", 국토계획, 44(7), pp.97~108 (2009), 대한국토·도시계획학회
  11. Lee, Jin-Kyung, "Diminishment index for considering concurrently project's feasibility and financial structure", JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-ASCE, 130(3), pp.163~165 (2004), ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
  12. The Role of Local Government in the provision of Affordable Housing, In A report prepared for Local Government New Zealand, Dunedin, Wellington and North Shore City Councils and New Plymouth and Western Bay of Plenty District Councils, "McKinlay Douglas Ltd.", ~ (2004)
  13. Nelson AC, "Let's Get Efficient About Affordability", Housing Facts and Findings, 5(1) (2003), Fanniemae Foundation
  14. Oh,Dong-Hoon, "Affordable housing index for comparing within-regions", Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association, 13, pp.77~96 (2001)
  15. Regional Growth Forum, "Auckland Regional Affordable Housing Strategy", Auckland Regional Growth Forum March 2003 Auckland (2003)
  16. Sen,A.K, "Inequality Reexamined" (1995), Harvard University Press
  17. Sen,A.K, "On Economic Inequality" (1973), Clarendon Press
  18. 신상영, "주택자금 대출규제가 주택구입능력에 미치는 영향: 서울시 아파트를 중심으로", 국토연구, 54, pp.139~155 (2007), 국토연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)