본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

강우자료의 공간해상도에 따른 모의 유출특성 민감도 고찰

A Sensitivity of Simulated Runoff Characteristics on the Different Spatial Resolutions of Precipitation Data

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

Rainfall data is one of the most important data in hydrologic modeling. In this study, the impacts of spatial resolution of precipitation data onhydrological responses were assessed using SWAT in the Santa Fe River Basin, Florida. High correlations were found between the FAWN and NLDASrainfall data, which are observed weather data and simulated weather data based on observed data, respectively. FAWN-based scenarios had highermaximum rainfall and more rainfall days and events compared to NLDAS-based scenarios. Downstream areas showed lower correlations between rainfalland peak discharge than upstream areas due to the characteristics of study site. All scenarios did not show significant differences in base flow, andshowed less than 5% of differences in high flows among NLDAS-based scenarios. The impact of resolution will appear differently depending on thecharacteristics of the watershed and topography and the applied model, and thus, is a process that must be considered in advance in runoff simulationresearch. The study suggests that applying the research method to watersheds in Korea may yield more pronounced results, and highlights theimportance of considering data resolution in hydrologic modeling.

Abstract

Rainfall data is one of the most important data in hydrologic modeling. In this study, the impacts of spatial resolution of precipitation data onhydrological responses were assessed using SWAT in the Santa Fe River Basin, Florida. High correlations were found between the FAWN and NLDASrainfall data, which are observed weather data and simulated weather data based on observed data, respectively. FAWN-based scenarios had highermaximum rainfall and more rainfall days and events compared to NLDAS-based scenarios. Downstream areas showed lower correlations between rainfalland peak discharge than upstream areas due to the characteristics of study site. All scenarios did not show significant differences in base flow, andshowed less than 5% of differences in high flows among NLDAS-based scenarios. The impact of resolution will appear differently depending on thecharacteristics of the watershed and topography and the applied model, and thus, is a process that must be considered in advance in runoff simulationresearch. The study suggests that applying the research method to watersheds in Korea may yield more pronounced results, and highlights theimportance of considering data resolution in hydrologic modeling.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 안상진, "ModClark 모형을 이용한 유출 해석", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 38(3), pp.245~257 (2005), 한국수자원학회
  2. Arnold, J. G., "SWAT : Model use, calibration, and validation", Transactions of the ASABE, 55(4), pp.1491~1508 (2012)[DOI]
  3. Arnold, J. G., "Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I : Model development", Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34(1), pp.73~89 (1998)[DOI]
  4. Beven, K., "Encyclopedia of Hydrology and Water Resources", pp.486~489 (1998), Springer
  5. Buytaert, W., "Spatial and temporal rainfall variability in mountainous areas: A case study from the south Ecuadorian Andes", Journal of Hydrology, 329(3-4), pp.413~421 (2006)
  6. Das, T., "Comparison of conceptual model performance using different representations of spatial variability", Journal of Hydrology, 356(1-2), pp.106~118 (2008)
  7. Fu, S., "Impact of precipitation spatial resolution on the hydrological response of an integrated distributed water resources model", Vadose Zone Journal, 10(1), pp.25~36 (2011)[DOI]
  8. Huang, Y., "Sensitivity of hydrological models to temporal and spatial resolutions of rainfall data", Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 23(6), pp.2647~2663 (2019)[DOI]
  9. 정충길, "분포형 강우-유출 모형의 입력자료 해상도에 따른 유출변동 연구", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 47(9), pp.767~776 (2014), 한국수자원학회
  10. CREAMS: a field scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems, "Knisel, W. G.", United States Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration, ~, pp.Conservation Research Report 26 (1980)
  11. Leonard, R. A., "GLEAMS: Groundwater Loading Effects on Agricultural Management Systems", Transactions of the ASAE, 30(5), pp.1403~1428 (1987)[DOI]
  12. Liang, X., "Assessment of the effects of spatial resolutions on daily water fluxes simulations", Journal of Hydrology, 298(1-4), pp.287~310 (2004)
  13. Ly, S., "Diffe rent me thods for spatial interpolation of rainfall data for operational hydrology and hydrological modeling at watershed scale : a review, Biotechnologie, Agronomie", Société et Environnement, 17(2), pp.392~406 (2013)
  14. Mitchell, K. E., "The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system", Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109(D7), pp.1029~ (2004)[DOI]
  15. Moriasi, D. N., "Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations", Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), pp.885~900 (2007)[DOI]
  16. Muche, M. E., "Comparison and evaluation of gridded precipitation datasets in a Kansas agricultural watershed using SWAT", Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(3), pp.486~506 (2020)[DOI]
  17. Obled, C., "The sensitivity of hydrological models to spatial rainfall patterns : an evaluation using observed data", Journal of Hydrology, 159, pp.305~333 (1994)[DOI]
  18. Rath, S., "Agricultural water security through sustainable use of the Floridan aquifer: An integrated study of water quantity and water quality impacts", pp.2021
  19. Ruiz-Gibert, J. M., "Using an integrated hydrological model to estimate the impacts of droughts in a semiarid transboundary river basin : the case of study of the Tijuana River Basin", International Journal of River Basin Management, 18(4), pp.445~460 (2020)[DOI]
  20. Vischel, T., "Assessing the water balance in the Sahel: Impact of small scale rainfall variability on runoff. Part 2: Idealized modeling of runoff sensitivity", Journal of Hydrology, 333(2-4), pp.340~355 (2007)[DOI]
  21. Williams, J. R., "History of model development at Temple, Texas", Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53(5), pp.948~960 (2008)[DOI]
  22. Williams, J. R., "EPIC : a new model for assessing erosion’s effect on soil productivity", Journal of Soil and water Conservation, 38(5), pp.381~383 (1984)
  23. Xia, Y., "Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products", Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117(D3), pp.1029~ (2012)[DOI]
  24. Xu, H., "Assessing the influence of rain gauge density and distribution on hydrological model performance in a humid region of China", Journal of Hydrology, 505, pp.1~12 (2013)[DOI]
  25. 윤용남, "공간 분포된 강우를 사용한 유출 매개변수 추정 및 강우오차가 유출계산에 미치는 영향분석", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 35(1), pp.1~12 (2002), 한국수자원학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)