Changes in the Accommodation-convergence Relationship after the Artisan Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation for Myopic Patients
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate the change of accommodation-convergence parameters after implantation of Artisanphakic intraocular lens (PIOL). Methods: Prospective study for the patients with the Artisan PIOL implantation was performed. A total of 37patients (3 males and 34 females) enrolled the study. Preoperatively, convergence amplitude, the stimulus accommodativeconvergence per unit of accommodation (AC/A) ratio and the near point of convergence (NPC)were evaluated. After the Artisan PIOL implantation, the identical evaluations were repeated at 1 week, 1, 3,and 6 months after the surgery. Results: Mean age was 24.3 ± 4.8 years old, and preoperative refractive error was -8.92 ± 4.13 diopters (D). After the implantation, mean refractive errors significantly decreased to within ±1.00 D, and noticeable complicationswere not found. The convergence amplitude and the stimulus AC/A ratio increased 1 month after thesurgery, but progressively stabilized afterward to near preoperative values. NPC didn’t show any significantchange over follow-up period up to 6 months. Conclusions: These results regarding implantation of the Artisan PIOL revealed the increase of accommodation-convergence relationship within first 1 month after the surgery, but progressive stabilization was notedduring follow-up periods.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the change of accommodation-convergence parameters after implantation of Artisanphakic intraocular lens (PIOL). Methods: Prospective study for the patients with the Artisan PIOL implantation was performed. A total of 37patients (3 males and 34 females) enrolled the study. Preoperatively, convergence amplitude, the stimulus accommodativeconvergence per unit of accommodation (AC/A) ratio and the near point of convergence (NPC)were evaluated. After the Artisan PIOL implantation, the identical evaluations were repeated at 1 week, 1, 3,and 6 months after the surgery. Results: Mean age was 24.3 ± 4.8 years old, and preoperative refractive error was -8.92 ± 4.13 diopters (D). After the implantation, mean refractive errors significantly decreased to within ±1.00 D, and noticeable complicationswere not found. The convergence amplitude and the stimulus AC/A ratio increased 1 month after thesurgery, but progressively stabilized afterward to near preoperative values. NPC didn’t show any significantchange over follow-up period up to 6 months. Conclusions: These results regarding implantation of the Artisan PIOL revealed the increase of accommodation-convergence relationship within first 1 month after the surgery, but progressive stabilization was notedduring follow-up periods.
참고문헌 (16)
- Sutton GL, "Laser in situ keratomileusis in 2010: a review", Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 38, pp.192~210 (2010)
- Benedetti S, "Correction of myopia of 7 to 24 diopters with the Artisan phakic intraocular lens: two-year follow-up", J Refract Surg, 21, pp.116~126 (2005)
- Tahzib NG, "Long-term study of Artisan phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of moderate to high myopia: ten-year follow-up results", Ophthalmology, 114, pp.1133~1142 (2007)
- Prakash G, "Change in the accommodative convergence per unit of accommodation ratio after bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia in orthotropic patients: prospective evaluation", J Cataract Refract Surg, 33, pp.2054~2056 (2007)
- Von Noorden GK, "Binocular vision and ocular motility: theory and management of strabismus", pp.89~98 (2002), Mosby
- Maples WC, "Near point of convergence norms measured in elementary school children", Optom Vis Sci, 84, pp.224~228 (2007)
- Scheiman M, "Nearpoint of convergence: test procedure, target selection, and normative data", Optom Vis Sci, 80, pp.214~225 (2003)
- Wu XY, "Analysis of AC", A ratio after myopic excimer laser in situ keratomileusis, 2003, pp.39, 132~135
- Manas L, "The inconstancy of the ACA ratio", Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom, 32, pp.304~315 (1955)
- Rosenfield M, "Effect of a near-vision task on the response AC", A of a myopic population, 1987, pp.7, 225~233
- Gwiazda J, "Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur", Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 34, pp.690~694 (1993)
- Gwiazda J, "A dynamic relationship between myopia and blur-driven accommodation in school-aged children", Vision Res, 35, pp.1299~1304 (1995)
- Goss DA, "Clinical accommodation and heterophoria findings preceding juvenile onset of myopia", Optom Vis Sci, 68, pp.110~116 (1991)
- Drobe B, "The pre-myopic syndrome", Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 15, pp.375~378 (1995)
- Robertson DM, "Influence of contact lenses on accommodation. Theoretic considerations and clinical study", Am J Ophthalmol, 64, pp.860~871 (1967)
- Jimenez R, "Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?", Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 249, pp.925~935 (2011)