Comparison of the Refractive Measurements with Hand-held Autorefractometer, Table-mounted Autorefractometer and Cycloplegic Retinoscopy in Children
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the hand-held and table-top autorefractokeratometer in measuring refractive errors by comparing them with cycloplegic retinoscopy. Methods: Included in the study were 112 eyes of 112 pediatric patients whose mean age was 6.78 ± 2.61 years (range, 2 to 12 years). The refractive errors of all the eyes were measured with and without cycloplegia using a hand held autorefractokeratometer (Retinomax K-plus 3), table top autorefractokeratometer (Canon RK-F1) and performing cycloplegic retinoscopy. The spherical equivalent, cylindrical axis and keratometer values were statistically compared. Results: The mean spherical equivalent obtained from the Retinomax K-plus 3 was significantly less hyperopic than that of Canon RK-F1 (p = 0.004) before cycloplegia. When the Bland Altman analysis was performed in comparisons of spherical equivalent values measured with the Retinomax K-plus 3, Canon RK-F1 and cycloplegic retinoscopy, it was seen that almost all of the differences between the measurements remained within the range of ±2 standard deviation. Good agreement was found between Retinomax K-plus 3 and Canon RKF1 for the Jackson cross-cylinder values at axis 0° and 45°; keratometer values respectively. Conclusions: The refractive error components were highly correlated between the two instruments and cycloplegic retinoscopy.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the hand-held and table-top autorefractokeratometer in measuring refractive errors by comparing them with cycloplegic retinoscopy. Methods: Included in the study were 112 eyes of 112 pediatric patients whose mean age was 6.78 ± 2.61 years (range, 2 to 12 years). The refractive errors of all the eyes were measured with and without cycloplegia using a hand held autorefractokeratometer (Retinomax K-plus 3), table top autorefractokeratometer (Canon RK-F1) and performing cycloplegic retinoscopy. The spherical equivalent, cylindrical axis and keratometer values were statistically compared. Results: The mean spherical equivalent obtained from the Retinomax K-plus 3 was significantly less hyperopic than that of Canon RK-F1 (p = 0.004) before cycloplegia. When the Bland Altman analysis was performed in comparisons of spherical equivalent values measured with the Retinomax K-plus 3, Canon RK-F1 and cycloplegic retinoscopy, it was seen that almost all of the differences between the measurements remained within the range of ±2 standard deviation. Good agreement was found between Retinomax K-plus 3 and Canon RKF1 for the Jackson cross-cylinder values at axis 0° and 45°; keratometer values respectively. Conclusions: The refractive error components were highly correlated between the two instruments and cycloplegic retinoscopy.
참고문헌 (22)
- Tongue AC, "Refractive errors in children", Pediatr Clin North Am, 34, pp.1425~1437 (1987)
- Atkinson J, "Two infant vision screening programmes: prediction and prevention of strabismus and amblyopia from photo- and videorefractive screening", Eye (Lond), 10(2), pp.189~198 (1996)
- Lithander J, "Anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia in the age group 2 years and above: a prospective study of the results of treatment", Br J Ophthalmol, 75, pp.111~116 (1991)
- Schmidt P, "Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study", Ophthalmology, 111, pp.637~650 (2004)
- Williams C, "Screening for refractive errors with the Topcon PR2000 Pediatric Refractometer", Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 41, pp.1031~1037 (2000)
- Thibos LN, "Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error", Optom Vis Sci, 74, pp.367~375 (1997)
- Sunness JS, "Improvement of visual acuity by refraction in a low-vision population", Ophthalmology, 117, pp.1442~1446 (2010)
- Farook M, "Comparisons of the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor, and subjective refraction in Singapore adults", Optom Vis Sci, 82, pp.1066~1070 (2005)
- Vision in Preschoolers Study Group, "Preschool vision screening tests administered by nurse screeners compared with lay screeners in the vision in preschoolers study", Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 46, pp.2639~2648 (2005)
- Kallay OP, "Cycloplegic refractive errors in children: comparison of a standard and a hand-held refractor", Strabismus, 6, pp.3~7 (1998)
- Cordonnier M, "How accurate is the hand-held refractor Retinomax(R) in measuring cycloplegic refraction: a further evaluation", Strabismus, 6, pp.133~142 (1998)
- Wesemann W, "Accuracy and accommodation capability of a handheld autorefractor", J Cataract Refract Surg, 26, pp.62~70 (2000)
- Harvey EM, "Measurement of refractive error in Native American preschoolers: validity and reproducibility of autorefraction", Optom Vis Sci, 77, pp.140~149 (2000)
- Cordonnier M, "Screening for abnormal levels of hyperopia in children: a non-cycloplegic method with a hand held refractor", Br J Ophthalmol, 82, pp.1260~1264 (1998)
- Cordonnier M, "Non-cycloplegic screening for refractive errors in children with the hand-held autorefractor Retinomax: final results and comparison with non-cycloplegic photoscreening", Strabismus, 9, pp.59~70 (2001)
- Rotsos T, "A comparison of manifest refractions, cycloplegic refractions and retinoscopy on the RMA-3000 autorefractometer in children aged 3 to 15 years", Clin Ophthalmol, 3, pp.429~431 (2009)
- Harvey EM, "Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements with a hand held autorefractor in children", Br J Ophthalmol, 81, pp.941~948 (1997)
- Prabakaran S, "Cycloplegic refraction in preschool children: comparisons between the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor and retinoscopy", Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 29, pp.422~426 (2009)
- Choong YF, "A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children", Am J Ophthalmol, 142, pp.68~74 (2006)
- DeCarlo DK, "Trial frame refraction versus autorefraction among new patients in a low-vision clinic", Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 54, pp.19~24 (2013)
- Barry JC, "Non-cycloplegic screening for amblyopia via refractive findings with the Nikon Retinomax hand held autorefractor in 3 year old kindergarten children", Br J Ophthalmol, 85, pp.1179~1182 (2001)
- Wesemann W, "Experiences with the hand-held autorefractometer “Retinomax” in adults and children", Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 211, pp.387~394 (1997)