본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Trends in Utilization of Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients: A Nationwide Study Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Database

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류안과학

초록

Purpose: To analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients usingthe Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment data. Methods: Health claims for the years 2010 to 2019, as recorded via Korea’s Health Insurance Review and Assessment service,were accessed. We identified glaucoma patients using the glaucoma diagnostic codes H40 (glaucoma) and H42 (glaucomain other diseases classified elsewhere). For verification of the glaucoma diagnosis, information on any antiglaucoma medicationprescriptions and ocular surgery history also was obtained. Visual field testing data was isolated using procedural codesE6690 (kinetic perimetry) and E6691 (standard automated perimetry [SAP]) performed in tertiary hospitals. Any changes invisual field test utilization were identified using regression trend analysis. Results: From 2010 to 2019, the total number of SAP procedures performed in tertiary hospitals for either glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients increased gradually from 93,459 to 216,433. With regard to kinetic perimetry examinations, the totalnumber decreased gradually from 6,364 to 3,792. The yearly average SAP number per patient showed a slight increase, from1.168 to 1.248 (ß = 0.008, R2 = 0.669, p = 0.004). Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimeter examinationsper patient showed a significant decrease, from 1.093 to 0.940 (ß = -0.013, R2 = 0.580, p = 0.010). Conclusions: Between 2010 and 2019, the yearly average number of SAP procedures performed per glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patient increased in Korea. Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimetry examinations per patientsignificantly decreased.

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze 10-year trends in utilization of visual field tests for adult glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients usingthe Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment data. Methods: Health claims for the years 2010 to 2019, as recorded via Korea’s Health Insurance Review and Assessment service,were accessed. We identified glaucoma patients using the glaucoma diagnostic codes H40 (glaucoma) and H42 (glaucomain other diseases classified elsewhere). For verification of the glaucoma diagnosis, information on any antiglaucoma medicationprescriptions and ocular surgery history also was obtained. Visual field testing data was isolated using procedural codesE6690 (kinetic perimetry) and E6691 (standard automated perimetry [SAP]) performed in tertiary hospitals. Any changes invisual field test utilization were identified using regression trend analysis. Results: From 2010 to 2019, the total number of SAP procedures performed in tertiary hospitals for either glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patients increased gradually from 93,459 to 216,433. With regard to kinetic perimetry examinations, the totalnumber decreased gradually from 6,364 to 3,792. The yearly average SAP number per patient showed a slight increase, from1.168 to 1.248 (ß = 0.008, R2 = 0.669, p = 0.004). Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimeter examinationsper patient showed a significant decrease, from 1.093 to 0.940 (ß = -0.013, R2 = 0.580, p = 0.010). Conclusions: Between 2010 and 2019, the yearly average number of SAP procedures performed per glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect patient increased in Korea. Meanwhile, the yearly average number of kinetic perimetry examinations per patientsignificantly decreased.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Jonas JB, "Glaucoma", Lancet, 390, pp.2183~2193 (2017)
  2. Turalba AV, "A review of current technology used in evaluating visual function in glaucoma", Semin Ophthalmol, 25, pp.309~316 (2010)
  3. Gardiner SK, "Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression", Br J Ophthalmol, 86, pp.560~564 (2002)
  4. Blumberg DM, "Association between undetected 10-2 visual field damage and vision-related quality of life in patients with glaucoma", JAMA Ophthalmol, 135, pp.742~747 (2017)
  5. Ha A, "Optical Coherence Tomography for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma", Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology (2019), Asia Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology[DOI]
  6. Jampel HD, "Assessment of visual function in glaucoma : a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology", Ophthalmology, 118, pp.986~1002 (2011)
  7. Hood DC, "Improving our understanding, and detection, of glaucomatous damage: an approach based upon optical coherence tomography (OCT)", Prog Retin Eye Res, 57, pp.46~75 (2017)
  8. 김지애, "Towards Actualizing the Value Potential of Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) Data as a Resource for Health Research: Strengths, Limitations, Applications, and Strategies for Optimal Use of HIRA Data", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(5), pp.718~728 (2017), 대한의학회
  9. Park BJ, "Studying on diagnosis accuracy for health insurance claims data in Korea" (2003), Seoul National Univ
  10. Kivikunnas S, "Overview of process trend analysis methods and applications", ERUDIT Workshop on Applications in Pulp and Paper Industry, pp.395~408 (1998)
  11. 조정우, "녹내장 시야 지표의 임상적 유용성", 대한안과학회지, 51(1), pp.49~54 (2010), 대한안과학회
  12. "Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability", Ophthalmology, 101, pp.1445~1455 (1994)
  13. Swaminathan SS, "Visual field outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study", Ophthalmology, 127, pp.1162~1169 (2020)
  14. Musch DC, "Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors", Ophthalmology, 116, pp.200~207 (2009)
  15. Armaly MF, "Biostatistical analysis of the collaborative glaucoma study. I. Summary report of the risk factors for glaucomatous visual-field defects", Arch Ophthalmol, 98, pp.2163~2171 (1980)
  16. Wu Z, "Frequency of testing to detect visual field progression derived using a longitudinal cohort of glaucoma patients", Ophthalmology, 124, pp.786~792 (2017)
  17. Chauhan BC, "Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma", Br J Ophthalmol, 92, pp.569~573 (2008)
  18. 신진희, "험프리 정적시야계와 골드만 동적시야계의 비교:시야장애평가에서 험프리 정적시야계의 적용", 대한안과학회지, 54(12), pp.1907~1917 (2013), 대한안과학회
  19. Bengtsson B, "Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies", Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 77, pp.143~146 (1999)
  20. Bengtsson B, "in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma", Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 76, pp.268~272 (1998)
  21. Bengtsson B, "SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma", Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 76, pp.431~437 (1998)
  22. Tan N, "The effect of testing reliability on visual field sensitivity in normal eyes : the Singapore Chinese Eye Study", Ophthalmology, 125, pp.15~21 (2018)
  23. Birt CM, "Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population", Ophthalmology, 104, pp.1126~1130 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)