자살관여행위의 가벌성 근거
The Basis of Punishability for Suicide Participation
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The core of the problem of the crime of aiding and abetting suicide(§252②, Criminal Law) is a rational explanation for the basis of punishability for suicide participation and its commencement of the commission from premises that suicide participation is provided in the same article with murder upon request and homicide with consent and it has same statutory penalty. Although it is the predominant view that suicide participation is a separate principal offense type in spite of the act patterns of committing abetment and assist, actual profit of distinction suicide participation that is provided in the form of accomplice from murder upon request in the form of principal is not inconsiderable. Even though suicide participation is punishable enough by being prepared its special constituent requisite, the dependency of accomplice shall not be disregarded for the reasons of act of committing in the accomplice form of abetting and assist. In many cases, the legality theory of suicide or the legal free zone theory of suicide is supported by the independent crime theory of suicide, but we shall not regard disposal of life as legal conduct or evaluation-suspended conduct. Because the interest of respect for each individual's self-determination right should not accomplished in the matter of life disposal that means destruction of each individual. In the concern of life disposal, both of the right self-determination(autonomy) and life(existence) are violated in homicide, but only life(existence) is violated in the crimes of homicide with consent. Such difference between these two types of crime is the base of reduction illegality and punishment of homicide with consent and suicide participation against homicide. Suicide is illegal misconduct although it has committed on one's responsibility. Because blocking commitment of suicide is completely legal and adequate behavior without composing violence whether suicide is self-answerable or not.
Abstract
The core of the problem of the crime of aiding and abetting suicide(§252②, Criminal Law) is a rational explanation for the basis of punishability for suicide participation and its commencement of the commission from premises that suicide participation is provided in the same article with murder upon request and homicide with consent and it has same statutory penalty. Although it is the predominant view that suicide participation is a separate principal offense type in spite of the act patterns of committing abetment and assist, actual profit of distinction suicide participation that is provided in the form of accomplice from murder upon request in the form of principal is not inconsiderable. Even though suicide participation is punishable enough by being prepared its special constituent requisite, the dependency of accomplice shall not be disregarded for the reasons of act of committing in the accomplice form of abetting and assist. In many cases, the legality theory of suicide or the legal free zone theory of suicide is supported by the independent crime theory of suicide, but we shall not regard disposal of life as legal conduct or evaluation-suspended conduct. Because the interest of respect for each individual's self-determination right should not accomplished in the matter of life disposal that means destruction of each individual. In the concern of life disposal, both of the right self-determination(autonomy) and life(existence) are violated in homicide, but only life(existence) is violated in the crimes of homicide with consent. Such difference between these two types of crime is the base of reduction illegality and punishment of homicide with consent and suicide participation against homicide. Suicide is illegal misconduct although it has committed on one's responsibility. Because blocking commitment of suicide is completely legal and adequate behavior without composing violence whether suicide is self-answerable or not.
참고문헌 (45)
- 김일수, (1997), 박영사
- 김영환, "법철학의 근본문제" (2006), 홍문사
- 배종대, "형법각론(제6전정판)" (2003), 홍문사
- 김상호, "형법각론" (2004), 세종출판사
- 임웅, "형법각론(개정판보정)" (2005), 법문사
- 권오걸, "生命保護의 觀點에서 본 自殺 敎唆？幇助罪의 검토", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.421~440 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 성낙현, "자살관여행위의 가벌성에 관한 한국과 독일형법의 비교", 비교형사법연구, 6(2-1), pp.417~444 (2004), 한국비교형사법학회
- 전지연, "간접정범의 기본구조와 자살참가에서의 간접정범", 형사법연구, (6) (1993)
- 정성근, "살인죄와 자살관여죄의 한계", 고시연구, 97(3)
- 정창운, "자살의 죄책성", 법정 (1966)
- 大塚仁, (1992)
- 大塚仁, (1996)
- 曾根威彦, "刑法における正当化の理論" (1980), 成文堂
- 谷直之, "自殺関与罪に関する一考察", 同志社法學, 44(6) (1994)
- 福田雅章, "大阪地裁安楽死事件解題", 阪大法学, (108) (1978)
- 上田健二, "刑事法学の動き-秋葉論文に対する書評", 法律時報, 64(5) (1992)
- 上田健二, "自殺-違法か,適法か,それとも何か", 宮澤浩一先生古稀祝賀論文集, 2 (2000)
- 若尾岳志, "自殺関与罪の處罰根拠(一)", 早稻田大学大学院法硏論集, (94) (2000)
- 塩谷毅, "自殺関与事例における被害者自己答責性(二)", 立命館法学, (257) (1998)
- 林幹人, "自殺関与罪", 法学セミナー, (402) (1988)
- 秋葉悅子, "自殺関与罪に関する考察", 上智法学論集, 32(2) (1989)
- Feuerbach, "Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschland geltenden Peinlichen Rechts", ~ (1801)
- Stratenwerth, "Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil I, 3. Aufl" (1981)
- Arzt, "Die Delikte gegen das Leben", ZStW, 83 (1971)
- Bringewat, "Unbeachtlicher Selbsttötungswille und ernstliches Tötungsverlangenen Wilderspruch?, Suizid und Euthanasie" (1976)
- Bringewat, "Die Strafbarkeit der Beteiligung an fremder Selbsttötung als Grenzproblem der Strafrechtsdogmatik", ZStW, 87 (1975)
- Dölling, "Fahrlässige Tötung bei Selbstgefährdung des Opfers", ~ (1984)
- Engisch, "Die Strafwürdigkeit der Unfruchtbarmachung mit Einwilligung", FS-Mayer, ~ (1966)
- Galllas, "Strafbares Unterlassen im Fall einer Selbsttötung, Beitrage zur Verbrechenslehre", ~ (1968)
- Göbel, "Die Einwilligung im Strafrecht als Ausprägung des Selbstbestimmungsrechts", ~ (1992)
- Hirsch, "Einwilligung und Selbstbestimmung, FS-Welzel", ~ (1974)
- Hirsch, "Behandlungsabbruch und Sterbehilfe, FS-Lackner", ~ (1987)
- Jakobs, "Zum Unrecht der Selbsttötung und der Tötung auf Verlangen, FS-Kaufmann", ~ (1993)
- Keßler, "Einwilligung des Verleztenn" (1984)
- Marx, "Zur Definition des Begriffs. Rechtsgut", ~ (1972)
- Neumann, "Die Strafbarkeit der Suizidbeteiligung als Problem der Eigenverantwortlichkeit des „Opfers“", ~ (1987)
- Noll, "Übergesetzliche Rechtfertigungsgrunde im besondern die Einwilligung des Verletzten", ~ (1955)
- Noll, "Tatbestand und Rechtswidrigkeit: Die Wertabwäagung als Prinzip der Rechtfertugung", ZStW, 77 (1965)
- Otto, "Eigenverantwortliche Selbstschädigung und gefähedung sowie einverstandliche Fremdschädigung und -gefährdung", FS-Tröndle, ~ (1989)
- Schmidhäuser, "Selbstmord und Beteiligung am Selbstmord in strafrechtlicher Sicht, FS-Welzel", ~ (1974)
- Schroeder, "Beihilfe zum Selbstmord und Tötung auf Verlangen", ZStW, 106 (1994)
- Stratenwerth, "Prinzipien der Rechtfertigung", ZStW, 68 (1956)
- Tröndle, "Warum ist die Sterbehilfe ein rechtliches Problem?", ZStW, 99 (1987)
- Weigend, "Über die Begründung der Straflosigkeit bei Einwilligung des Betroffenen", ZStW, 98 (1986)
- Williams, "Glanville The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law" (1957)