한국 형법의 사회상규조항의 계보와 그 입법적 의의
The Pedigree of the 'normal social rules clause' of the Korean Criminal Code, and its Legislative Significance
0
조회
0
다운로드
24
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This treatise traces the pedigree of normal social rules clause of the Korean criminal Code and evaluates it's legislative significance. The following conclusion has been drawn:The normal social rules clause is not a product of Korean legislator’s independent decision. Instead, it was rather a concept of normal social rules concept employed by Makino who was the representative of the Japanese subjectivism criminal law theory, and his substantial illegality theory based on the normal social rules that Byungro Kim made use of. Makino’s substantial illegality theory was a radical premise which has its basis on the subjectivism theory of criminal law that attempts to retreat the liberty-assuring function of the principle of legality. This theory made the social evolutionary theory widespread in the 19th and early 20th century as its ideological foundation, and the Nazi criminal law also came out of the same chain of such theory. Since the legislative plan of the korean normal social rules clause has been taken a radical natural law-like or radical legal positivism-like methodology, it would be desirable to ultimately abolish this clause. However, even while the normal social rules clause is not being abolished and continues to exist, the details of the normal social rules concept should not be filled by morality nor ethic.
Abstract
This treatise traces the pedigree of normal social rules clause of the Korean criminal Code and evaluates it's legislative significance. The following conclusion has been drawn:The normal social rules clause is not a product of Korean legislator’s independent decision. Instead, it was rather a concept of normal social rules concept employed by Makino who was the representative of the Japanese subjectivism criminal law theory, and his substantial illegality theory based on the normal social rules that Byungro Kim made use of. Makino’s substantial illegality theory was a radical premise which has its basis on the subjectivism theory of criminal law that attempts to retreat the liberty-assuring function of the principle of legality. This theory made the social evolutionary theory widespread in the 19th and early 20th century as its ideological foundation, and the Nazi criminal law also came out of the same chain of such theory. Since the legislative plan of the korean normal social rules clause has been taken a radical natural law-like or radical legal positivism-like methodology, it would be desirable to ultimately abolish this clause. However, even while the normal social rules clause is not being abolished and continues to exist, the details of the normal social rules concept should not be filled by morality nor ethic.
참고문헌 (36)
- 강석구, "형법 제20조 정당행위에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 김병로, "범죄구성의 요건되는 위법성을 논함", 법학계, (3) (1915), 법학협회사무소
- 김봉수, "위법성조각사유의 체계 및 경합에 관한 연구", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.47~70 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
- 김성돈, "한국 형법의 사회상규조항의 기능과 형법학의 과제", 성균관법학, 24(4), pp.247~285 (2012), 법학연구소
- 김영환, "형법 제20조 정당행위에 관한 비판적 고찰, In 김종원교수화갑기념논문집" (1991)
- 박지현, "군사독재시대의 형법학의 자취-형법학의 정치학", 법학논총, 32(1), pp.257~276 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 배종대, "형법총론(제9개정판)" (2009), 홍문사
- 신동운, "형법제정자료집(Ⅰ)형법" (1990), 한국형사정책연구원
- 신동운, "형법 제20조 사회상규 규정의 성립경위", 서울대학교 법학, 47(2), pp.189~219 (2006), 법학연구소
- 신동운, "가인 김병로 선생의 범죄론체계와 한국형법의 총칙규정", 서울대학교 법학, 49(1), pp.1~26 (2008), 법학연구소
- 신동운, "가인 김병로 선생과 법전편찬 - 형법과 형사소송법을 중심으로 -, 전북대학교 개교 60주년 기념학술대회논문", 법학연구, (25) (2007), 전북대학교 사회과학연구소
- 양일모, "동아시아의 사회진화론 재고-중국과 한국의 ‘진화’ 개념의 형성", 한국학연구, (17) (2007)
- 윤상민, "가벌적 위법성론의 재음미", 법학연구, (32), pp.295~318 (2008), 한국법학회
- 이덕인, "형법민주화의 상징으로서 형법 제20조의 사회상규", 경남법학, (21) (2006), 경남대학교 법학연구소
- 이상용, "형법 제20조의 사회상규 규정의 입법연혁과 사회상규의 의미", 형사법연구, (20), pp.162~190 (2003), 한국형사법학회
- 이형국, "한국형법학에 있어서 위법성이론의 변천에 관한 고찰, In 동암 형법논문선(동암 이형국 교수 고희기념)" (2008), 삼우사
- 이형국, "형법상 위법성관련조문과 그 체계적 정비방안" (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- 전지연, "안락사에 대한 형법적 고찰", 한림법학 Forum, 4 (1995), 한림대학교 법학연구소
- 천진호, "사회상규에 위배되지 아니하는 행위에 대한 비판적 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 3(2) (2001), 한국비교형사법학회
- 허일태, "刑法 第20條의 “社會常規에 위배되지 아니하는 행위”의 재조명", 비교형사법연구, 4(1), pp.1~28 (2002), 한국비교형사법학회
- 김학준, "가인 김병로 평전" (1988), 민음사
- 박노자, "우승열패의 신화", 한겨레신문사, ~ (2006)
- 엄상섭, "암살범의 특질, In 효당 엄상섭 형사소소송법 논집"
- 오영근, "형법총론, 제2판" (2009), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법총론, 제7판" (2011)
- 임웅, "형법총론, 제4정판" (2012), 법문사
- Kühl, Kristian, "Strafrecht und Moral-Trennendes und Verbindes, In in: Festschrift fuer H.-L. Schreiber zum 70" (2003), Heidelberg
- Jose Luis Gonzalez Cussac, "Feindstrafrecht, In Rechtsgeschichte und Rechtsgeschehen" (2007)
- Franz von Liszt․Eberhard Schmidt, "Lehrbuch des Deutschen Strafrecht, 23. Aufl." (1921), Walter de Gruyter & Co.
- Mezger, Edmund, "Die materielle Rechtswidrigkeit im kommenden Strafrecht Ⅰ", ZStW (1936)
- Schaffstein, Fridrich, "Das Verbrechen eine Rechtsverletzung?, In in: Texte zur Strafrechtstheorie der Neuzeit, Band Ⅱ"
- Schaffstein, "Die materielle Rechtswidrigkeit im kommenden Strafrecht, Ⅱ", ZStW (1936)
- 中山硏一, "牧野英一(마키노 에이이치)의 刑法理論 (번역), 일본형법이론사의 종합적 연구" (2009), 동아대학교 출판부
- 牧野英一, "刑法總論(講義錄)", 早稻田大學校 出版部 藏版, ~ (1908)
- 牧野英一, "日本刑法" (1933), 有斐閣
- 牧野英一, "刑法總論" (1940), 日本評論社版