본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

미국에서의 배심원의 양형참여

Jury Sentencing in the United States

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

In Korea, the citizen's participation system in criminal trial has been enforced from January 2008. The system is mingled with the factors of jury system and the factors of mixed court system or Schöffengerichtsbarkeit, and the system's destiny will be decided after it's experimental operation for years. This paper aims to acquire some implications for the system's development in Korea by examining jury sentencing in the United States. Jury discretion to select sentences in felony cases was first adopted in the United States in 1796. Jury sentencing made its way westward from the Old Dominion as Virginia-trained lawyers and politicians moved to Kentucky and revised the criminal law of that state in 1798. Six states today still permit juries to fix sentences in felony cases. The Tennessee Legislature abolished mandatory capital punishment for first degree murder and inaugurated absolute capital sentencing discretion. The sentencing authority, whether judge or jury, was given unfettered discretion to choose between the penalty of death and life imprisonment. Jury sentencing in capital cases is practiced in all jurisdiction in the United States today. The main criticism of jury sentencing is disparity and unfairness of jury sentencing verdicts, compromise verdicts and high cost of jury sentencing. In this paper, Part Ⅱ surveys the history of jury sentencing to the present in the United States, Part Ⅲ examines the United States Supreme Court's decisions about jury sentencing, Part Ⅳ addresses the issues in the jury sentencing in the United States, and Part Ⅴ provides some implications for the system's development in Korea.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Morris B. Hoffman, "The Case for Jury Sentencing", 52 Duke L.J. 951, 998~999 (2003)
  2. Clay S. Conrad, "Jury Nullification : The Evolution of a Doctrine", pp.207~208 (1998), Carolina Academic Press
  3. Erik Lillquist, "The Puzzling Return of Jury Sentencing : Misgivings about Apprendi", 82 N.C. L. Rev. 621, 644~ (2004)
  4. H. M. LaFont, "Assessment of Punishment : A Judge or Jury Function?", 38 Tex. L. Rev. 835, 842~ (1960)
  5. Jeffrey Abramson, "We, The Jury : The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy", pp.217~ (2000), Harvard University Press
  6. Jenia Iontcheva, "Jury Sentencing as Democratic Practice", 89 Va. L. Rev. 311, 317~319 (2003)
  7. John W. Poulos, "Liability Rules, Sentencing Factors, and the Sixth Amendment Right to a Jury Trial : A Preliminary Inquiry", 44 U. Miami L. Rev, 643, pp.650~651 (1990)
  8. John W. Poulos, "The Supreme Court, Capital Punishment and the Substantive Criminal Law : the Rise and Fall of Mandatory Capital Punishment", 28 Ariz. L. Rev., 143, pp.147~148 (1986)
  9. "Murphy v. Commonwealth, 50 S.W.3d 173, 178 (Ky. 2001)", ~
  10. Nancy J. King, "The Origins of Felony Jury Sentencing in the United States", 78 Chi.-Kent L. Rev, 937, pp.937~ (2003)
  11. Nancy J. King, "Felony Jury Sentencing in Practice : A Three-State Study", 57 Vand. L. Rev., 885, pp.886~ (2004)
  12. Philip Pettit, "Deliberation and Decision : Economics, Constitutional Theory and Deliberative Democracy", 92~93 (2004)
  13. Richard C. Hanes, "Crime and Punishment in America : Almanac, Vol. 1", pp.29~ (2005), Thomson Gale
  14. Robert A. Weninger, "Jury Sentencing in Noncapital Cases : A Case Study of El Paso County", 45 Wash. U. J. Urb. & Contemp. L., 3, pp.27~28 (1994)
  15. Susan R. Klein, "The Return of Federal Judicial Discretion in Criminal Sentencing", 39 Val. U. L. Rev., 693, pp.696~697 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)