한글판 우울증 관해 질문지의 표준화 예비 연구
A Preliminary Study for the Standardization of Korean Version of the Remission from Depression Questionnaire (K-RDQ)
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective : Existing depression rating scales do not fully reflect depressed patients’ perspective of remission, which goes beyond symptom resolution. The Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ) captures a broader array of domains, and the present study examines the reliability and validity of the Korean Version of the RDQ (K-RDQ). Methods : The test-retest reliability of the K-RDQ was studied in 60 depressed patients and 30 normal subjects working at a university hospital. Subjects were evaluated at baseline and again 1-2 weeks later. The validity of the K-RDQ was studied in 200 depressed patients who were rated on the 17-item HDRS and the CGI-S ; each patient also completed the QIDS-SR, STAI-S, GHQ/QL-12, and SDS. Results : The K-RDQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.965 for the total scale and above 0.80 for each of the 7 subscales. The test-retest reliability of the total scale was 0.951. Mean K-RDQ scores (45.79±18.65) of the depressed patients were significantly higher than those (15.87±10.60) of the mentally healthy subjects (t=12.8, p＜0.001). Five factors from the K-RDQ were extracted by principal axis factoring with equimax rotation. Conclusion : These results indicate that the K-RDQ is a reliable and valid measure that evaluates multiple domains that depressed patients consider important in determining remission. Thus, the K-RDQ maybe considered an appropriate tool for use in the clinical setting.
Abstract
Objective : Existing depression rating scales do not fully reflect depressed patients’ perspective of remission, which goes beyond symptom resolution. The Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ) captures a broader array of domains, and the present study examines the reliability and validity of the Korean Version of the RDQ (K-RDQ). Methods : The test-retest reliability of the K-RDQ was studied in 60 depressed patients and 30 normal subjects working at a university hospital. Subjects were evaluated at baseline and again 1-2 weeks later. The validity of the K-RDQ was studied in 200 depressed patients who were rated on the 17-item HDRS and the CGI-S ; each patient also completed the QIDS-SR, STAI-S, GHQ/QL-12, and SDS. Results : The K-RDQ demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.965 for the total scale and above 0.80 for each of the 7 subscales. The test-retest reliability of the total scale was 0.951. Mean K-RDQ scores (45.79±18.65) of the depressed patients were significantly higher than those (15.87±10.60) of the mentally healthy subjects (t=12.8, p＜0.001). Five factors from the K-RDQ were extracted by principal axis factoring with equimax rotation. Conclusion : These results indicate that the K-RDQ is a reliable and valid measure that evaluates multiple domains that depressed patients consider important in determining remission. Thus, the K-RDQ maybe considered an appropriate tool for use in the clinical setting.
참고문헌 (36)
- American Psychiatric Association, "Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. revision", Am J Psychiatry, 157(4), pp.1~45 (2000)
- Anderson JE, "Depression in primary care: tools for screening, diagnosis, and measuring response to treatment", BCMJ, 44, pp.415~419 (2002)
- Thase ME., "Introduction: defining remission in patients treated with antidepressants", J Clin Psychiatry, 60(22), pp.3~6 (1999)
- Mueller TI, "Recurrence after recovery from major depressive disorder during 15 years of observational follow-up", Am J Psychiatry, 156, pp.1000~1006 (1999)
- Lopez AD, "Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001 : systematic analysis of population health data", Lancet, 367, pp.1747~1757 (2006)
- Fara M, "Pharmacological approaches to the treatment of residual symptoms", J Psychopharmacol, 20(3), pp.29~34 (2006)
- American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (2000), American Psychiatric Association
- Rush AJ, "Treating depression to remission", Psychiatr Ann, 25, pp.704~709 (1995)
- Simon GE, "Recognition, management, and outcomes of depression in primary care", Arch Fam Med, 4, pp.99~105 (1995)
- Judd LL, "Does incomplete recovery from first lifetime major depressive episode herald a chronic course of illness?", Am J Psychiatry, 157, pp.1501~1504 (2000)
- Weissman MM, "The efficacy of drugs and psychotherapy in the treatment of acute depressive episodes", Am J Psychiatry, 136, pp.555~558 (1979)
- Karp JF, "Relationship of variability in residual symptoms with recurrence of major depressive disorder during maintenance treatment", Am J Psychiatry, 161, pp.1877~1884 (2004)
- Zimmerman M, "How should remission from depression be defined? The depressed patient’s perspective", Am J Psychiatry, 163, pp.148~150 (2006)
- Zimmerman M, "An inadequate community standard of care : lack of measurement of outcome when treating depression in clinical practice", Primary Psychiatry, 15, pp.67~75 (2008)
- Zimmerman M, "Remission in depressed outpatients: more than just symptom resolution", J Psychiatr Res, 42, pp.797~801 (2008)
- Zimmerman M, "A new type of scale for determining remission from depression: the Remission from Depression Questionnaire", J Psychiatr Res, 47, pp.78~82 (2013)
- Zimmerman M, "Depressed patients’ perspectives of 2 measures of outcome: the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) and the Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ)", Ann Clin Psychiatry, 23, pp.208~212 (2011)
- Rush AJ, "The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression", Biol Psychiatry, 54, pp.573~583 (2003)
- 홍진표, "한국어판 자기보고형 간이우울증상평가척도(QIDS-SR)의 신뢰도 및 타당도", 우울조울병, 11(1), pp.44~50 (2013), 대한우울∙조울병학회
- Spielberger CD, "Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory" (1970), Consulting Psychologists Press
- Kim JT, "Relation between trait anxiety and socialization", pp.1978
- Lee YJ, "Study of relationship of stress, social support, self-esteem and depression and anxiety", pp.1995
- Goldberg DP, "A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire", Psychol Med, 9, pp.139~145 (1979)
- Kook SH, "A validation of GHQ", QL-12 to assess the quality of life in patients with schizophrenia, 2000, pp.19, 587~602
- Chang SJ, "Standardization of stress measurement scale", J Prev Med Public Health, pp.121~159 (1993)
- Sheehan DV, "The anxiety disease" (1983), Charles Scribner and Sons
- 박준영, "한국판 Sheehan Disability Scale의 신뢰도와 타당도 연구", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(1), pp.73~81 (2010), 한국임상심리학회
- Hamilton M, "A rating scale for depression", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 23, pp.56~62 (1960)
- 이중서, "한국판 Hamilton 우울증 평가 척도의 신뢰도, 타당도 연구", 신경정신의학, 44(4), pp.456~465 (2005), 대한신경정신의학회
- Haro JM, "The Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale: a simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia", Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl, 107, pp.16~23 (2003)
- Zimmerman M, "Personal communication", ~ (2014)
- Zheng YP, "Validity and reliability of the Chinese Hamilton Depression Rating Scale", Br J Psychiatry, 152, pp.660~664 (1988)
- Stahl M, "Textbook of psychopharmacology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders", pp.137~ (1997), Saunders
- Akistal HS, "Mood disorder: clinical features. In: Sadock VA: Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry", pp.1341~1347 (2000), Williams & Wilkins
- Ruegg RG, "Depression in aged", Psychiatr Clin North Am, 11, pp.83~ (1988)
- Lӧwe B, "Depression, anxiety and somatization in primary care : syndrome overlap and functional impairment", Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 30, pp.191~199 (2008)