본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

로봇의 어포던스 지각 과정 및 계층 분석법을 이용한 우선 순위 동작 결정

Affordance Perception And Behavior Planning Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper presents a new behavior planning scheme for autonomous robots, allowing them to handle various objects used in our daily lives. The key idea underlying the proposed scheme is to use affordance concepts that provide a robot with action possibilities triggered by a relation between the robot and objects around it. Specifically, the robot attempts to find the affordances and to determine the most adequate action among them. Through a series of the perception processes, robot motions can be planned and performed to complete assigned tasks. What is of particular importance from the practical point of view is a decision making capability to determine the best choice by comparing the human’s body characteristics and behavioral patterns as criteria with action possibilities as alternatives. For this, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique is employed to systematically evaluate the correlation between the criteria and the alternatives. Moreover, the alternatives arranged in order of priority through the decision making process enable the robot to have redundant solutions for the assigned task, resulting in flexible motion generation. The effectiveness and validity of the proposed scheme are verified by performing extensive simulations using objects of our daily use.

Abstract

This paper presents a new behavior planning scheme for autonomous robots, allowing them to handle various objects used in our daily lives. The key idea underlying the proposed scheme is to use affordance concepts that provide a robot with action possibilities triggered by a relation between the robot and objects around it. Specifically, the robot attempts to find the affordances and to determine the most adequate action among them. Through a series of the perception processes, robot motions can be planned and performed to complete assigned tasks. What is of particular importance from the practical point of view is a decision making capability to determine the best choice by comparing the human’s body characteristics and behavioral patterns as criteria with action possibilities as alternatives. For this, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique is employed to systematically evaluate the correlation between the criteria and the alternatives. Moreover, the alternatives arranged in order of priority through the decision making process enable the robot to have redundant solutions for the assigned task, resulting in flexible motion generation. The effectiveness and validity of the proposed scheme are verified by performing extensive simulations using objects of our daily use.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. A. Miller, "Automatic grasp planning using shape primitives", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp.1824~1829 (2003)
  2. M. Moussa, "Combining expert neural networks using reinforcement feedback for learning primitive grasping behavior", IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 15(3), pp.629~638 (2004)
  3. J. Aleotti, "Grasp recognition in virtual reality for robot pregrasp planning by demonstration", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp.2801~2806 (2006)
  4. M. Tenorth, "Web-enabled robots: robots that use the web as an information", IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 18(2), pp.58~68 (2011)
  5. E. Pacchierotti, "Design of an office-guide robot for socialinteraction studies", Proc. IEEE, 2006, 4965~4970
  6. C.C. Kemp, "Challenges for robot manipulation in humanenvironments", IEEE Robotics and AutomationMagazine, 14(1), pp.20~29 (2007)
  7. A. Wykowska, "How humans optimize their interaction with the environment: the impact of action context on human perception", Communications in Computer and Information Science, 44(2), pp.162~172 (2009)
  8. J.J. Gibson, "The ecological approach to visual perception" (1979), Houghton Mifflin
  9. J. Norman, "Ecological psychology and the two visual systems: not to worry", Ecological Psychology, 13(2), pp.135~145 (2001)
  10. S.-H. Hsiao, "An online affordance evaluation model for product design", Design Studies, 33(2), pp.126~159 (2011)
  11. R. Detry, "Learning object-specific grasp affordance densities", IEEE 8th Int. Conf. Development and Learning, 1(7) (2009)
  12. A. Stoytchev, "Behavior-grounded representation of tool affordances", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp.3060~3065 (2005)
  13. K. MacDorman, "Responding to affordances: learning and projecting a sensorimotor mapping", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp.3253~3259 (2000)
  14. Cos-Aguilera, "Motivation-driven learning of object affordances:first experiments using a simulated Khepera robot", Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Cognitive Modeling, pp.57~62 (2003)
  15. G. Fritz, "Visual learning of affordance based cues", Proc. 9th. Int. Conf. the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, LNAI, 4095, pp.52~64 (2006)
  16. P. Fitzpatrick, "Learning about objects through action-initial steps towards artificial cognition", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp.3140~3145 (2003)
  17. V.N. Papudesi, "Learning behaviorally grounded state representations for reinforcement learning robots", Proc. Int. Conf. Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems (2006)
  18. L. Stark, "Function-based recognition for multiple object categories", Image Understanding, 59(10), pp.1~21 (1994)
  19. E. Rivlin, "Recognition by functional parts", Computer Visionand Image Understanding, 62(2), pp.164~176 (1995)
  20. L. Bogoni, "Interactive recognition and representation of functionality", Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 62(2), pp.194~214 (1995)
  21. M. Wunstel, "Automatic Object Recognition within an Office Environment", Proc. 1st IEEE Canadian Conf. Computer and Robot Vision, pp.104~109 (2004)
  22. M.A. Lewis, "Perception Driven Robot Locomotion", Journal Robot Society of Japan, 20(3), pp.51~56 (2002)
  23. T.L. Saaty, "The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation (decision making series)" (1980), McGraw-Hill
  24. A. Neudorfer, "Design of Safety Machinery in Accordance with International Standards" (2002), Nippon HyoronSha Co. Publisher
  25. National Institute of Bioscience and Human-Technology, "Reference Manual of Anthropometry in Ergonomic Designing", ~ (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)