본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

항공기 보정연료 탑재량 조정 필요성에 관한 연구

A Study on Airplane Contingency Fuel Requirements

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Nowadays airplane fuel requirements are largely divided into FAR and JAR. Among these fuel requirements contingency fuel, that is one of legal reserve fuel, is loaded for compensating deviation, that might be occurred during flight between flight plan and actual flight. Our fuel requirements are sticking to FAR and FAR requires the amount of 10% of flight time for contingency fuel, while JAR requires that of 5% of trip fuel. Nevertheless FAR requires the amount of 5 % of flight time for contingency fuel when airlines get the approval of the Operations Specifications B343, but we do not apply that kind of clause now. The amount of 10% of flight time is equivalent to more than 8% of trip fuel. This means that our contingency fuel requirements are on the high side. This study has focused on the fuel requirements comparison between FAR and JAR and between FARs(10% and 5%), specifically contingency fuel requirements, and analyzed the effectiveness between those methods. Roughly estimated, domestic major airlines are able to reduce 54.2 billion won per year when our fuel requirements are changed into JAR.

Abstract

Nowadays airplane fuel requirements are largely divided into FAR and JAR. Among these fuel requirements contingency fuel, that is one of legal reserve fuel, is loaded for compensating deviation, that might be occurred during flight between flight plan and actual flight. Our fuel requirements are sticking to FAR and FAR requires the amount of 10% of flight time for contingency fuel, while JAR requires that of 5% of trip fuel. Nevertheless FAR requires the amount of 5 % of flight time for contingency fuel when airlines get the approval of the Operations Specifications B343, but we do not apply that kind of clause now. The amount of 10% of flight time is equivalent to more than 8% of trip fuel. This means that our contingency fuel requirements are on the high side. This study has focused on the fuel requirements comparison between FAR and JAR and between FARs(10% and 5%), specifically contingency fuel requirements, and analyzed the effectiveness between those methods. Roughly estimated, domestic major airlines are able to reduce 54.2 billion won per year when our fuel requirements are changed into JAR.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. "국토해양부, 고시 운항기술기준(제8장 항공기운항 8.1.9.13), 국토해양부, 2008", ~, pp.규격, 기준 (2008)
  2. "국토해양부, 국내항공법(법 제43조 9항, 시행규칙 제136조), 노해출판사, 2008", ~, pp.지침서 (2008)
  3. 대한항공, "기종별 비행시간 실적(1월-10월)" (2008), 대한항공
  4. 대한항공, "비행운영규정(FOM) 5.6.3" (2009), 대한항공
  5. 한국공항공사, "항공통계(국제선운항)" (2008), 한국공항공사
  6. "Boeing, B747-400 Flight Planning & Performance Manual Sec. 2 Flight Planning, Boeing, 2007", ~, pp.지침서 (2007)
  7. "FAA, FAR Part 121.645 Fuel Supply, FAA, 2009", ~ (2009)
  8. Airbus, "Aircraft Performance Sec. I Fuel Planning & Management, Airbus Industry", pp.171~188 (2003)
  9. "ICAO, ICAO Annex 6 Part 1.4.4.6.3, ICAO, 2003", ~ (2003)
  10. "JAR-OPS 1.255 Subpart D & AMC-OPS 1.255", ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)