Analysis of Passenger and Freight Transportation Network Characteristics of Major Airports in Southeast Asia
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The major airports in Southeast Asia (SEA) play important roles as hubs for connecting Asian countries and cities and have been rapidly expanding the aviation network over the last 10 years. To date, however, most studies have focused on airports in the United States, Europe, and Northeast Asia, limiting the network status of SEA airports. Therefore, this study analyzes the connectivity of passenger and freight networks for 10 major airports in SEA, by investigating link connection of these airports to each other and to other airports from all over the world. Social Network Analysis (SNA) is applied to investigate degree centrality, betweenness centrality and closeness centrality sequentially. As results, both betweenness centrality as well as degree centrality of Singapore Airport, Kuala Lumpur Airport and Bangkok Airport were high enough as hub-airports in SEA. Interestingly, Singapore Airport played a pivotal role in passenger and freight transport from 2006 to 2011, however fell down to the third place in 2016 due to declining airport throughputs. Kuala Lumpur Airport and Bangkok Airport, on the other hand, saw a sharp growth rate, surpassing Singapore’s airports after 2012. Currently, global hubs and major airports, including Incheon International Airport, are investing heavily in capacity through infrastructure expansion and are establishing various policies to increase operational efficiency. The results of this research can be used as a useful reference for understanding the pattern of changes in the aviation network from 2006 to 2016, and for developing proper strategies for responding to coming future changes.
Abstract
The major airports in Southeast Asia (SEA) play important roles as hubs for connecting Asian countries and cities and have been rapidly expanding the aviation network over the last 10 years. To date, however, most studies have focused on airports in the United States, Europe, and Northeast Asia, limiting the network status of SEA airports. Therefore, this study analyzes the connectivity of passenger and freight networks for 10 major airports in SEA, by investigating link connection of these airports to each other and to other airports from all over the world. Social Network Analysis (SNA) is applied to investigate degree centrality, betweenness centrality and closeness centrality sequentially. As results, both betweenness centrality as well as degree centrality of Singapore Airport, Kuala Lumpur Airport and Bangkok Airport were high enough as hub-airports in SEA. Interestingly, Singapore Airport played a pivotal role in passenger and freight transport from 2006 to 2011, however fell down to the third place in 2016 due to declining airport throughputs. Kuala Lumpur Airport and Bangkok Airport, on the other hand, saw a sharp growth rate, surpassing Singapore’s airports after 2012. Currently, global hubs and major airports, including Incheon International Airport, are investing heavily in capacity through infrastructure expansion and are establishing various policies to increase operational efficiency. The results of this research can be used as a useful reference for understanding the pattern of changes in the aviation network from 2006 to 2016, and for developing proper strategies for responding to coming future changes.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김벽진, "국제 항공 여객운송의 네트워크 구조 분석", 한국항공경영학회지, 15(5), pp.133~162 (2017), 한국항공경영학회
- 오성열, "아시아 주요국가의 공항네트워크 구조 및 집중도 분석", 한국항공경영학회지, 8(2), pp.43~58 (2010), 한국항공경영학회
- 서명선, "항공운송산업 글로벌 네트워크의 성과에 관한 연구", 한국항공경영학회지, 11(6), pp.37~64 (2013), 한국항공경영학회
- Adriaensens, S., "Comparing acceptance and rejection in the classroom interaction of students who stutter and their peers: A social network analysis", Journal of Fluency Disorders, 52, pp.13~24 (2017)
- Akuma, S., "Comparative analysis of relevance feedback methods based on two user studies", Comput. Hum. Behav, 60, pp.138~146 (2016)
- Bagler, G., "Analysis of the airport network of India as a complex weighted network", Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387(12), pp.2972~2980 (2008)
- Bonacich, P., "Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification", Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), pp.113~112 (1972)
- Bowen, J. T., "A spatial analysis of FedEx and UPS:hubs, spokes, and network structure", Journal of Transport Geography, 24, pp.419~431 (2012)
- Costa, L. d. F., "Analyzing and modeling realworld phenomena with complex networks: a survey of applications", Adv. Phys, 60, pp.329~412 (2011)
- Duy, D. P., "Applications of social network analysis in behavioral information security research: Concepts and empirical analysis", computers and security, 68, pp.1~5 (2017)
- Emirbayer, M., "Manifesto for a relational sociology", Am. J. Sociol, 103, pp.281~317 (1997)
- Freeman, L., "Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification", Social Networks, 1, pp.215~239 (1979)
- Goetz, A. R., "The good, the bad, and the ugly: 30 years of us airline deregulation", J. Transp. Geogr, 17, pp.251~263 (2009)
- Guimerá, R, "The worldwide air transportation network: anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities’ global roles" (2005)
- Hatala. J. P., "Social network analysis in human resource development: a new methodology", Human Resource Development Review, 5(1), pp.45~71 (2006)
- Hitchcock, M, "Tourism in Southeast Asia: challenges and new directions" (2009), Nias Press
- Hossain, M. M., "A complex network approach towards modeling and analysis of the Australian Airport Network", Journal of Air Transport Management, 60, pp.1~9 (2017)
- Junker, B. H., "Exploration of biological network centralities with CentiBiN", BMC Bioinformatics, pp.1~7 (2006)
- Lin, J., "The evolving network structure of US airline system during 1990-2010", Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 410, pp.302~312 (2010)
- Lordan, O., "Robustness of airline route networks", Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 445, pp.18~26 (2016)
- Lordan, O., "Robustness of the air transport network", Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 68, pp.155~163 (2014)
- Mitchell, J. C, "The concept and use of social networks", Social Networks in Urban, ~ (1969)
- Newman, M. E., "The structure of scientific collaboration networks", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 98(2), pp.404~409 (2001)
- Newman, M. E., "The structure and function of complex networks", SIAM Review, 45(2), pp.167~256 (2003)
- Nieminen, J., "On centrality in a graph", Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, pp.322~336 (1974)
- Oriol, L., "Study of the topology and robustness of airline route networks from the complex network approach: a survey and research agenda", Journal of Transport Geography, 37, pp.112~120 (2014)
- Raghuraman, K., "Troubled passage to India, Tourism Manage", 19, pp.533~543 (1998)
- 송민근, "Analysis of the Air Transport Network Characteristics of Major Airports", The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 33(3), pp.117~125 (2017), 한국해운물류학회
- Wang, J., "Exploring the network structure and nodal centrality of ChinaĜs air transport network: A complex network approach", Journal of Transport Geography, 19, pp.712~721 (2011)
- Wang, J., "Evolution of air transport network of China 1930-2012", Journal of Transport Geography, 40, pp.145~158 (2012)
- Wasseman, S, "Social Network Analysis: Method and Applications" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Wellman, B., "Structural analysis: from method and metaphor to theory and substance", pp.19~61 (1988), Cambridge University Press
- Zanin, M., "Network analysis of Chinese air transport delay propagation", Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 30(2), pp.491~499 (2017)
- Zanin, M, "Modelling the air transport with complex networks: a short review" (2013)