최세진의 輯覽類 사전에 대하여 -『老朴集覽』과 『吏文輯覽』을 중심으로-
Choe Sejin’s Variety of Jimnam(輯覽) Reference Dictionaries
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper focuses on Choe Sejin(崔世珍)’s “Nobakjimnam” and “Imunjimnam”, both varieties of ‘Jimnam(輯覽)’ dictionaries, and looks at the system and background of their compilation. Through considering their special features, this paper also analyzes Choe Sejin’s contributions to Chinese and Imun education. If the “Nobakjimnam” was a reference for colloquial Chinese from the original texts of the Chinese conversation teaching materials “Nogeoldae(老乞大)” and “Baktongsa(朴通事)”, then the “Imunjimnam” was a reference for official Chinese from the original text of “Imun”, a diplomatic document. During the Joseon era, the national policy towards China was one of subservience, and as a result of the need for exchange with China the acquisition of Chinese and Imun was incredibly important from a national perspective. A reference book responding to the chronological changes of the Chinese language was urgently needed, and Choe Sejin, the best scholar of Chinese from the Tang era, responded to this demand by compiling the variety of ‘Jimnam’ dictionaries. Choe Sejin, as a scholar with incredible ability in terms of Chinese and Imun, was irreplaceable, and he was unrivaled to the extent that there were always worries in the royal court. His deep knowledge of Chinese and Imun can also be sufficiently confirmed through the large number of books referred to in the “variety of Jimnam(輯覽)” dictionaries. The exchange of linguistic communication and diplomatic documents with China was an extremely important task that could not possibly be dealt with carelessly. Thus, no matter how much praise these two dictionaries receive for the importance of their compilation and their value as reference books, that praise could never be called excessive.
Abstract
This paper focuses on Choe Sejin(崔世珍)’s “Nobakjimnam” and “Imunjimnam”, both varieties of ‘Jimnam(輯覽)’ dictionaries, and looks at the system and background of their compilation. Through considering their special features, this paper also analyzes Choe Sejin’s contributions to Chinese and Imun education. If the “Nobakjimnam” was a reference for colloquial Chinese from the original texts of the Chinese conversation teaching materials “Nogeoldae(老乞大)” and “Baktongsa(朴通事)”, then the “Imunjimnam” was a reference for official Chinese from the original text of “Imun”, a diplomatic document. During the Joseon era, the national policy towards China was one of subservience, and as a result of the need for exchange with China the acquisition of Chinese and Imun was incredibly important from a national perspective. A reference book responding to the chronological changes of the Chinese language was urgently needed, and Choe Sejin, the best scholar of Chinese from the Tang era, responded to this demand by compiling the variety of ‘Jimnam’ dictionaries. Choe Sejin, as a scholar with incredible ability in terms of Chinese and Imun, was irreplaceable, and he was unrivaled to the extent that there were always worries in the royal court. His deep knowledge of Chinese and Imun can also be sufficiently confirmed through the large number of books referred to in the “variety of Jimnam(輯覽)” dictionaries. The exchange of linguistic communication and diplomatic documents with China was an extremely important task that could not possibly be dealt with carelessly. Thus, no matter how much praise these two dictionaries receive for the importance of their compilation and their value as reference books, that praise could never be called excessive.
참고문헌 (21)
- 구범진, "吏文 譯註(上ㆍ中ㆍ下)" (2012), 세창출판사
- 조선시대 외교문서-명ㆍ청과 주고받은 문서의 구조분석, "구범진", 한국고전번역원, ~ (2013)
- 김경록, "조선초기 吏文의 편찬과 對明 외교문서의 성격", 이화사학연구, (34), pp.221~255 (2007), 이화사학연구소
- 金裕範, "老朴集覽의 成立에 대하여", 국어사연구, 1, pp.69~96 (2000), 국어사학회
- 朴在淵, "吏文ㆍ吏文輯覽" (2001), 鮮文大學校 中韓飜譯文獻硏究所
- 朴泰權, "李崇寧博士頌壽紀念論叢" (1968), 乙酉文化社
- 박태권, "吏文과 吏文輯覽", 睡蓮語文論集, 1, pp.77~105 (1973), 수련어문학회
- 안병희, "增定于公奏議ㆍ駁稿ㆍ奏議擇稿輯覽 解題", 書誌學報, 8, pp.131~144 (1992), 韓國書誌學會
- 안병희, "增定吏文ㆍ增定吏文續集ㆍ比部招議輯覽 解題", 書誌學報, 17, pp.147~157 (1996), 韓國書誌學會
- 梁伍鎭, "老朴集覽을 통해 본 元代語 성분", 中國言語硏究, 12, pp.153~180 (2000), 韓國中國言語學會
- 양오진, "吏文과 吏文諸書輯覽의 言語", 중국언어연구, 14, pp.199~227 (2002), 한국중국언어학회
- 양오진, "『老朴集覽』과 標題語에 대하여", 중국언어연구, (37), pp.219~241 (2011), 한국중국언어학회
- 양오진, "『吏文輯覽』과 吏文의 언어", 중국학보, (70), pp.3~21 (2014), 한국중국학회
- 李丙疇, "編校 老朴集覽考" (1966), 進修堂
- 李丙疇, "月印釋譜 第十七과 老朴集覽 補缺 紀實", 東岳語文論集, 8, pp.263~290 (1972), 東岳語文學會
- 李相度, "崔世珍의 漢語敎學에 대한 연구", 박사, 중어학, pp.1995
- 前間恭作, "訓讀 吏文, 末松保和編纂" (1942), 서울 朝鮮印刷株式會社
- 정광, "한이문에 대하여", 한국어학, 29, pp.107~136 (2005), 한국어학회
- 鄭光, "老朴集覽과 老乞大・朴通事의 舊本", 震檀學報, 89, pp.155~188 (2000), 震檀學會
- 鄭光, "譯學書硏究" (2002), 제이앤씨
- 鄭光, "老朴集覽 譯註" (2011), 太學社
