지상과 위성으로부터 측정된 서울시 대기 중 오존 전량의 상호 비교
Inter-comparison of Total Ozone from the Ground-based and Satellite Measurements at Seoul
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Despite the extensive investigations to understand the difference between groundbased and space-borne measurements, there still exist differences in total ozone (TO) measured at those two different platforms. Comparisons were carried out for the first time between TO data obtaiend from the ground based Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers, and the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on board EOS-Aura satellite in a megacity site in Northeast Asia. The TO values retrieved by the OMI-DOAS (Differential optical absorption spectroscopy) algorithm tend to be lower than those measured by the ground based sensors in spring and summer as well as the low solar zenith angle condition. We found that such underestimation of the OMI-DOAS TO is caused by tropospheric ozone underestimated by the OMI-DOAS algorithm when tropospheric ozone are significantly enhanced.
Abstract
Despite the extensive investigations to understand the difference between groundbased and space-borne measurements, there still exist differences in total ozone (TO) measured at those two different platforms. Comparisons were carried out for the first time between TO data obtaiend from the ground based Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers, and the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on board EOS-Aura satellite in a megacity site in Northeast Asia. The TO values retrieved by the OMI-DOAS (Differential optical absorption spectroscopy) algorithm tend to be lower than those measured by the ground based sensors in spring and summer as well as the low solar zenith angle condition. We found that such underestimation of the OMI-DOAS TO is caused by tropospheric ozone underestimated by the OMI-DOAS algorithm when tropospheric ozone are significantly enhanced.
참고문헌 (13)
- Anton, M, "Validation of OMI-TOMS and OMI-DOAS total ozone column using five Brewer spectroradiometers at the Iberian peninsula", J. Geophys. Res-Atmos, 114, pp.D14307~ (2009)
- Balis, D, "Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument total ozone column measurements using Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometer ground-based observations", J. Geophys. Res-Atmos, 112(D24) (2007)
- Buchard, V, "Comparison of OMI ozone and UV irradiance data with ground-based measurements at two French sites", Atmos. Chem. Phys, 8(16), pp.4517~4528 (2008)
- Chung, S. R., "Effect of lamp test and intercomparison of Dobson ozone spectrophotometer on the accuracy of observed total ozone", ~ (1996)
- De Backer, H, "Intercomparison of Total Ozone Data Measured With Dobson and Brewer Ozone Spectrophotometers at Uccle (Belgium) From January 1984 to March, Including Zenith Sky Observation", J. Geophys. Res-Atmos, 96(D11), pp.20711~20719 (1991)
- Fishman, J., "Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone Determined From Satellite Data", J. Geophys. Res-Atmos, 95(D4), pp.3599~3617 (1990)
- Fortuin, J, "An ozone climatology based on ozonesonde and satellite measurements", J. Geophys. Res, V95(D24), pp.31709~31734 (1998)
- Operation Handbook - Ozone Observation with a Dobosn Spectrophotometer, "Komhyr, W. D", WMO, 125~, pp.WMO Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report, 6 (1980)
- Komhyr, W. E, "Dobson spectrophotometer total ozone measurement errors caused by interfering absorbing species such as SO2, NO2 and photochemically produced O3 in polluted air", Geophys. Res. Lett, 7, pp.157~160 (1980)
- Kourtidis, K., "Regional levels of ozone in the troposphere over eastern Mediterranean", J. Geophys. Res-Atmos, 107(D18), pp.8140~ (2002)
- Lalongo, I, "Comparison of total ozone and erythemal UV data from OMI with ground-based measurements at Rome station", Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss, 8, pp.2381~2401 (2008)
- McPeters, R, "Validation of the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument total column ozone product", J. Geophys. Res-Atmos, 113, pp.D15S14~ (2008)
- Veefkind, J. P, "OMI algorithm theoretical basis document", ATBD-OMI-02, 33~51 (2002)