본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

WRF 모형의 수도권 지역 상세 국지 기상장 모의 성능 평가

Performance Evaluation of the High-Resolution WRF Meteorological Simulation over the Seoul Metropolitan Area

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류대기과학

초록

Faithful evaluation of the meteorological input is a prerequisite for a better understanding of air quality model performance. Despite the importance, the preliminary meteorological assessment has rarely been concerned. In this study, we aim to evaluate the performance of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model conducting a year-long high-resolution meteorological simulation in 2016 over the Seoul metropolitan area. The WRF model was configured based on a series of sensitivity simulations of initial/boundary meteorological conditions, land use mapping data, reanalysis grid nudging method, domain nesting method, and urban canopy model. The simulated results of winds, air temperature, and specific humidity in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) were evaluated following statistical evaluation guidance using the surface and upper meteorological measurements. The statistical evaluation results are presented. The model performance was interpreted acceptable for air quality modeling within the statistical criteria of complex conditions, showing consistent overestimation in wind speeds. Further statistical analysis showed that the meteorological model biases were highly systematic with systematic bias fractions (fSB) of 20~50%. This study suggests that both the momentum exchange process of the surface layer and the ABL entrainment process should be investigated for further improvement of the model performance.

Abstract

Faithful evaluation of the meteorological input is a prerequisite for a better understanding of air quality model performance. Despite the importance, the preliminary meteorological assessment has rarely been concerned. In this study, we aim to evaluate the performance of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model conducting a year-long high-resolution meteorological simulation in 2016 over the Seoul metropolitan area. The WRF model was configured based on a series of sensitivity simulations of initial/boundary meteorological conditions, land use mapping data, reanalysis grid nudging method, domain nesting method, and urban canopy model. The simulated results of winds, air temperature, and specific humidity in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) were evaluated following statistical evaluation guidance using the surface and upper meteorological measurements. The statistical evaluation results are presented. The model performance was interpreted acceptable for air quality modeling within the statistical criteria of complex conditions, showing consistent overestimation in wind speeds. Further statistical analysis showed that the meteorological model biases were highly systematic with systematic bias fractions (fSB) of 20~50%. This study suggests that both the momentum exchange process of the surface layer and the ABL entrainment process should be investigated for further improvement of the model performance.

참고문헌 (64)

  1. Angevine, W. M., "Uncertainty in Lagrangian pollutant transport simulations due to meteorological uncertainty from a mesoscale WRF ensemble", Geosci. Model Dev, 7, pp.2817~2829 (2014)[DOI]
  2. Baker, K. R., "Evaluation of surface and upper air fine scale WRF meteorological modeling of the May and June 2010 CalNex period in California", Atmos. Environ, 80, pp.299~309 (2013)[DOI]
  3. Beljaars, A. C. M., "A new parametrization of turbulent orographic form drag", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 130, pp.1327~1347 (2004)[DOI]
  4. Borge, R, "A comprehensive sensitivity analysis of the WRF model for air quality applications over the Iberian peninsula", Atmos. Environ, 42, pp.8560~8574 (2008)[DOI]
  5. Byun, D., "Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the models-3 community multiscale air quality(CMAQ)modeling system", Appl. Mech. Rev, 59, pp.51~77 (2006)[DOI]
  6. Chen, F., "Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. PART I: Model implementation and sensitivity", Mon. Wea. Rev, 129, pp.569~585 (2001)[DOI]
  7. Cheng, F. -Y., "Application of high resolution land use and land cover data for atmospheric modeling in the Houston-Galveston metropolitan area, Part I: Meteorological simulation results", Atmos. Environ, 42, pp.7795~7811 (2008)[DOI]
  8. Cheng, F. -Y., "Investigation of the effects of different land use and land cover patterns on mesoscale meteorological simulations in the Taiwan area", J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol, 52, pp.570~587 (2013)[DOI]
  9. Choi, M. -W., "Comparison of PM2.5 chemical components over East Asia simulated by the WRF-Chem and WRF", CMAQ models: On the models’ prediction inconsistency, 2019, pp.10, 618~
  10. Chou, M. -D., "Parameterizations for cloud overlapping and shortwave single-scattering properties for use in general circulation and cloud ensemble models", J. Climate, 11, pp.202~214 (1998)
  11. Cohen, M. A., "Approach to estimating participant pollutant exposures in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution(MESA Air)", Environ. Sci. Technol, 43, pp.4687~4693 (2009)
  12. Dee, D. P., "The ERA-Interim reanalysis : configuration and performance of the data assimilation system", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 137, pp.553~597 (2011)[DOI]
  13. Enhanced meteorological modeling and performance evaluation for two Texas ozone episodes, "Emery, C.", ENVIRON International Corporation, 235~ (2001)
  14. Miglietta, M. M., "Evaluation of WRF model performance in different European regions with the DELTA-FAIRMODE evaluation tool", Int. J. Environ. Pollut, 50, pp.83~97 (2012)
  15. García-Díez, M., "Seasonal dependence of WRF model biases and sensitivity to PBL schemes over Europe", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 139, pp.501~514 (2013)[DOI]
  16. Grell, G. A., "Fully coupled"online"chemistry within the WRF model", Atmos. Environ, 39, pp.6957~6975 (2005)[DOI]
  17. Hamdi, R., "Coupling the Town Energy Balance(TEB)scheme to an operational limited-area NWP model : Evaluation for a highly urbanized area in Belgium", Wea. Forecasting, 27, pp.323~344 (2012)[DOI]
  18. Hong, S. -Y., "A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation", Mon. Wea. Rev, 132, pp.103~120 (2004)
  19. Hong, S. -Y., "A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes", Mon. Wea. Rev, 134, pp.2318~2341 (2006)
  20. Outdoor air pollution a leading environmental cause of cancer deaths, "IARC", International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, ~, pp.International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, No. 221 (2013)
  21. 전원배, "상세 해수면 온도자료의 반영에 따른 국지 기상장 개선에 관한 수치연구", 한국대기환경학회지, 25(4), pp.304~315 (2009), 한국대기환경학회
  22. 정주희, "수도권 대기질 모델링 정확도 향상을 위한 WRF모델링: 계절별 물리옵션 민감도 연구", 한국환경과학회지, 25(1), pp.67~83 (2016), 한국환경과학회[DOI]
  23. Jimenez-Esteve, B., "Land use and topography influence in a complex terrain area : A high resolution mesoscale modelling study over the eastern Pyrenees using the WRF model", Atmos. Res, 202, pp.49~62 (2018)[DOI]
  24. Jiménez, P. A., "Improving the representation of resolved and unresolved topographic effects on surface wind in the WRF model", J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol, 51, pp.300~316 (2012)[DOI]
  25. 조유진, "CMAQ 모델링을 통한 초기 기상장에 대한 미세먼지 농도 예측 민감도 연구", 한국대기환경학회지, 33(6), pp.554~569 (2017), 한국대기환경학회[DOI]
  26. Kain, J. S., "The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization : an update", J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol, 43, pp.170~181 (2004)
  27. 김도용, "Mesoscale Simulations of Multi-Decadal Variability in the Wind Resource over Korea", Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 49(2), pp.183~192 (2013), 한국기상학회
  28. 김진영, "WRF 모델을 이용한 지표항력모수화 적용과 공간해상도에 따른 한반도 풍속모의 민감도 평가", 한국풍공학회지, 19(3), pp.77~83 (2015), 한국풍공학회
  29. Kryza, M., "Modelling meteorological conditions for the episode(December 2009)of measured high PM10 air concentrations in SW Poland-Application of the WRF model", Int. J. Environ. Pollut, 50, pp.41~52 (2012)[DOI]
  30. Kusaka, H., "A simple single-layer urban canopy model for atmospheric models : comparison with multi-layer and slab models", Bound. -Layer Meteor, 101, pp.329~358 (2001)[DOI]
  31. Laden, F., "Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six U.S. cities", Environ. Health Perspect, 108, pp.941~947 (2000)
  32. Lang, J., "A monitoring and modeling study to investigate regional transport and characteristics of PM2.5 pollution", Aerosol Air Qual. Res, 13, pp.943~956 (2013)[DOI]
  33. Lean, H. W., "Characteristics of high-resolution versions of the Met Office Unified Model for forecasting convection over the United Kingdom", Mon. Wea. Rev, 136, pp.3408~3424 (2008)
  34. 이재복, "적운 모수화 방안이 고해상도 집중호우 예측에 미치는 영향", 대기, 21(4), pp.391~404 (2011), 한국기상학회
  35. 이재규, "둥지격자기법에 따른 영동지방의 겨울철 강수량에 대한 WRF 모델의 민감도: 사례 연구", 한국방재학회논문집, 13(1), pp.105~119 (2013), 한국방재학회
  36. Lee, S. -H., "A vegetated urban canopy model for meteorological and environmental modelling", Bound. -Layer Meteor, 126, pp.73~102 (2008)
  37. Lee, S. -H., "Evaluation of urban surface parameterizations in the WRF model using measurements during the Texas Air Quality Study 2006 field campaign", Atmos. Chem. Phys, 11, pp.2127~2143 (2011)[DOI]
  38. Lee, S. -H., "Impacts of in-canyon vegetation and canyon aspect ratio on the thermal environment of street canyons : numerical investigation using a coupled WRF-VUCM model", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 142, pp.2562~2578 (2016)[DOI]
  39. Lim, K. -S. S., "Impacts of subgrid-scale orography parameterization on simulated atmospheric fields over Korea using a high-resolution atmospheric forecast model", Meteorol. Atmos. Phys, 131, pp.975~985 (2019)[DOI]
  40. Liu, Y., "Verification of a mesoscale data-assimilation and forecasting system for the Oklahoma City area during the joint urban 2003 field project", J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol, 45, pp.912~929 (2006)
  41. Lott, F., "A new subgrid-scale orographic drag parametrization : Its formulation and testing", Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc, 123, pp.101~127 (1997)
  42. McNally, D, "12km MM5 performance goals", 10th Annual AdHoc Meteorological Modelers Meeting, pp.46~ (2009), Environmental Protection Agency
  43. Martilli, A., "An urban surface exchange parameterisation for mesoscale models", Bound. -Layer Meteor, 104, pp.261~304 (2002)
  44. Mass, C., "WRF model physics: Problems, solutions and a new paradigm for progress", Preprints, 2010 WRF Users’ Workshop (2010), NCAR
  45. Masson, V., "A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models", Bound. -Layer Meteor, 94, pp.357~397 (2000)
  46. Mlawer, E. J., "Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres : RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave", J. Geophys. Res. Atmos, 102, pp.16663~16682 (1997)
  47. 문정혁, "초기 입력 자료에 따른 WRF 기상장 모의 결과 차이 – ERA-Interim과 FNL자료의 비교", 한국환경과학회지, 26(12), pp.1307~1319 (2017), 한국환경과학회[DOI]
  48. What’s the difference between FNL and GFS?, "NCAR", National Center for Atmospheric Research, ~ (2014)
  49. Example of air quality modeling report based on air quality modeling guidelines for establishing and evaluating national air policies, "NIER", National Institute of Environmental Research, 52~, pp.NIER-GP, 2013-037 (2013)
  50. A study of accuracy improvement for national air quality forecasting (Ⅰ), "NIER", National Institute of Environmental Research, 21~, pp.NIER-RP, 2014-305 (2014)
  51. Ostro, B., "Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in nine California counties : Results from CALFINE", Environ. Health Perspect, 114, pp.29~33 (2006)
  52. Palmer, T. N., "Predicting uncertainty in numerical weather forecasts", Int. Geophys, 83, pp.3~13 (2000)
  53. 박성화, "수도권 지역에서의 고해상도 지형과 지면피복자료에 따른 수치모의 민감도 실험", 대기, 25(2), pp.309~322 (2015), 한국기상학회
  54. Prabha, T. V., "Role of land surface parameterizations on modeling cold-pooling events and low-level jets", Atmos. Res, 99, pp.147~161 (2011)[DOI]
  55. Salamanca, F., "A new building energy model coupled with an urban canopy parameterization for urban climate simulations - Part II. validation with one dimension off-line simulations", Theor. Appl. Climatol, 99, pp.345~356 (2010)
  56. Sistla, G., "Effects of uncertainties in meteorological inputs on urban airshed model predictions and ozone control strategies", Atmos. Environ, 30, pp.2011~2025 (1996)
  57. A description of the advanced research WRF version 3, "Skamarock, W. C.", NCAR, 125~, pp.NCAR (2008), TN-475+STR
  58. Son, J. -Y., "Characterization of fine particulate matter and associations between particulate chemical constituents and mortality in Seoul, Korea", Environ. Health Perspect, 120, pp.872~878 (2012)[DOI]
  59. Soriano, C., "Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XV", pp.177~185 (2004), Springer
  60. Srinivas, C. V., "Sensitivity analysis of atmospheric dispersion simulations by FLEXPART to the WRF-simulated meteorological predictions in a coastal environment", Pure Appl. Geophys, 173, pp.675~700 (2016)[DOI]
  61. Thunis, P., "The DELTA tool and the benchmarking report template. Concept and Users' guide, Version 2, Joint Research Center, 31 pp. Willmott, C. J., 1981: On the validation of models", Phys. Geogr, 2, pp.184~194 (1981)
  62. 우주완, "수도권 영역의 시간 후방 모드 WRF-FLEXPART 모의를 위한 입자 수에 따른 무작위 오차의 정량 분석", 대기, 29(5), pp.551~566 (2019), 한국기상학회[DOI]
  63. Zhang, Y., "Comparisons of WRF", Chem simulations in Mexico City with ground-based RAMA measurements during the 2006-MILAGRO, 2009, pp.9, 3777~3798
  64. Zhao, W., "Evaluation and parameter-sensitivity study of a single-layer urban canopy model(SLUCM)with measurements in Nanjing, China", J. Hydrometeor, 15, pp.1078~1090 (2014)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)