ICE-POP 2018기간 동계집중관측자료를 활용한 국지수치모델(LDAPS)의 행성경계층고도 검증
Verification of Planetary Boundary Layer Height for Local Data Assimilation and Prediction System (LDAPS) Using the Winter Season Intensive Observation Data during ICE-POP 2018
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Planetary boundary layer height (PBLH), produced by the Local Data Assimilation and Prediction System (LDAPS), was verified using RawinSonde (RS) data obtained from observation at Daegwallyeong (DGW) and Sokcho (SCW) during the International Collaborative Experiments for Pyeongchang 2018 Olympic and Paralympic winter games (ICE-POP 2018). The PBLH was calculated using RS data by applying the bulk Richardson number and the parcel method. This calculated PBLH was then compared to the values produced by LDAPS. The PBLH simulations for DGW and SCW were generally underestimation. However, the PBLH was an overestimation from surface to 200 m and 450 m at DGW and SCW, respectively; this result of model’s failure to correctly simulate the Surface Boundary Layer (SBL) and the Mixing Layer (ML) as the PBLH. When the accuracy of the PBLH simulation is low, large errors are seen in the mid- and low-level humidity. The highest frequencies of Planetary boundary layer (PBL) types, calculated by the LDAPS at DGW and SCW, were presented as types Ι and II, respectively. Analysis of meteorological factors according to the PBL types indicate that the PBLH of the existing stratocumulus were overestimated when the mid- and low-level humidity errors were large. If the instabilities of the surface and vertical mixing into clouds are considered important factors affecting the estimation of PBLH into model, then mid- and low-level humidity should also be considered important factors influencing PBLH simulation performance.
Abstract
Planetary boundary layer height (PBLH), produced by the Local Data Assimilation and Prediction System (LDAPS), was verified using RawinSonde (RS) data obtained from observation at Daegwallyeong (DGW) and Sokcho (SCW) during the International Collaborative Experiments for Pyeongchang 2018 Olympic and Paralympic winter games (ICE-POP 2018). The PBLH was calculated using RS data by applying the bulk Richardson number and the parcel method. This calculated PBLH was then compared to the values produced by LDAPS. The PBLH simulations for DGW and SCW were generally underestimation. However, the PBLH was an overestimation from surface to 200 m and 450 m at DGW and SCW, respectively; this result of model’s failure to correctly simulate the Surface Boundary Layer (SBL) and the Mixing Layer (ML) as the PBLH. When the accuracy of the PBLH simulation is low, large errors are seen in the mid- and low-level humidity. The highest frequencies of Planetary boundary layer (PBL) types, calculated by the LDAPS at DGW and SCW, were presented as types Ι and II, respectively. Analysis of meteorological factors according to the PBL types indicate that the PBLH of the existing stratocumulus were overestimated when the mid- and low-level humidity errors were large. If the instabilities of the surface and vertical mixing into clouds are considered important factors affecting the estimation of PBLH into model, then mid- and low-level humidity should also be considered important factors influencing PBLH simulation performance.
참고문헌 (16)
- "Unified Model Documentation Paper 024 The parameterization of boundary Layer Processes" (2015)[URL]
- M. Collaud Coen, "Determination and climatology of the planetary boundary layer height above the Swiss plateau by in situ and remote sensing measurements as well as by the COSMO-2 model", Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(23), pp.13205~13221 (2014), Copernicus GmbH[DOI]
- Jaime C. Compton, "Determination of Planetary Boundary Layer Height on Short Spatial and Temporal Scales: A Demonstration of the Covariance Wavelet Transform in Ground-Based Wind Profiler and Lidar Measurements*", Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 30(7), pp.1566~1575 (2013), American Meteorological Society[DOI]
- Xiao-Ming Hu, "Evaluation of Three Planetary Boundary Layer Schemes in the WRF Model", Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 49(9), pp.1831~1844 (2010), American Meteorological Society[DOI]
- Hsin-Yuan Huang, "Evaluation of the WRF PBL Parameterizations for Marine Boundary Layer Clouds: Cumulus and Stratocumulus", Monthly Weather Review, 141(7), pp.2265~2271 (2013), American Meteorological Society[DOI]
- 강미선, "시간 고해상도 라디오존데 관측 자료를 이용한 WRF 모델행성경계층고도 정확도 평가", 대기, 26(4), pp.673~686 (2016), 한국기상학회
- Kim, B. -G., "Continental liquid water cloud variability and its parameterization using atmospheric radiation measurement data", J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 110, pp.D15~08 (2005)
- Kim, Y. -K., "A study on the distribution of air pollutant concentration according to micrometeorological characteristics", J. Environ. Sci, 3, pp.31~38 (1994)
- Shuyan Liu, "Observed Diurnal Cycle Climatology of Planetary Boundary Layer Height", Journal of Climate, 23(21), pp.5790~5809 (2010), American Meteorological Society[DOI]
- 남형구, "Characteristics of Easterly-Induced Snowfall in Yeongdong and Its Relationship to Air-Sea Temperature Difference", Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 50(4), pp.541~552 (2014), 한국기상학회
- 남형구, "이동형 차량탑재 라이다 시스템을 활용한 경계층고도 산출 및 분석", 대한원격탐사학회지, 32(3), pp.307~321 (2016), 대한원격탐사학회[DOI]
- Dian J. Seidel, "Estimating climatological planetary boundary layer heights from radiosonde observations: Comparison of methods and uncertainty analysis", Journal of Geophysical Research, 115(D16) (2010), American Geophysical Union (AGU)[DOI]
- "Comparison of planetary boundary layer heights from Jenoptik ceilometers and the Unified Model. Forecasting Research Technical Report No: 605" (2015)[URL]
- Shin, S.-H., "Effects of spatial and temporal variations in PBL depth on a GCM", J. Climate, 20, pp.4717~4732 (2007)
- Stull, R. B., "An Introduction to boundary layer meteorology", pp.666~ (1988), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Y. Zhang, "On the computation of planetary boundary-layer height using the bulk Richardson number method", Geoscientific Model Development, 7(6), pp.2599~2611 (2014), Copernicus GmbH[DOI]